creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Susan Estrich
25 May 2012
The Next Education President

Mitt Romney is right about one thing: Too many American children do receive what he this week called a … Read More.

23 May 2012
Susan Mary Riley, We Will Miss You

It's her voice that I keep hearing in my head. "Susan," she would say, in that quiet, commanding … Read More.

18 May 2012
Boring

When my kids were young, about the worst thing they could say about something was that it was capital-b BORRRING.… Read More.

The American People

Share Comment

My friend Francie's mother used to be known by all as "the Nation." It was a loving nickname based on her tendency to make pronouncements to one and all about what the nation thought of a particular topic. She would laugh.

I wonder if House Speaker John Boehner has a sense of humor.

Monday night, in justifying his walk-away from budget negotiations in which he had been avidly participating until Saturday, Boehner announced that "the American people" would not accept any tax increases — even from closing loopholes or increasing taxes on the wealthy beginning two years from now, when the economy will hopefully be less fragile.

How, one might ask, did the American people come to that conclusion when only last Friday they were open to a major deal? Did something happen to make the American people change their mind on Saturday? How could I have missed it?

I could understand if he had said: My conservative Republican base in the House won't vote for anything that remotely looks like a tax increase, even if Democrats are willing to eat Social Security and Medicare cuts, even if the ratio of spending cuts to tax hikes (or loophole closings) is 4 to 1. That would be the truth. But "the American people"?

Of course, the Republican speaker is not the only one to invoke "the American people" to cover his own political you-know-what. Politicians on both sides, most of whom speak of themselves as "we," are prone to announcing that whatever they think, or their base thinks, is what "the American people" have somehow decided.

Yes, there are certain things on which the American people probably do agree. In the wake of the September 11 attacks, the American people really were shocked and appalled and angry and determined. All of us.

On Veterans Day, the American people really are united in saluting those who have died for this country and in expressing our appreciation for those who put their lives on the line for our freedom. When a congresswoman is shot at a supermarket event and those who came to greet her are killed in cold blood, the American people really do condemn the violence, regardless of whether we are for or against gun control. I'm sure I could think of a few more examples if I tried, but budget policy would never be one of them.

It's easy to do what "the American people" want. Saying yes to a crowd is easy. Saying no to your base is not. I try not to pay too much attention to the on-again, off-again negotiations in Washington. It's hard to listen and not get aggravated at all the posturing and game playing. This could be an opportunity to actually make real progress on budget issues, but I'm old enough to know that any deal would require political courage and cynical enough to believe that courage is the attribute that is hardest to find in the political capital of the world.

Why be courageous when you can hide? Why focus on what is really best for the American people when you can spend your time figuring out how to get to the 50 percent plus one it takes to hold on to your job or get the next one? So the American people are facing crushing unemployment. So our kids are going to be left with these bills. So the programs senior citizens rely on are going to run out of money. The next election is only 16 months away. Get it?

We are a diverse country. When it comes to dealing with the deficit, we don't agree. We don't have a consensus. There may be a moderate majority who would like to see a sensible solution, but there are also plenty of ideologues on both sides who will try to block any assault on their sacred cows. Compromise is the mother's milk of politics precisely because there is no solution that will satisfy everyone. Pardon me, but the American people know that.

Who will tell Boehner?

To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM


Comments

18 Comments | Post Comment
Who will tell Obama? When he was elected we were all told how great and unifying he would be. Most people really didn;t want QE2 Obamacare, 9% unemployment, and would would like the "liberty" of moving across country, which Boejng can't. When the people spoke loudly for fiscal conservatism at the mid-term it didn't seem to matter what they wanted, they were branded "teabaggers" and sometimes "insurgents". "Insurgents" for cryng out loud. Complain about debt and you are an "insurgent". Susie, don't tell us what "we" want because you have no clue. You only recognize what you and your party want. Congress has the purse strings. It's called "checks and balances". That's what we want.



Comment: #1
Posted by: Tom
Tue Jul 12, 2011 5:31 PM
Ms. Estrich, you decry Mr. Boehner's speaking for "the American people", while you claim to know "what is best for the American people". This is unlike you. I enjoy your writing, because you seem to be a serious, responsible Democrat. Today, however, you sound like our President.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Motley Wisdom
Wed Jul 13, 2011 6:05 AM
Talk about an idologue! You fit the bill today Susan. We tell the Governmeent what to do, they don't tell us. When are you going to understand that we don't need a "moral" big brother governing us... we are self governing. Your arguement is in-credible, as is your ideology. Change is here and you're not going to like it.
Comment: #3
Posted by: PSAVKO
Wed Jul 13, 2011 6:22 AM
In the mid terms of 2010 ( try to remember them Susan and all Libs) in a pendulum swing of historic proportion Republicans in Congress, Republicans at Governor level in the States and in State Houses reaped the reward of a whirlwind of dissatisfaction of the voting, working, contributing, paying their way, non parasitic, sugar daddy to the moochers true American people as they registered their disgust with the Democrat caused and Obama sustained and deliberately worsened recession wracked economy and with the unconscionable spending of this Administration. Today over 53% of those polled favor absolute repeal of Obamacare (an action which of itself would negate any debt ceiling raise) and by a margin of 47% to 19% of those who know anything about the matter favor no debt ceiling increase to an increase. Obama in his best “Amos n Andy” BS about band aids and eating peas [Jackass !] did however give the game away. He queried how he could be allowed to keep hundreds of thousands of dollars [for a book he did not write. Obama to Bill Ayers thanks Bill]. Allowed to Keep! Obama's comment is instructive as to his mindset. He is of the belief that money earned belongs not to the earner but to the State to be dolled back to the earner or to be redistributed at the will of the State. That confiscatory redistributionist ideology is anti Constitution and anti American as is the Democratic party ideology. John Boehner may not speak for all people residing in America, but he has a clear mandate from the majority of the voting people and does indeed speak for all true Americans who believe in liberty. Liberty is for a man to do as he pleases with himself and the product of his labor. Tyranny is for some men to do as they please with other men and the product of other men's labor. It is not difficult to determine in the present discussion who believes in liberty and who practices tyranny.
Comment: #4
Posted by: joseph wright
Wed Jul 13, 2011 6:25 AM
Susan,
Please write an article on the merits of Marxism. It's long overdue.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Early
Wed Jul 13, 2011 6:48 AM
Great piece! Note, I am a strong conservative with an originalist bent, so it is not often that I do agree with your positions. However, in this instance I think you squarely hit the nail on the head. We are lacking a significant amount of real courage in Washington these days, on both sides of the isle, as it relates to what will truly solve our fiscal problems and what will be acceptable to the American people. I suspect you tend to write articles toward the leanings or your own base, it is only natural. So, I would make the point that the only thing I take exception to is that putting all of the blame on poor Mr. Boehner is a bit of a cheap shot, and somewhat one (left) sided. It was just this week that President Obama made a similar statement (which I can't directly quote) in saying that he had the support of the American people to raise taxes as part of the solution to the debt crisis. I, for one, am not in agreement with a policy of raising taxes anymore, and that it is time to make a stand. I just don't trust the intentions of this government to use the money to pay down the debt. History has shown that new taxes always go to new spending, so I say stop the madness. Either way, severe pain is coming because paying off over $14 trillion dollars (of principal, never mind the bloody interest) ain't happening any time soon. I am ready to take the pain now versus 10 years or more down the road so hopefully my children and grandchildren will have a chance of digging out in their lifetimes.
Who will tell President Obama?
Comment: #6
Posted by: B Edwards
Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:03 AM
Can you seriously suggest that the Democrats stand for compromise when they passed Obamacare without a single Republican vote? They crafted this program after months of closed-door meetings which excluded every Republican in country; in effect, taking over one sixth of the economy without bipartisan debate. They forced a vote on the bill, some two thousand, seven hundred pages long, less than forty hours after giving a copy of it to all the members of Congress, and in the face of the disapproval of the majority of public opinion. If the Democrats were to enjoy such power again they would not hesitate to ram their policies down the throats of the "American People" without debate and without compromise. They cry out for principle only when they lack power.
Comment: #7
Posted by: Cowboy Jay
Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:30 AM
Hi All,

Ms. Estrich would have "the American People" and us the readers believe NO LIBERAl politican such as Senator Schumer has said the exact same words when blathering on about Gun Control.

Cheez Ms Estrich, don't you ever get tired being a Hypocrite!
Comment: #8
Posted by: Dennis
Wed Jul 13, 2011 10:59 AM
When Chris Matthews and Bill O'Reilly both turned into total whack jobs, you were my last great hope. Now you're starting to sound like a loon. The President is so divisive that he has polarized the country like no other. Not even Bush or Carter.
Take a few weeks off from writing this blog.. Teach your law students. SC's no Boalt but it's close.
You've lost it.
Comment: #9
Posted by: Dave Kidd
Wed Jul 13, 2011 11:11 AM
How would the speaker of the house speak for the American people? What nerve, He was elected of the people and by the people, was chosen to lead all elected (of the people by the people types) representatives of the people to speak FOR THE PEOPLE. How are you a professor of law when you dont understand or want to admit how representative goverment works?
Comment: #10
Posted by: jesse
Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:30 PM
Come on Susan! You can't be that daft!!!! What do you think the 2010 election was all about, if not the voice of the American people. We the American people spoke up--cut spending, no tax hikes, no raising the debt ceiling. Live within our means and I mean Washington DC. Get off your marxist high-horse and get a clue.
Comment: #11
Posted by: Naomi
Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:49 PM
Keep carrying that water Susan. The American People are well aware of all the games being played here; and I'm talking about the games the liberals are playing. The Democrats did not even pass a budget last year when they had full control of Congress and they have yet to propose one this year! Why is that? All they do is demand that Republicans come up with a solution, which they have, and then they sit there and criticize without any ideas of their own. Your President, being the typical liberal/marxist he is, also has not given any specifics regarding a plan to deal with the debt ceiling. Jan 2013 cannot come soon enough!

Comment: #12
Posted by: E Ortiz
Thu Jul 14, 2011 1:59 PM
Bravo!!!!!! You said it like it is. You are the voice for so many of us who know the score and wish the Congressional leaders did and in particular Erik Kantor and Boehner and Mitch McConell who are placing politics before working for the good of the American people and America.

Dr Mary Rando Eberhardt MD
Pennsylvania
Comment: #13
Posted by: mary Eberhardt
Thu Jul 14, 2011 4:59 PM
The "American People" are already voting in the next election.......they are doing so by way of their contributions. President obama has raised two and one half times as much as ALL THE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES COMBINED.....
The conservatives can stick their heads in the sand all they want and keep up their racist drivel against the president but reality will soon set in.
I did not vote for Obama in the last election. I probably won't vote in the next election as my health has made going out a problem so I wil just sit on the sidelines and watch the game. Money drives elections . It is hjalf of the battle. The other half is the level of ANGER of the voting public. As a former Inspector of Elections, I know that senior citizens are the most solid block of voters out there. The Republicans can't keep poking them in the eye with a stick. Pretty soon they fight back. Rolling back medicare in order to give tax breaks to the rich means that Grandma has to pay the extra money right out of her purse. (How is THAT not a tax increase for Grandma???)
Comment: #14
Posted by: robert lipka
Thu Jul 14, 2011 5:35 PM
Re: robert lipka As always if there are two ends to any one stick Lipka manages to grasp a non existent third. Democrats and Obama, falsely posturing as savior of Medicare are in fact destroying Medicare. Obama, Reid et al have already gutted it by the passing of Obamacare. In the annual report of the Medicare Board of Trustees, Medicare's chief actuary (Richard Foster) noted that payment rates for doctors and hospitals serving seniors will be cut by 30% over the period 2011-2014. By 2019 Medicare payments will be lower than under Medicaid and one third of that paid by private insurance. Obamacare per the report cuts $818 billion from Medicare Part A from 2014 to 2023. Adding in Obamacare cuts for Medicare Part B the cuts over the first ten years is $1.05 trillion. These draconian cuts were the basis of the CBO score repeatedly cited by Obama for Obamare reducing the deficit however the deceitful Obama and Democrats never actually disclosed how the deficit reduction would be achieved. In distinct contrast Paul Ryan's plan is entirely different. Contrary to the lie posited by Lipka there are no cuts to benefits for those now on Medicare or for anyone who turns 65 before 2022. Secondly Ryan's plan leaves seniors in charge of their own medical decisions not IPAB which will ration care. Finally in Ryan's plan any savings will be plowed back into Medicare thus prolonging its life rather than being diverted as Obama would do to paying for new entitlement programs for other Democrat pet vote grabbing economy destroying entitlement programs. Obama and the Democrats are to Grandma (and Grandad) as Colonel sanders is to chickens and they now are figuring that out.
Comment: #15
Posted by: joseph wright
Thu Jul 14, 2011 6:24 PM
Being called a liar by the racial bigot Joseph Wright , I take as a compliment. The point of my above post was that the American people are voting already with their contributions......That he is raising moeny at a faster rate (Two and one half times ) than all the other Republican candidate combined is a FACT.

Most bigots can't deal with the FACT that other Americans like this black man enough to support him with their cash.
Comment: #16
Posted by: robert lipka
Fri Jul 15, 2011 6:02 AM
Ms. Estrich, I find your columns interesting, informative and well written. We disagree on many issues but you present your side of the isle very well. In this article however, you say both sides have problems with knowing what the American people need or want but you only present one person from the opposite side of the isle from you. Both sides have blood on their hands when it comes to government spending and taxing. Neither can claim the moral high ground because there is none. The article would have been better had you pointed (maybe) that the President is acting like a child by threatening to hold Social Security checks from our seniors if he doesn't get what he wants. The main problem here is both sides are guilty but they are posturing for a way to blame each other and claim victory--not going to happen. It would be marvelous if the President and the Speaker of the House could stand together at a podium and tell the American people that WE have come to a solution--together both Democrat and Republican--no losers--one BIG WINNER--the American people. John McLemore
Comment: #17
Posted by: John McLemore
Sat Jul 16, 2011 7:40 AM
Let's tax the hell out of the 50% who pay taxes and give that money plus what we borrow to the other 50% who don't give a damn about this country. Why delay the next revolution?
Comment: #18
Posted by: Early
Mon Jul 18, 2011 7:48 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Susan Estrich
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Tom Rosshirt
Tom RosshirtUpdated 26 May 2012
David Sirota
David SirotaUpdated 25 May 2012

11 Jun 2010 The Value of Experience

14 Jan 2011 Blood Libel

7 Feb 2007 Bush's Monica