creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Susan Estrich
15 May 2013
Benghazi and Lewinsky

On its face, the murder of Americans in Libya, including our ambassador, has absolutely nothing to do with … Read More.

10 May 2013
Mother Love

My daughter was born on Mother's Day, 23 years ago. It was the happiest day of my life — matched only, … Read More.

8 May 2013
The Drunk Guy in the Parking Lot

The report from the Arlington, Va., Police Department is, on its face, hardly newsworthy: "SEXUAL BATTERY,… Read More.

Rejection Season

Comment

Yesterday, Stanford University announced it had accepted a mere 7.2 percent of the tens of thousands of high school seniors across the country who applied for admission to the class of 2014. Other highly selective schools will be making similar announcements in the days ahead.

Meanwhile, in the world of law school admissions, a world I know well, applications are up at many schools by 10 percent or more, which means acceptances will be down by at least that much. This is, in short, the season in which hardworking and dedicated students across the country discover that their best was just not good enough.

I know how they feel.

I still remember, nearly four decades later, fingering those thin envelopes from the colleges and universities I yearned to attend. And the very thick one from Wellesley College, the only women's college I applied to and only because my mother volunteered to type up only that application.

Wellesley accepted me — and offered me an extremely generous financial package, which my middle-class family (with my older sister already in college) very much needed. There was no question, no ifs or buts. It was not what I wanted, but I was going to Wellesley.

Like so many of the students opening thin envelopes this week, I had done everything I could to earn admission to the schools that didn't want me. I was a straight-A student, president of every organization, a scholarly baton twirler, a candy striper, at the very top of my high school class. And I held down a part-time job while doing all the rest.

But there were no Advanced Placement classes at the public high school I attended, no prep courses or tutors to teach me how to ace the SATs. My father didn't go to any of the colleges I applied to; my mother didn't go to college at all. I don't think I even knew what "legacy" meant.

It would be nice if I could tell you that I had just as much fun at Wellesley as I would have had at the places that rejected me, but I'm not sure that's true.

I can tell you that, years later, I came to understand that in many, many ways, going to Wellesley changed my life for the better. It gave me confidence in my abilities and support for my ambitions that stood me in good stead through the challenges that came later, and Wellesley was the place where I met lifelong friends. But I certainly didn't feel that way at the time.

I didn't have a boyfriend, and I spent way too much time trying and getting rejected. The endless dateless Saturday nights no doubt contributed to nagging issues of personal insecurity that dogged me for decades. Would it have been different at a coed school? Who knows? There are things you simply never know.

But this much I do know, from the distance of decades. I know that being rejected by Harvard was a whole lot easier than losing my father a few years later, when I was in law school at Harvard. I would have traded that fat envelope in a minute.

I know that no one gets all Aces, that life is rarely a straight flush, beginning to end, and that what matters most is not the cards you are dealt but how you play them. A charmed childhood is no guarantee of a charmed life, and learning to deal with rejection is one of those bitter pills we all have to swallow sooner or later.

I know that after a certain point, no one asks you where you went to school; they ask what you have done since. It is not enough to accept what is. The challenge of life is to do more than that, to adapt, to turn it into something better and to not waste too much time and energy bemoaning what isn't.

So congratulations to all of you who will be heading to your second or third or fourth choices because the schools you wanted to attend said no or didn't offer the financial aid you need. You may end up learning more from being turned down than you ever would from being accepted. It really is up to you. I proved them wrong. So can you.

To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM



Comments

9 Comments | Post Comment
In Europe, University is free. After World War II, the returning soldiers were guaranteed access to an education. That is what made us great for the years hence. That policy gave the best return on investment of the US government - - ever. It is unfortunate the plutocrats want to limit access to education but it is totally understandable given the desire to perpetuate the lineage.
Comment: #1
Posted by: der_spud
Wed Mar 31, 2010 3:45 AM
You're wrong der_spud, a college education is open to many, many people in the US. Part of the problem is that many of the students applying to the myriads of colleges want a specific college: Harvard, Princeton, Yale, etc., etc,. Ivy league schools that may get several thousand applications for a freshmen class made up of, as Ms. Estrich pointed out...7.2% of the total applicants. Will these same students want to go, and be happy with a state school? A smaller, less prestigious school? Have they even tried to get in?
Unfortunately, the tens of thousands of students who receive "that letter" in the mail were probably raised to believe that they were entitled to a Stanford education; or a Yale education; or any other ivy league school. They find it beneath them to actually go to a state school or a less prestigious, smaller school. So the problem isn't so much access to school, for most it is there if you work hard enough. No, in my opinion the problem lays with the fact that many of our children are raised to believe that they are entitled to whatever they want; in this case it is access to a SPECIFIC school.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Painter
Wed Mar 31, 2010 4:35 AM
At this time, with all the 60's hippy professors in the large unversities, consider it a blessing if many of those rejected end up going to a smaller college or university.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Early
Wed Mar 31, 2010 6:52 AM
You write, "This is, in short, the season in which hardworking and dedicated students across the country discover that their best was just not good enough." There are only so many spots for students at Stanford (or any College or University, for that matter). The daunting task of sifting through thousands of applications has to be enormous. Let's say, for argument purposes, that 100% of the applicants were equally qualified. How does one decide who gets the spots. It would seem to me that logically, 92.8% were good enough, but still did not get admitted. Reality bites. That is the lesson that liberals never seem to learn. Instead it is always "somebody's fault". Then you wrote, "I know that after a certain point, no one asks you where you went to school; they ask what you have done since. It is not enough to accept what is. The challenge of life is to do more than that, to adapt, to turn it into something better and to not waste too much time and energy bemoaning what isn't. So congratulations to all of you who will be heading to your second or third or fourth choices because the schools you wanted to attend said no or didn't offer the financial aid you need. You may end up learning more from being turned down than you ever would from being accepted. It really is up to you." Perhaps you have learned something, after all.
Comment: #4
Posted by: David Henricks
Wed Mar 31, 2010 10:04 AM
Susan,

I am a high school counselor and your article today is point on. Thank you so much for writing it. I will share it with our seniors


sam
Comment: #5
Posted by: sammy schwab
Wed Mar 31, 2010 2:14 PM
Three Points
1. You went to Wellesley, no wonder you're a lib
2. Stanfurd Sucks. GO BEARS
3. If you don't get into a top tier school, U$C will take you
Comment: #6
Posted by: David Kidd
Wed Mar 31, 2010 2:29 PM
I like your non-political articles thebest. I really enjoy when you write about friends and family and your past. Today's article was great.
Comment: #7
Posted by: A Foley
Thu Apr 1, 2010 5:01 AM
>I know that after a certain point, no one asks you where you went to school; they ask what you have done since. It is not >enough to accept what is.


yeah, that's what I thought until I saw the Governor or Alaska reduced to where she went to school and her 1980s beauty pageant for cash vids and Obama pumped up for being an Ivy League Grad - a quarter century after the fact. Unbelievable.

But hey, they did notice that Caroline Kennedy hadn't done anything.
Comment: #8
Posted by: colleen
Thu Apr 1, 2010 2:42 PM
I agree Susan (if I may be so bold to call you that.) I went to Smith and was from Canada - and there was no legacy. Later I also attended Harvard and while these universities (Smith especially b/c it was so small and I like you still have lifelong friends, including yes some of my professors!) helped me become who I am today, I learned so much more from many of the extra curricular activities than the classes though I was also a bit of a grind and liked "almost" all of them as well.

Now I teach at a university and see the "best and the brighest" so to speak but I worry about the recruitment process. What about the late bloomers so to speak, the students who can ill afford to attend university (in Canada where it is signifigantly less expensive than the US) or those who come from families where education is not stressed and they somehow are very bright but just never get there. I have also taught in Israel and Ireland - in Ireland, tuition is free , yes, like most European countries though there is a registration fee and one still has to obain money from a County to help with living arrangements. I lived on a kibbutz (every MOT kid my age HAD to do this at one time I think, lol) and saw the entire kibbutz -Daganya celebrated its 100th anniversary yesterday - and saw kids my age attend university for "free" thx to their kibbutzim members. I respect the Ivy's but there are great schools everywhere and in the end, it is really what one MAKES of one's university years that i the difference!
Thanks for a timely column! Happy Passover!
Comment: #9
Posted by: Siobhan
Sat Apr 3, 2010 9:31 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Susan Estrich
May. `13
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Susan EstrichUpdated 15 May 2013
Roger Simon
Roger SimonUpdated 15 May 2013
Robert Scheer
Robert ScheerUpdated 14 May 2013

3 Jun 2009 It's Not About Ideology

20 Dec 2006 Male Rape

23 Dec 2011 Reality Bites