creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Susan Estrich
8 May 2013
The Drunk Guy in the Parking Lot

The report from the Arlington, Va., Police Department is, on its face, hardly newsworthy: "SEXUAL BATTERY,… Read More.

3 May 2013
Mary Thom, Thank You

Mary Thom, former editor of Ms. magazine and feminist visionary, died last week in a motorcycle accident. I … Read More.

1 May 2013
A Gay Man in the NBA

It is almost unbelievable that this is a first. But it is. Jason Collins is the first male athlete playing in … Read More.

Mother Love

Comment

My daughter was born on Mother's Day, 23 years ago. It was the happiest day of my life — matched only, almost three years later, by the birth of my son.

I had never felt such love before.

Hooray for Hallmark.

Years passed. My own mother died. My daughter went off to college and then graduated. My son went off to college.

I see young mothers struggling with squirmy children, exhausted mothers losing their tempers in the mall, mothers and daughters walking and shopping, women my age caring for their own mothers, and I know how hard some of those moments are. But still, I am hopelessly jealous.

I want to say to those tired women, "Don't you know how lucky you are?" — as if my saying it would somehow light a bulb in their brains, calm their nerves, make them realize that the days may be long but the years are so very short. They fly by, and suddenly you are alone at the mall, on the walk, and instead of a squirming child in your arms, you have time on your hands, instead of too many calls from your mother, there are no calls at all.

So this column is not for all the mothers who will be surrounded by family on Mother's Day; it's not for the sons and daughters who will be toasting their mothers on what is the biggest day of the year for eating out.

This one is for those of us who have lost our mothers, for those of us whose children won't be with us that day, for those who never knew the joy I did or who loved and lost.

This one is for those of us who are trying to make our peace with the hardest part of being a mother (or a child), which is not sleepless nights, expense, exhaustion or aggravation. It's letting go.

It is true. From the time our children are born, we begin the process of letting them go into the world, and they begin the process of leaving us.

That is a mother's most important job: not to hold on, but to let go. All of those stories about the mother bird sitting on her eggs and then the baby birds flying away... How could I have missed that? My mother hated birds. Maybe that's why.

There is a scene in "White Oleander," a wonderful novel about the foster care system, that describes teenage girls, abandoned by their mothers, giving birth, screaming in pain, crying out for their mothers.

To grow up without a mother's love leaves a hole you never stop trying to fill. But no matter how we try, no matter how much we love, in ways big and small, we disappoint our children, we do things wrong, we fail them.

"Just you wait," I want to say to those young women. "If only I could do everything again," I say to myself.

I remember a moment, years ago, driving with my two young children in the back seat. I was one of those girls who always had an easier time with my professional life than my personal life. I knew I was smart, but no one ever told me I was pretty. I knew I could support myself, but I feared I would always be alone. And there I was with two children — my children, my blessed, beautiful children! And I wanted to freeze the moment, to be there always, right there.

But of course, that is not how life works. Children need to grow. They need to have their chance at life, with all of its ups and downs. And as they age, so do we.

So, 23 years later, I will not be toasting my new baby on Mother's Day. I will do what I do most Sundays: go to the market, read the paper, do my work. My children will call me, and I will tell them I am fine, good luck with exams, congratulations on the new cat, I am so proud of you. I will think of my own mother, may she rest in peace. I will try to remember, really, how lucky I am, how grateful I should be. I will do my best, which, ultimately, is all any mother can do.

To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2013 CREATORS.COM



Comments

14 Comments | Post Comment
Happy Mothers Day!
Comment: #1
Posted by: Old Navy
Thu May 9, 2013 4:34 PM
A lot of conservative writers will occasionally write pieces on the fundamentals of conservatism. They explain the power of the individual, free markets, and freedom. They explain why and how they work and work well. But liberal writers can't do that. Their philisophy does not work, so they can't explain it. So they fill up their columns with fluff pieces and current events. No one does this better than Susan. This isen't even so much a liberal column as it is just the random thoughts of a quasi feminist.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Thu May 9, 2013 6:40 PM
Very poignant column from Susan.

One of the most touching things I've ever read from her.

She lays bear a bit of the emotion that is the source of many a Liberal's compassion for their fellow man.

She gives truth to the lie that Feminists look down on being a mother.

She clearly loves it, but like the intelligent feminist she is has left out the idiocy many conservatives regurgitate, that it should be the primary, ultimate role for a woman

Sadly underlining it is the utterly clueless comment from Old Navy who thinks a Mother's Day column should be about the wonders of capitalism.

His refusal to feel or care beyond anything other than financials is why their party is headed for a crash and burn in the 2020s. (I can hear the doubling down now, ah but financial freedom is the strongest foundation for happiness blah blah blah) It makes me wonder if he can count the # of times he saw his Mom smile on 1 hand outside of smiling as part of a thank you for some sort of gift he gave her.
Comment: #3
Posted by: jonathan seer
Fri May 10, 2013 6:48 AM
In his incoherent remarks Jonathan Seer stated: "Sadly underlining it is the utterly clueless comment from Old Navy who thinks a Mother's Day column should be about the wonders of capitalism....His refusal to feel or care beyond anything other than financials is why their party is headed for a crash and burn in the 2020s."

Wow! Not one, but two logical fallacies packed into a few sentences. With your permission, I'm going to use your remarks in my 'Critical Thinking' lecture as an example of the logical fallacies of the 'Ad Hominen' and the "Strawman' attack. Your comments illustrate these fallacies in the most bizarre manner I've ever seen. The students are going to love this example.

Let me repeat my entire comment on Ms. Estrich's remarks, "Happy Mothers Day".

Why am I 'clueless' for having made this remark? An Ad Hominen attack on my intellect based on a three word pleasantry offered by tens of millions of individuals to the mothers of this country each year? As I've urged before, attack a persons arguments, not their character. Perhaps Jonathan will care to expound on why Ms. Estrich shouldn't have a "Happy Mothers Day" in a future comment. Or maybe he will tell us why a conservative shouldn't offer such sentiments in print.

Mr. Seer then goes on to ascribe to me all manner of beliefs concerning 'the wonders of capitalism' based on my three word comment. It is almost magical when someone can draw so much unrelated meaning out of so few words. That wasn't a 'straw man', it was a 'straw behemoth'.

Once again, Happy Mothers Day Ms. Estrich.

Mr. Seer, you have whatever kind of day you wish to have.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Old Navy
Fri May 10, 2013 8:26 AM
Re: Old Navy
"Critical Thinking" lecture? What example will the students love? Is it the example in which the critical thinker, entirely missed the blindingly obvious, to wit, that Seer was in fact responding to Chris McCoy and not to him and that Seer's reference to "Old Navy" in the body of his comment was patently no more than an error?

Given that critical thinking is, amongst other matters, intended to raise vital questions, to formulate the problems clearly, to gather and assess all relevant information, to recognize and assess assumptions their implications and consequences, one would have imagined that any lecturer in critical thinker , when faced with such a patently wholly unconnected and wholly illogical response to his pleasantry, would have checked his premise that the response was in fact intended to be to him.

I can hear it now; "students do as I say, not as I do"

Oops!
Comment: #5
Posted by: joseph wright
Fri May 10, 2013 9:37 AM
Old Navy, Seer's comment was intented for me, not you. Never did I say that every comment has to be about politics and that authors can never ever stray into emotional topics. From time to time, taking a break from politics is a welcome break. But for Susan, these topics are the norm and getting into politics is the break. Conservative have less time for this kind of fluff becuase their arguements are better. That is my point. Nothing else. Liberals may have the good intentions, but their politics often do more harm than good. Good intentions do not always help people. Take a simple example, Obamacare. I'm sure it was well intentioned, but the methods that are used will turn healthcare into the proverbial "trainwreck" that the democrats are now calling it. Good intentions towards your fellow man has now become death panels and rationed healthcare.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Fri May 10, 2013 10:47 AM
Oh yes, Living Alone 101; the first class today's feminazi should take. For no guy will take their crap forever.

To be successful and "alone", is tough.
To have the means to travel to all the romantic places, alone, is tough.
To live "alone" is tough.

Sure one is never actually "alone" and one can settle for something "less", perhaps someone just after your money that cares little about you; but you would still be "alone" in the real sense of the word. "Alone" does not mean there is no one around.

Defining "alone" is difficult but you known when you feel it and when you don't.
Susan states: "I will try to remember, really, how lucky I am, how grateful I should be. I will do my best, which, ultimately, is all any mother can do."

Try? What is the "Try" crap.

So what do you do? Carpe diem!

One day soon tomorrow will not come for YOU. Life is too short to sit around and whine about whatever it is that is not "right". I would not waste one day on such whining.

You get out there and you do things, all kinds of things, new things and old things, "alone" if necessary, and you live every moment until that day, when tomorrow never comes, comes. Become the "Yes Man" or Yes Woman". I suspect when you do, someone of substance will notice and want to share that life with you; even if one is a feminazi.

At the very minimum you will have had one hell of a time.

Comment: #7
Posted by: SusansMirror
Fri May 10, 2013 10:59 AM
To JW and CM:
I was well aware that Mr. Seer's comments were not intended for me. However, he did call me out by name so I thought I would respond as I did to provide him with a reminder to proof read his submittals before sending them off. Just detecting your spelling errors can be difficult enough. Sometimes it isn't so easy to figure out an authors unintended errors and name calling like can result in a lot of unnecessary hard feelings on the part of the wrong people.
Comment: #8
Posted by: Old Navy
Fri May 10, 2013 11:57 AM
Re:Old Navy
In your post replying to Seer you expressly refer, inter alia, to his “incoherent remarks” to “[N]ot one, but two logical fallacies packed into a few sentences” and you directly accuse Seer of “Ad Hominen” (sic) attack and to “Strawman attack (sic) and with utmost hubris seek his permission to use his remarks made in reply to your Mother's Day wish to Estrich in your 'Critical Thinking' (sic) lecture as “example of the logical fallacies of the 'Ad Hominen' (sic) and the "Strawman' attack.”

But that notwithstanding, you now say that you were well aware that Seer's remarks were not intended for you and that you simply intended to remind Seer to proof read his post.

Pardon me, but bullsh*t!

Odd, is it not, that the words “remind” “proof read” “submittal” are all remarkably absent from your direct reply to Seer? Even odder, is it not, that you chose not to correct his patent [to all but you] error in using your name.

Old Navy, you are not credible.

Not only did you miss the blindingly obvious first time around, but if you are now to be believed [and you are not] you wholly failed to mention or to effectively communicate your stated intention.

Critical thinking countenances effective communication with others. Your newly stated intention simply cannot be divined from your post.

I doubt very much that you will be using Seer's post, your reply to him or your reply to CMcC and to me in your lecture.

LOL!
Comment: #9
Posted by: joseph wright
Fri May 10, 2013 2:18 PM
Old Navy, I believe you when you say you responded the way you did to teach Seer a lesson. It was an...odd...lesson but ok. As for my spelling mistakes, I'm not writing a college essay. I make mistakes all the time. Whats more important to me is that my points stay concise and consistant. May all the women in your lives be blesses this weekend. And even Susan, who keeps us entertained if nothing else.
Comment: #10
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Fri May 10, 2013 3:01 PM
Susan stop for a moment and reflect on what Obama stated in his Mother's Day speech. Tell me again about his policy of free birth control, the morning after pill and free condums. Does this speech glorify motherhood or does it destroy motherhood?
Comment: #11
Posted by: Gene44
Sat May 11, 2013 1:32 PM
I really enjoyed your column "for moms who are alone today". We read a lot about empty nest syndrome when our children go off to college, but the last leg of motherhood, when our adult children who are still everything to us, are too busy for us, seems to be a painful secret. Thanks for bring it out into the daylight!
Comment: #12
Posted by: Thora Wolfe
Sun May 12, 2013 8:53 AM
I would argue that by encouraging people who don't want, can't afford, or shouldn't have children to use birth control it would bolster motherhood by only having those who want to be mothers to have children and become mothers.
Comment: #13
Posted by: wyn667
Sun May 12, 2013 1:04 PM
I must be a conservative kook as I like Susan Estrich and have since I first met her during Massachusetts Gov. Michael S. Dukakis' unsuccessful run for president in 2008.
As someone who has lost his mother to death, has no children and whose best female friend spent Mother's Day with her mother several continents away, I could relate to Ms. Estrich's column all to well.
Very often, Susan makes common sense.
Comment: #14
Posted by: Daniel Beegan
Sun May 12, 2013 8:16 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Susan Estrich
May. `13
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 13 May 2013
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 11 May 2013
Jamie Stiehm
Jamie StiehmUpdated 10 May 2013

10 Oct 2012 Enough Mother's Milk

29 Feb 2008 Friendship in the Fourth Estate

15 Jun 2012 The Race to the Bottom