creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Susan Estrich
15 May 2013
Benghazi and Lewinsky

On its face, the murder of Americans in Libya, including our ambassador, has absolutely nothing to do with … Read More.

10 May 2013
Mother Love

My daughter was born on Mother's Day, 23 years ago. It was the happiest day of my life — matched only, … Read More.

8 May 2013
The Drunk Guy in the Parking Lot

The report from the Arlington, Va., Police Department is, on its face, hardly newsworthy: "SEXUAL BATTERY,… Read More.

“Ladies Slug it Out”

Comment

That was the headline on Thursday's Drudge Report. And it is as good a summary as any of what happened Wednesday night when incumbent California Sen. Barbara Boxer met her challenger, former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina, in their first debate.

By all measures, Boxer should be vulnerable. She is a liberal. No denying it. She wouldn't think of it.

She is an incumbent, a strong supporter of an increasingly unpopular president, a vigorous opponent of the Iraq war, a very capital "D" Democrat in a year when Democrats are in trouble, even in California.

Even optimistic tried-and-true Democrats are worried about the California governor's race — notwithstanding former Gov. (and now candidate) Jerry Brown's legendary skills and genius as a political wizard, the big registration advantage, the problematic poll numbers of the current Republican governor and the vulnerabilities of former eBay CEO and current gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman.

When I talk to Washington insiders, they scoff when I say I think Boxer is in better shape than Brown. That shouldn't be, not in an anti-Washington, anti-incumbent election.

But if you think I'm wrong, catch a few minutes of Wednesday night's debate.

Boxer repeatedly attacked Fiorina for cutting jobs at HP and shipping them to China and India. She punched hard at Fiorina's putting "Made in China" and "Made in India" labels on her products and touting that as success.

Not fair, retorted Fiorina; Boxer shouldn't be attacking HP.

"She's running on her record as the former CEO of Hewlett-Packard, so what she did there counts," Boxer said. "And I'm going to keep on telling the truth about it."

Who ever said women couldn't throw punches? Ladies?

Despite the climate, Boxer has certain advantages over Fiorina that Brown does not have over Whitman. The first is money. Fiorina and Whitman are both former CEOs, but only one is a billionaire.

That would be Whitman. She built eBay. Fiorina got ousted from HP. Whitman left with a bundle. Fiorina is wealthy — but not wealthy enough to fund a campaign in California. Right now, Boxer holds a definite edge in fundraising.

Then there are the issues. Fiorina had a tougher primary fight, which means she had to move further to the right before she could try to find her way back to the center. Only one-third of the registered voters in California are Republicans. Among them, the most conservative vote in primaries. The reason "moderate" Republicans such as Dick Riordan (the former Los Angeles mayor who could have won a general election for governor of California but couldn't win the Republican primary) and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (who only won election because it was an "open" recall) have successfully pushed for open primaries is because the primary effect on Republicans is to make them unelectable in November.

Fiorina, after a tough primary, finds herself running as an anti-abortion, overrule Roe v. Wade, drill-baby-drill Republican. Not what anyone would call an ideal position.

But what may count for most in the end is what I call the human factor. I never judge people by how they treat people with power: Everybody treats people with power well, unless they have even more power. No, it's how they treat the people beneath them, e.g., the gals who do their makeup before they go charm the anchors interviewing them on live television. No one sees more of candidates this time of year than makeup artists, and while the male candidates often race in and out, no woman over 50 goes on television without a serious session with foundation and powder.

So I've been doing my own poll. In a year in which an unprecedented number of women are running for office, you get a very good sample size. And after 20 years in television, I know a lot of makeup artists, including the freelancers at the satellite studios where we all end up. The issue is not ideology; it's niceness. Meg Whitman does just fine. So, by the way, do both Barbara Boxer and Sarah Palin.

But Carly Fiorina? Not so much.

To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM



Comments

10 Comments | Post Comment
Wasn't it Boxer and the other Dems that wanted to open up relationships with China. Create more commerce with them? Besides, why can't Boxer just run on her own record, if she is so proud of it. Typical Demo playbook.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Enough Already
Thu Sep 2, 2010 3:04 PM
Maybe Carly needs to shoot back that if it wasn't for Boxer's over-regulating, over-taxing, anti-business votes on nearly everything to hurt companies in the United States, and especially California, then many if not all of those jobs could have been kept in the United States.
As and executive at Intel mentioned last month - it costs $1 billion more to build a chip plant in the United States than elsewhere in the world and it is all in the regulatory area.
Comment: #2
Posted by: lvtaxman
Thu Sep 2, 2010 5:42 PM
As much as I want Boxer defeated, I understand where Susan is on this. Carly rode a wave at Lucent when they had great products and were essentially order takers. While her tenure at HP was rocky, she supported key initiatives critical to the survival of the company, though I doubt there were her own ideas. Moving the manufacture of things to more cost effective place around the world was very important. If you don't do it, your competitors will and they will have you for lunch, too. Boxer doesn't realize that it has been her sort of policies that has dramatically raised the cost of doing business in California and led to the exodus of business to better economic climates.

We know where Boxer stands on issues, and she has to go.
Comment: #3
Posted by: pb1222
Thu Sep 2, 2010 7:47 PM
Look at this from the man on the street view. Doxer a big Democrat who is all for Obama's message of bigger government, beigger deficits, more government control over the peoples choices for lviing with more and more regulations versus a woman who actually ran a global company having to fight to get product to market with an unfair tax rate compared to other countries - tax rate imposed by Democrats by the way - and the fact that HP gives back to it's investors while government only takes away. I think I would side with the company executive over the government regulator. Maybe the voters will treat this like Prop 13. A vote for Boxer is higher taxation while a vote for Florina is to stop the taxation.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Gene44
Fri Sep 3, 2010 12:52 AM
What "ladies?"
Also, the beautiful state of California is doomed. The Godless social liberals have killed it and the conservatives won't be able to save it.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Early
Fri Sep 3, 2010 5:26 AM
So according to the article Boxer is in good shape because she has good makeup, her money to throw into the election, and negative attacks on her oppenent. Too bad Boxer's policies have led us into a depression, otherwise she'd be sitting pretty. I'd rather have a job than a mean spirited billionaire with good makeup as a Senator.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Leroy W
Fri Sep 3, 2010 9:12 AM
Barbara Boxer makes me sick! Anyone who has to tell a general to call me senator, needs to be humiliated in the election. She is a jerk. Please vote her out.
Comment: #7
Posted by: Lynn
Fri Sep 3, 2010 4:06 PM
nice? who gives a flying hoot how nice politicians are. i want honesty and boldness. we need vince lombardi, not mr rogers. and boxer is anything but nice. just ask that 4 star general she dressed down on national tv. he had the audacity to call her m'am, the female version of sir. no, boxers days are numbered. she is an ultra left big spending liberal...what we don't need in congress, and certainly not in the state of California. good riddance!!
Comment: #8
Posted by: pieman
Sat Sep 4, 2010 5:58 AM
Suzie, don't let yourself get as irrelevant as Maureen Dowd and the NYT
Comment: #9
Posted by: Paul
Mon Sep 6, 2010 12:19 PM
I really hope you are wrong. If Boxer wins, then California gets what it deserves. To bad, as a native bor Californian, I remember what a great state it used to be.
Comment: #10
Posted by: Kevin
Tue Sep 7, 2010 3:00 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Susan Estrich
May. `13
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Susan EstrichUpdated 15 May 2013
Roger Simon
Roger SimonUpdated 15 May 2013
Robert Scheer
Robert ScheerUpdated 14 May 2013

4 Jan 2008 Why Iowa?

27 Feb 2013 Prosecutorial Indiscretion

14 Mar 2007 Obstruction Of Justice