creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Roger Simon
Roger Simon
14 Sep 2014
Why Hillary Hates Iowa

INDIANOLA, Iowa — "Hello, Iowa!" says Hillary Clinton, who has not set foot in Iowa for six years and … Read More.

10 Sep 2014
Snap out of It, Mr. President

I wish the president would go golfing again. Really. He skipped it Sunday, a beautiful day, because he wanted … Read More.

3 Sep 2014
Is Romney Really a Loser for Life?

Unlikely as it might seem, Mitt Romney actually put it best. "I have looked at what happens to anybody in … Read More.

Time to Stop the Health Care Tease

Comment

Each desk in the West Wing of the White House should have the same sign on it as the staff helps the president prepare for his health care speech on Wednesday: KISS.

Keep It Specific, Stupid.

This is no time for a lofty speech. We do not need inspiration. The time for inspiration has passed — the time for perspiration is at hand.

Even though the speech will be before Congress, this should not be a State of the Union Address with soaring flights of rhetoric.

We need to know what the president wants. Specifically.

We need to know how he is going to pay for it. Specifically.

We need to know what he will accept and what he will reject. Specifically.

Nobody likes a tease, and it is now time for the White House to stop teasing about health care. If the president truly is committed to a public option, he should say so. Plainly. Flatly. Finally.

The public option is not, by the way, what the left wing of the Democratic Party wants, as some have charged.

The left wing of the Democratic Party wants a single-payer plan like Canada has. The mainstream of the party — the Democratic wing of the Democratic Party — wants a public option. Obama used to be part of that wing. We'll learn Wednesday night if he still is.

The reason for a public option is the one that Obama stated to the American Medical Association on June 15: "You will have your choice of a number of plans that offer a few different packages, but every plan would offer an affordable, basic package ... one of these options needs to be a public option that will give people a broader range of choices and inject competition into the health care market ... (to) force waste out of the system and keep the insurance companies honest."

The public option keeps the insurance companies honest because it provides competition. Without the public option, the health care industry gets a huge bonus — 46 million new customers — but doesn't have to operate any better or less expensively.

Why is there confusion? Because in August, Obama said at a town hall meeting in Grand Junction, Colo.: "The public option, whether we have it or we don't have it, is not the entirety of health care reform.

This is just one sliver of it, one aspect of it."

So is the public option just an expendable sliver or the driving force behind true health care reform? No wonder people are confused. But the confusion can end — must end — Wednesday. Wednesday, Mr. President, is time to say what you mean and mean what you say.

And here is one other piece of unsolicited advice: Don't worry about winning over the crazies and the weasels. The crazies will call you a socialist, fascist, Hitlerite, Stalinist — and born in Kenya, to boot! — no matter what you say. Forget about them.

And forget about people like Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley. A Republican, he had committed to work for bipartisan reform but went to a town hall meeting in Winterset, Iowa, and told the crowd it had "every right to fear" a government plan "to pull the plug on Grandma."

If you look up "weasel" in the dictionary, you'll see a picture of Grassley.

Obama's commitment to bipartisanship does not include a commitment to getting stabbed in the back. If the Republicans don't want to climb aboard on health care reform, they can stand by the side of the tracks. Either way, the train can still leave the station.

But before it can, the president has to state plainly how he wants to pay for it. By taxing health care benefits? By taxing "Cadillac" plans only? By taxing people making more than $1 million per year? By taxing those making more than $250,000 per year? Tell us. We need to know. The president should not try to sugarcoat the cost of universal health care. That cost is going to be massive: Ten years of health care for every American probably will cost us what we have paid for the Iraq war up to now.

Which would you rather have?

And even though it may seem impolite to go to Capitol Hill and talk about executive power, the president should tell members of Congress what he will accept and what he will veto.

That is not arrogance. It is leadership. It is what we need.

What we don't need Wednesday night is a speech up on the mountaintop, lost in the clouds.

We need a speech down in the trenches, filled with gritty specifics and, yes, a line in the sand.

As the old saying goes, if you don't stand for something, you will fall for anything.

It is time for President Obama to tell us what he really stands for.

To find out more about Roger Simon, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009, CREATORS.COM



Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
"Obama's commitment to bipartisanship does not include a commitment to getting stabbed in the back. If the Republicans don't want to climb aboard on health care reform, they can stand by the side of the tracks. Either way, the train can still leave the station."
How are children supposed to grow up and be honest when so-called "adults" like you are blatantly dishonest? You are the way you are probably because other peurile adults in your life indoctrinated you with the art of spin (which is lying). You are a pathetic excuse for a jounalist. Obama and the Dems (and by consent, you as well) set out to rush and force a healthcare bill down the throats of America with no debate, no critical reading, and no partisanship whatsoever. Then, when the American public screamed to be heard in town hall meeting, the same liberal machine (you included) attacked and dismissed them as "astroturf," "misinformed," "non-representative,' and unamerican." You are a fascist despot like Obama if you think this is democratic, honest, fair, or moral. Now you say that Republicans are being partisan and obstuctionist as if they had no reason. This is exactly why you, and the liberal machine in America, are being exposed for what you are: frauds and hypocrits. You and others like you are what is wrong with America. God-willing we will continue to expose and defeat you, and hopefully get you to move to another country that is more suited to your fascist thinking.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Jimpol
Wed Sep 9, 2009 10:13 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Roger Simon
Sep. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Froma Harrop
Froma HarropUpdated 23 Sep 2014
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 22 Sep 2014
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 20 Sep 2014

4 Jul 2010 A Day Worth Celebrating

28 Dec 2011 Mount Newt Erupts!

16 May 2007 "Blank check" for Iraq needed at home