creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Roger Simon
Roger Simon
25 May 2012
Businessmen Make Lousy Presidents

My experience with vulture capitalism is limited. A vulture could not make even a snack out of my capital. I don'… Read More.

23 May 2012
Is Mitt Romney Count Dracula?

In the end, it won't be about who raises the most money. It won't be about who ate a dog or kept one on the … Read More.

18 May 2012
Poll Results Are “Massaged” Before They Are Released

I promise you this is not another one of my columns about how polls suck. Point One: You already know polls suck.… Read More.

The Wolves of Wall Street

Share Comment

The real toxic assets on Wall Street are the people who run Wall Street.

Their boundless recklessness and their grotesque desire to be enriched for that recklessness are what have brought this country to its current sorry state.

Some think the wolves of Wall Street don't get it. Some think they are out of touch with ordinary Americans, who work hard and play by the rules and don't understand such naked greed.

But the wolves do get it. That's the problem. They get it just fine. Because the way the system is set up, they cannot lose. If you are a small-businessperson and you run your business into the ground, you go out of business. If you are a giant Wall Street firm like AIG and you run your business into the ground, you get $170 billion in bailout money and your executives get at least $165 million in bonuses.

What's not to get about that? The rich get richer. The fat cats get fatter. The rules are designed that way.

If you examine the tick-tock of who knew what when regarding the payment of those bonuses to AIG, one simple fact emerges: Everybody who had the power to block the bonuses knew about them in advance and didn't block the bonuses.

AIG Chairman Edward M. Liddy, who makes only $1 per year and turns out to be worth every penny, did not block the bonuses, and the Federal Reserve did not block the bonuses, and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner did not block the bonuses.

By the way, last week on television, I referred to Geithner as "Timmy." That was unkind of me, and I apologize. It's just that every time I see him, he reminds me of a kid who just got his lunch money taken away from him on the playground.

President Barack Obama said recently, "I think Geithner is doing an outstanding job."

Yeah, heckuva job, Timmy. Whoops. There I go again. Name-calling. Anger. Outrage.

All of these things are bad. It is "class warfare" and "populism" and indicative of a "pitchfork mentality." That is what I am now reading. Taxpayers are to blame for being angry about what is being done with our tax dollars.

It is not enough that we get robbed and plundered — we must be humble about it.

We must bend over and say, "Please, plunder us again." Because anger is bad.

Obama said on "60 Minutes" Sunday that he can't "govern out of anger." And he is right. But he can't govern out of apathy, either — the kind of apathy that our financial regulators have practiced for years.

Jay Leno recently asked Obama, "Shouldn't somebody go to jail?"

The answer should be easy. The answer should be "yes."

Instead, Obama responded, "Most of the stuff that got us into trouble was perfectly legal."

I think that's the problem. I think that is what needs to be changed. But we can't even get the AIG bonus money back! Yes, the House passed a 90 percent tax on the bonuses, but Obama doesn't like the House bill. He said on "60 Minutes" that "we're gonna have to take a look at this legislation carefully" because "we don't wanna cut off our nose to spite our face."

Wall Street cannot lose. Even when it gets caught paying itself obscene bonuses, it cannot lose. We are afraid the wolves will sue us. We are afraid the wolves might get upset or depressed. We are afraid we might be accused of bad behavior.

Larry Summers, director of the president's National Economic Council, said the AIG bonuses had to be paid because "we are a country of law."

Liddy said we had to pay the bonuses because it was the only way to retain "the best and the brightest." Geithner said the bonuses could not be blocked because that would make the government "vulnerable to legal challenge."

To paraphrase Teddy Roosevelt: I could carve better men out of bananas.

I realize it is very tough to find good people to go into government service these days. We spend so much time finding people who have paid their taxes that we cannot summon the energy to find people who have actual backbones, too.

The wolves of Wall Street are not afraid of what Congress is planning. The wolves are in the driver's seat. They are raking it in. That is because the wolves have always operated on the honor system.

We've got the honor, and they've got the system.

To find out more about Roger Simon, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009, CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
For the most part you're on-point about taxpayers being incorrectly lectured-to when we complain about the excesses of the Obama Administration, but please remember that the bonuses being paid to the AIG execs are contractually-obligated retention bonuses. You really need to get the facts on this. That's why Geithner said what he did. They were already agreed-upon before AIG received any bailout money. Furthermore, the bonus payments were OK'd in the stimulus package which was just agreed-upon by BOTH houses on Congress and signed by Obama. Now in the midst of this outrage, we're hearing that many of the congressmen and Senators who voted for that boondoggle (all Democrats, at least in the US House) are admitting that they didn't read the entirety of the bill before freaking VOTING FOR IT! Now they're claiming to have been blindsided by this revelation about the bonuses...when they were IN THE FRACKING STIMULUS BILL! Personally I don't want to hear another damn word about "greedy Wall St execs." I want Congress hung out to dry for their faux outrage over a few million dollars in bonuses that don't amount a drop in the bucket when compared to the overall "stimulus" bill. It's nothing but a diversionary "Hey, look over there - Santa Claus!" tactic by our esteemed (hah!) Democrat Congress. And frankly it's even more terrifying that Congress could pass a bill of attainder (specifically outlawed by the Constitution) aimed at a handful of individual US citizens, taxing them at 90% to get that money back. If the Senate approves that nonsense, we're all screwed. The government will be able to punish anyone it likes. Fasten your seat belt.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Matt
Thu Mar 26, 2009 9:46 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Roger Simon
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Tom Rosshirt
Tom RosshirtUpdated 26 May 2012
David Sirota
David SirotaUpdated 25 May 2012

25 Mar 2011 Icing Gadhafi

3 Sep 2008 Sex Takes Center Stage at GOP Confab

19 Dec 2008 Memories of the 2008 Campaign