opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Roger Simon
Roger Simon
10 Feb 2015
Je Suis Brian Williams!

Ask Dr. Politics! You are fair, and we are unbalanced: Dear Dr. Politics: I say NBC News anchor Brian … Read More.

3 Feb 2015
Mitt Had the Heart but Not the Guts

Mitt Romney has done a lasting service to America. By returning once again to the dustbin of history, he … Read More.

24 Jan 2015
GOP Clown Car Runs Into Ditch

DES MOINES, Iowa — The Republican Party's clown car has become a clown van. With nearly two dozen … Read More.

The GOP Angel of Death


The Grim Reaper is sharpening his scythe. With each rasp of the political whetstone, another Republican presidential candidate will be reduced to dust.

True, the first caucuses and primaries are still a year away. But there are far too many Republicans dipping their toes into the water. There are at least two dozen, which means at least 240 toes.

There is no way the media have the money to cover 24 candidates. Times are tough. The 2016 presidential campaign may be the first one that has more candidates running than profitable media companies covering them.

There is also no way political reporters can remember 24 names. Political reporters are lucky if they can remember where they left their rental cars.

And then there are the debates. How do you fit 24 candidates onstage? And how much time would each debate take? There are introductions, opening remarks, attacks, rebuttals, closing remarks and time for Rick Perry to try to remember his name. Each debate could take longer than the Academy Awards — and with a lot fewer (intentional) jokes.

No, the media will not allow it.

A little over three weeks ago, about 1,000 Republicans gathered in Des Moines, Iowa, at a political cattle call. A cattle call is like a straw vote but without the vote. Candidates prefer them because there is no final tally to humiliate them. Instead, the candidates can only humiliate themselves.

Which is what happened in Des Moines, where 24 candidates pounded out 10 hours of speeches without a rest break for the audience. Ten hours! And what purpose did it serve?

It got rid of Sarah Palin. On the Friday night before the event, she told a reporter she was "seriously interested" in running for president.

But the next day, she gave a speech of such rambling incoherence and such disjointed babbling that it sounded as if she were being simultaneously translated into a language from another galaxy.

Even her supporters were baffled. Their favorite theories about what had happened: Somebody had slipped Thorazine into her morning Froot Loops. Her body had been taken over by a Nexus-6 model replicant. She had taken seriously the advice of aides who told her: "Just be yourself, Sarah. What could go wrong?"

In any case, she has now gone from a hopeless candidate to a laughably hopeless candidate. The media will never take her seriously again.

The Grim Reaper has done his job.

But the big bloodletting will come this summer in Iowa, when its famous straw poll will be held.

The term "straw poll" comes from the British polymath John Selden (1584-1654), who wrote, "Take a straw and throw it up into the Air — you may see by that which way the Wind is."

The current governor of Iowa, a Republican, wanted to end the straw poll this year, ostensibly because it takes attention away from Iowa's first-in-the-nation caucuses. But the real reason is probably that the candidates are tired of wasting money on the straw poll.

That's because the Iowa straw poll is a delightful fraud in which candidates spend millions of dollars buying up blocks of tickets and then handing them out to hapless Iowans who are unlucky enough to cross their paths.

These ticket holders then find themselves stuffed onto buses and shipped to the straw poll site, where they are expected to vote for the candidate who brung them.

Hundreds of reporters cover the event, even though they inevitably whine about how "meaningless" it is because the winner of the straw poll almost never becomes president. (The only straw poll winner to get to the White House was George W. Bush, who won the straw poll in 1999 with 31 percent of the vote.)

What the media fail to appreciate, however, is that the straw poll is important because it creates losers. It is the Republican Angel of Death. It can be a one-way ticket to oblivion.

After the most recent straw poll in 2011, former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty came in third and found that so humiliating he dropped out of the race the next day.

In 2007, former Wisconsin Gov. Tommy Thompson came in sixth and dropped out.

And then there was 1999, when Pat Buchanan wandered around beforehand, talking to reporters and saying ebulliently of the straw poll, "I think it's going to kill off several people!"

It did. Including Pat Buchanan, who came in fifth and was so furious that he resigned from not only the race but also the Republican Party.

And I ask you: How can you desire anything more from an event than getting rid of Pat Buchanan?

Fortunately, the Iowa Republican Party has overruled the wishes of the governor and recently announced it is going ahead with the straw poll this year.

The Democrats? Democrats forbid straw polls because the polls are beneath their dignity.

And when you are beneath the dignity of a Democrat, you are really in trouble.

Roger Simon is Politico's chief political columnist. His new e-book, "Reckoning: Campaign 2012 and the Fight for the Soul of America," can be found on, and iTunes. To find out more about Roger Simon and read features by other Creators writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Web page at



2 Comments | Post Comment
Aren't you polite and respectful towards the Iowa governor.
I've heard him speak, I could not be as polite as you.
Funny thing about Pat Buchanan:
The most clear sighted vision on foreign policy, yet
so muddled in his visions of the grandeur of the Vatican.
Strange dude.
Worth listening to, though.
Not so, the governor of Iowa.
Comment: #1
Posted by: James Kossick
Tue Feb 17, 2015 2:34 PM
Sir;... As your piece revealed of Sarah Palin; Losers are not created, but discovered. There are a lot of girls who only look pretty from a distance where a kiss is out of the question, and the whole republican field is like that. If you grant that Mr. Obama has done very little for those who elected him, and has done little of anything, then you must agree that the only advantage republicans have is the lack of excitement any possible democratic candidate is likely to inspire. Republicans can tip the scales toward democrat victory just by nominating some one so boring and obnoxious that people will collectively join in their self protection. Any stuffed shirt like Rawmoney will do. Any feather brain like Palin will do. We are going to find out if big money can actually buy an election against the good sense and interest of the people. If the republicans expect to win they are going to have to nominate a democrat. Where they will find a democrat in their party right on all their litmus test issues, and- able to seem like a human being before the voters of America is still a mystery.
Comment: #2
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Tue Feb 17, 2015 11:28 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Roger Simon
Feb. `15
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 2 Mar 2015
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 28 Feb 2015
Susan EstrichUpdated 27 Feb 2015

23 May 2007 Do or Die in Ames

13 May 2011 Yes, We Can Fix Immigration

11 Jun 2010 The Return of Ask Dr. Politics!