opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Robert Scheer
Robert Scheer
5 Feb 2016
Crisis of Faith and Football

As a recently suffering Oakland Raiders fan, I greeted the death of Kenny "The Snake" Stabler with a cocktail … Read More.

26 Oct 2015
An Idiotic GOP Is Looking at the Wrong Thing in Its Clinton Probe

The Republicans on that committee investigating Hillary Clinton are idiots for focusing on decisions about … Read More.

19 Oct 2015
Bernie Blew It: He Sold Out Instead of Confronting Clinton

Bernie blew it. By embracing rather than confronting Hillary Clinton, Sen. Sanders fell into the trap of … Read More.

Why Do So Few Speak Up for Gaza?


Why are we so indifferent to the death and destruction in Gaza?

The major news outlets meekly accepted Israel's ban on entering Gaza as an excuse for downplaying collateral civilian casualties; our president-elect, Barack Obama, has said not a word about an invasion that will much complicate his future Mideast peace efforts; and most commentators easily rationalize Israel's many-more-eyes-for-an-eye killings.

How is it that there is such widespread acceptance, beginning with the apologetics of President Bush, that whatever Israel does is always justified as necessary to the survival of the Jewish state?

It is not.

While the Hamas rocket attacks are reprehensible, they are also an ineffectual challenge to Israel's enormous security apparatus, and the severity of Israel's response to them is counterproductive. Clearly, the very existence of Israel is not now, nor has it ever been, seriously challenged by anything the Palestinians did. Not back in 1947, when Israel was established as a state with insignificant Palestinian military resistance, nor at the time of the 1967 Six Day War, when Egypt, Syria and Jordan fought Israel.

The Palestinians were in no position to confront the Israeli army because those whose lands were not already occupied by Israel were living under oppressive Egyptian control in Gaza and tough Jordanian rule in the West Bank. After the speedy Israeli victory, which demolished the myth of the new state's vulnerability, the Palestinians became imprisoned as a people by Israel for crimes they had not committed.

Even if we accept the harshest portrayal of the tactics and motives of the Palestinian movements against Israel after the Six Day War, at what point did that terrorism represent a serious challenge to the survival of the Jewish people or the state that claims to speak in their name? Yet that survival is invoked to justify the vastly excessive use of force by the Israeli war machine, with frequent allusions to the Holocaust previously visited upon the Jewish people, a holocaust that had nothing to do with Palestinians or Muslims, and everything to do with Central Europeans claiming to be Christians.

The high moral claim of the Israeli occupation rests not on the objective reality of a Palestinian threat to Israel's survival, but rather on the non sequitur cry that "never again" should harm come to Jews as it did in Central Europe seven decades ago.

The basic argument is that Palestinian terrorists represented by Hamas are given to an irrational hatred of Jews so profound that it invalidates their movement, even when they win elections.

That was not the view of the Israeli security service when it earlier supported Hamas as the alternative to the then-dreaded PLO. Also, history is replete with examples of terrorists becoming statesmen, even within the early ranks of Jews fighting to establish the state of Israel.

One of those was Menachem Begin, who went on to be an elected leader of the new state. But before attaining that respectability, back in 1948 when Begin visited the United States, a group of prominent Jewish intellectuals including Albert Einstein, Sidney Hook and Hannah Arendt wrote a letter to The New York Times warning that Begin was a former leader of the "Irgun Zvai Leumi, a terrorist, right-wing, chauvinist organization in Palestine." The letter urged Jews to shun Begin, arguing, "It is inconceivable that those who oppose fascism throughout the world, if correctly informed as to Mr. Begin's political record and perspectives, could add their names and support to the movement he represents."

Begin's new party was then participating in the Israeli election, and Einstein and his colleagues, many of whom like him had been victims of German fascism, stated: "Today they speak of freedom, democracy and anti-imperialism, whereas until recently they openly preached the doctrine of the Fascist state. It is in its actions that the terrorist party betrays its real character."

Those actions were then detailed in the letter. They included the systematic terrorizing of innocent Palestinian men, women and children in an effort to force them to flee the territory that Begin's party claimed for the new state of Israel.

Clearly Begin and his political heirs, who include Benjamin Netanyahu, the most likely victor in the next Israeli election, evolved in their behavior. But I bring it up now to highlight the one-sided reporting of the current phase of this interminable conflict and to wonder: Where are the voices that reflect the uncompromising morality of Einstein's generation of Jewish intellectuals willing to acknowledge fault and humanity on both sides of the political equation?

Robert Scheer's new book is "The Pornography of Power: How Defense Hawks Hijacked 9/11 and Weakened America." E-mail Robert Scheer at To find out more about Robert Scheer, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Webpage at



3 Comments | Post Comment
The answer is in your article. Christian guilt.
Comment: #1
Posted by: liz
Thu Jan 8, 2009 12:06 PM
Re: liz
That and racial/ religous hatred for Arab Muslims. You can say things about Semitic Arabs that if said about Jews would be condemned as anti-Semitic but are not considered so due to that words definition leaving out more than90% of the world's Semites, Arabs. Besides, what better way to atone for your guilt than to have other Semites foot the bill?
Comment: #2
Posted by: michael nola
Thu Jan 8, 2009 5:58 PM
I do not support Gaza because it is simply a skirmish, almost a diversion. The main event can be traced back to the establishment of Israel. Those were highly emotional times. An emotional decision was made. Can anyone imagine a rational decision being made to establish a Jewish country on land lived on, claimed by , and surrounded by Arabs, the Jews enemy for millennia? The Israeli citizens and many Jews around the world are trying to carry out the wishes of their leaders. I feel sorry for Jews. They have a hopeless goal without even the satisfaction of being "right". They invaded Palestine.

Rational thought would move Israel to Texas, occupying about 1/35 of Texas, where Israelis would not have to fight to live. Their contribution to the world would no doubt be unprecedented. They are exceptional people.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Art Campbell
Fri Jan 9, 2009 2:50 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Robert Scheer
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Jim Hightower
Jim HightowerUpdated 10 Feb 2016
Roger Simon
Roger SimonUpdated 9 Feb 2016
Froma Harrop
Froma HarropUpdated 9 Feb 2016

1 Feb 2013 It's Good to be Goldman

28 May 2013 Congress Still Puts Out for Wall Street

21 Jan 2014 No Place to Hide: We're All Suspects in Barack Obama's America