opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Robert Scheer
Robert Scheer
5 Feb 2016
Crisis of Faith and Football

As a recently suffering Oakland Raiders fan, I greeted the death of Kenny "The Snake" Stabler with a cocktail … Read More.

26 Oct 2015
An Idiotic GOP Is Looking at the Wrong Thing in Its Clinton Probe

The Republicans on that committee investigating Hillary Clinton are idiots for focusing on decisions about … Read More.

19 Oct 2015
Bernie Blew It: He Sold Out Instead of Confronting Clinton

Bernie blew it. By embracing rather than confronting Hillary Clinton, Sen. Sanders fell into the trap of … Read More.

The High Price of Patriotism


It's over for the U.S. in Afghanistan, but that doesn't mean the death and destruction are about to stop. Quagmires don't just go away. The signs are everywhere, however, that the American course in that nation is doomed, that those directing this forlorn attempt at occupation of a country that has never tolerated occupation know there is no positive end in sight, and that the locals from President Hamid Karzai to the competing warlords and the Taliban are cutting their own deals on the assumption that our wishes no longer matter.

Predictably, the U.S. media dismissed Karzai's denunciation on Monday of the role of American mercenaries in the wanton destruction of his society. "Karzai rails against America in a diatribe," was the way a New York Times headline summarized his press conference, suggesting that his complaints were nothing more than the temper tantrum of an ungrateful child.

But Karzai is right. American mercenaries are spreading mayhem across Afghanistan thanks to enormous U.S. spending on the contractors that he has ordered out of the country.

"The money starts in the name of the private security companies in the hallways of the U.S. government," Karzai stated in a clear description of the modern working of our military-industrial complex, adding: "The profits are made and arranged there ... then they send the money to kill people here. ... When this money comes to Afghanistan, it causes insecurity in Afghan homes and causes the killing of Afghan children and causes explosions and terrorism in Afghanistan."

Our military investments recruit rather than combat terrorists, but that is not a bad outcome if the goal is greater instability as an excuse to keep defense spending absurdly high despite the end of the Cold War two decades ago.

Isn't that what it's all about? Our military budget, bigger than that of the rest of the world combined and higher in real dollars that at any time since World War II, is nothing more than a profit and jobs center for the defense industry, which has its tentacles in every congressional district. The invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan were never about combating terrorism, which is a supranational phenomena anchored in neither country.

Fighting terrorists who are armed with box cutters does not require sophisticated weaponry, including an enormously costly drone force, but instead effective international police work dependent on sleuths who have mastered local customs and languages.

But there's not much money to be made off that sort of gumshoe detective work, and that's why we have two hot wars going even though the al-Qaida enemy has left the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan.

Karzai's equally forceful defense at that press conference of his right to take money from Iran was another grievous blow to the American fantasy of using him to remake Afghanistan over in our image. "They do give us bags of money — yes, yes, it is done," Karzai admitted, adding the obvious: "We are grateful to the Iranians for this. Patriotism has a price."

Patriotism is always in the eye of the beholder, so why is Karzai's patriotism tawdrier than that of the executives of Lockheed and Boeing, who still build planes designed to evade Soviet air defenses that were never created? Karzai is now playing the patriot who will line the pockets of his most influential countrymen, and he has turned to another source, suspecting that our funding might come with too many strings attached.

He is proving to be a substantial leader, corrupt as he may be, in that he is no longer willing to play the puppet. This sort of rebellion happened before in Vietnam when Ngo Dinh Diem, the U.S.-imposed liberator, turned against us — and our CIA assassinated him. How long before Karzai meets a similar fate?

This fatal syndrome in American imperial designs is well known to Richard Holbrooke, President Barack Obama's key civilian adviser, who played a similar role in Vietnam. Back then, when Holbrooke was involved in the Phoenix assassination program (he now is involved with the drone assassinations), the reckless murder of civilians was aimed at winning their hearts and minds. It didn't work because we destroyed too many of their bodies in the process.

The arrogance of these adventures in nation-building represents an enduring example of America's deeply provincial and blindingly self-centered role in the world. That Holbrooke has learned nothing from his trail of deceit posing as diplomacy is not so startling given the obtuse nature of the man, but that Obama has entrusted this most critical aspect of his foreign policy to the likes of a hack like Holbrooke is truly depressing.

Robert Scheer is editor of, where this column originally appeared. E-mail Robert Scheer at To find out more about Robert Scheer, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Webpage at



2 Comments | Post Comment
Karzai is a patriot. He loves his country and wants to see it become better. What most in America call patriotism is more nationalism. They love their country not because their country is the place where they were born, as a parent loves a child or one loves ones family. No, it is more a love because they believe America is strong. Is the best nation on earth. Deserves to be best...
True patriotism is about loving ones country whether we are 1st or dead last. We love her because she is our home, our land. Nationalism is about power and control while true patriotism wants what will make us better even if less strong. That is why Karzai said what he said. He desires to see his people and country grow and become a better place to live. I am not saying Karzai is a good person. I am saying that unlike many Americans he is a good patriot.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Ephraiyim
Thu Oct 28, 2010 1:02 AM
Oh, how nobody can do it to you like one of your own.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Masako
Thu Oct 28, 2010 6:52 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Robert Scheer
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 8 Feb 2016
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 6 Feb 2016
Susan EstrichUpdated 5 Feb 2016

22 Jun 2011 Bill Clinton's Legacy of Denial

5 Jan 2012 Arms Dealer Obama Will Win by Default

24 Aug 2011 Amnesty for the Indefensible