creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Mark Shields
Mark Shields
19 May 2012
A Price Tag on Patriotism

Will Rogers was wrong. The legendary humorist, speaking of the responsibilities each of us has as a citizen … Read More.

12 May 2012
Shortcuts for 2012 Campaign

Please accept the following as a small token of appreciation from your semi-faithful correspondent, who knows … Read More.

5 May 2012
Slinging Mud

Indiana Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels was characteristically candid when speaking to the Indianapolis Star's … Read More.

Republicans Saw Off the Atlantic Seaboard

Share Comment

You call Tom Rath, the former New Hampshire state attorney general and longtime Republican national committeeman, because he is smart and he is quotable. Rath was upset that, after five terms in the U.S. Senate as a Republican, Pennsylvania's Arlen Specter — for his own political survival — had left their party to join the Senate Democratic majority: "Forty-five years ago, Barry Goldwater so disliked the Eastern establishment that he proposed sawing off the Atlantic Seaboard. In 2009, that's what the Republican Party is finally doing."

Don't just take his word for it. Listen to this from a prominent national Republican: "You can walk from Canada to Mexico and from Maine to Arizona without ever leaving a state with a Democratic governor. ... And on the East Coast, you can drive from North Carolina to New Hampshire without touching a single state in between that has a Republican in the U.S. Senate."

Those are not the musings of an academic — they are the blunt words from a speech to the Republican National Committee by the GOP's Senate leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, who warned: "(T)he Republican Party seems to be slipping into a position of being more of a regional party than a national one. In politics there's a name for a regional party — it's called a minority party."

McConnell's concerns were rejected by the nation's most popular radio talk-show host, Rush Limbaugh, who upon receiving news of the conversion, urged Specter to take Sen. John McCain and his daughter Meghan with him.

Contrast this with what a Democratic Party leader told me in 1995 when then-Colorado U.S. Sen. Ben "Nighthorse" Campbell, the Senate's only Cheyenne tribe member with a fondness for bolo ties and driving a motorcycle around Washington, deserted the Democrats for the GOP: "When the one Indian in the Senate with a ponytail and a Harley leaves your side to become a Republican, you know your party's in real trouble."

Lindsay Graham of South Carolina apparently believes, unlike Limbaugh, that politics is a matter of addition and not subtraction.

Graham told Fox's Greta Van Susteren: "Here's the challenge for the Republican Party. Can the person running in Pennsylvania win? ... I can't win in Pennsylvania. Rush Limbaugh can't win in Pennsylvania. If you're worried about turning the country over to the Democratic Party and not being a vibrant, relevant Republican Party, we need to find somebody that can win in Pennsylvania."

Which brings us to an iron rule: The vitality of a political party, or any organization to which people voluntarily belong, can be accurately measured by whether that party is spending its time, effort and energy seeking and welcoming converts or exposing and banishing heretics.

In 1980, the Republicans under Ronald Reagan's leadership were recruiting with open arms disaffected members of the opposition. Remember "Reagan Democrats"? In 2008, Barack Obama repeatedly courted Republicans and other non-Democrats to his campaign and cause. His efforts were rewarded in November when he carried independents, suburbanites and Catholic voters.

Those avenging Republicans who might prefer the recreation of another Salem tribunal must first confront these numbers. In 2005, there were 55 Republicans in the U.S. Senate. And with Democrat Al Franken of Minnesota almost certain to eventually be seated, there are now only 40 Republican senators. In 2005, there were 232 Republicans in the U.S. House. Today, there are 178.

Barely five years ago, according to the authoritative Pew national poll, 33 percent of voters identified themselves as Democrats and 30 percent self-identified as Republicans — just a three point difference and almost within the margin of error. In 2009, 35 percent proclaim themselves Democrats, while Republican identification has slipped badly to 22 percent — opening up a 13-point gap.

Rath and Graham, two grown-up politicians, understand from personal experience in the arena what too many in their party do not: Politics is always a matter of addition, not subtraction.

To find out more about Mark Shields and read his past columns, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.

COPYRIGHT 2009 MARK SHIELDS


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
Sir;...Your description of political parties as organizations to which people voluntarily belong is false...I could agree on the issue of vitality were it not always true that all forms not only include, but exclude...In the past, a society scapegoated one of its own with the sins of the community and put them out, or put them to death...I doubt that republicans exclude with a view to political victory, but instead, with an eye to ideological purity...They are forming up for the long haul... Hitler killed off Rohm, and the brown shirts to have purity of spirit...There was a slaughter of hangers on, spies, and half hearts by the Chinese Communists at the beginning of the long march... The ideological purists are not all that pure on the idea of capital, but on the idea of a Christian America they are dead set...And they do identity that pruity with capital and property, and they are dangerous, because as the saying goes: If you scratch an ideologue you find a terrorist....Ideas are not the best things in the world; but the most deangerous and poisonous...People who look for ideals like God reject the failings of average human beings... Some man like Specter trying to play the game as it has been described, as the art of the possible finds that all his compromise in the pursuit of conservative goals was being held against him...His enemies did not want success, which he often gave, but purity, and ideological purity such as no one has yet managed on this earth.....The goal of the ideologues in this land is victory or death...They will take over this government, this country or the world, and call it God's will... A little set back which is well deserved, of Mr. Specter giving up party to join the nation is nothing to those people....They are seeking larger game, heaven, eternity, purety, power...The give and take of government as a form, or of any relationship are beyond them...They intend to win, and Mr. Specter remains a target... Now; sir, there is nothing voluntary for most people in regard to parites...If they have a party we must have a party...Parties are outside the constitution, and they do not serve the people or the government...They serve themselves, and as the right ideologues show, there is no party loyalty when one is talking ideas....The parties have built their success on the ideas that naturally divide us, and now they have reached the point where division is becoming complete...We are recreating the divisions of history between rich and poor, between spiritual purist and the vulgar realists out of which have always come tyrants... Can we allow this??? How can we stop it??? The parties do not give us the ability to work out our differences, but are empowered by division, which they feed, and feed upon...Mr. Specter stepped out of the path of the Bull he helped to create...We should all be so lucky; but the fact is we cannot be... We cannot get rid of the parties and make government work, and if we could get rid of parties and government in one stroke there would be blood and war before we could once more have rational government...So do not confuse parties with any voluntary form...They have nothing in common...They are not a union of love, but a shotgun wedding...Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Sat May 2, 2009 6:37 AM
Mark, Great minds think alike. Check out this link.

http://politicsdmz.ning.com/forum/topics/why-the-democrats-hold-the

Rich Rubino
www,politicsdmz.ning.com
Comment: #2
Posted by: Rich Rubino
Thu May 7, 2009 6:35 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Mark Shields
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Tom Rosshirt
Tom RosshirtUpdated 26 May 2012
David Sirota
David SirotaUpdated 25 May 2012

28 Nov 2009 What Joseph Heller Could Teach Wall Street

9 Jul 2011 Republicans' Medicare Crisis

14 Jan 2012 Tolerant Americans 2012