opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Mark Shields
Mark Shields
28 Nov 2015
'Changing Places': The 2016 Election

Since 1952, there have been 10 national elections in which there was no incumbent Republican president … Read More.

21 Nov 2015
Early Returns From Ohio

COLUMBUS, Ohio — How important politically is Ohio? Of the nation's first 10 Republican presidents, … Read More.

14 Nov 2015
Henry Hyde and the 2016 Republican Race

Yes, it is true that, as a political reporter, you do find yourself liking some people you cover a lot more … Read More.

Oregon Makes Some History


In politics, the winners get to write the history. When Republican Scott Brown, in an authentic upset on Jan. 19, won the special election to fill the Massachusetts Senate seat held for 47 years by the late Ted Kennedy, the victors told us that the Brown victory unmistakably proclaimed the electorate's anger with one, or more, of the following: President Obama, his health care plan, the recession, Washington and its condescending indifference to ordinary citizens, Big Government, Big Deficits, Big Taxes, bailouts, Democrats and liberalism.

Barely one week later — before the ink was even dry on the new, global meaning of Massachusetts — the voters of Oregon did what they had not done in 80 years: With their state suffering under an unemployment rate of 11 percent and facing an estimated budget gap of $727 million, the state's voters, with an impressive 60 percent of them turning out — by a thumping 54 percent majority — endorsed an increase in the statewide income tax and raised the Oregon corporate tax rate.

Oregon voters are seriously tax-adverse. In the first state to make political decisions through direct democracy by ballot questions, Oregon voters have on nine separate occasions voted against imposing any state sales tax. Oregon is one of only five states without a sales tax. The last tax increase to win support was in 2002, when, to help pay for the Oregon Health Plan, the state's voters upped the tax on cigarettes. Since then, two statewide income tax hikes have been rejected at the polls.

So what does this entirely unorthodox "Tax Revolt " in Oregon mean? According to one of the winners, Steve Novick, 2008 Democratic U.S. Senate candidate and advocate-strategist for the winning "Vote Yes for Oregon" campaign, "Massachusetts was about (voters') anger" over how "messed up things were." Voters there demanded "to hold the people in charge responsible."

In Oregon, he says, "voters agreed things are messed up and we are going to do something about it." What they did was to raise the state income tax rate on the fewer than 3 percent of Oregon households that earn over $250,000 a year or individuals who earn over $125,000 annually.

The state's corporate tax, where two-thirds of the state's firms pay the minimum tax of $10 (yes, 10 dollars!), was also boosted.

Arguing that without the new taxes, the cuts to the 93 percent of the state budget devoted to public education, public safety and public safety net for children and seniors would be painful and unfair, the proponents — well-funded by teachers and public employee unions, and backed by a wide array of religious and civic groups — demanded that "big banks, credit card companies and the rich pay their fair share."

One TV spot consisted of separate indictments: Wall Street took billions in bonuses; bankers jacked up our credit card-rate; a lot of state corporations only pay the $10 corporate tax. Images of CEOs in private jets and luxury drove the message.

Veteran Oregon political strategist Pat McCormick, who opposed the tax hikes in the business-backed "Oregonians Against Job-Killing Taxes," conceded the winners "effectively tapped into populist anger."

Will success in Oregon — just for starters — embolden the Obama administration and Democrats in Congress to regulate, let alone tax, Wall Street and to make sure the Bush tax cuts for high-earners expire?

Kevin Looper, who managed the winning campaign, believes that others will take courage from what Oregonians did. "We registered 30,000 young voters, knocked on 300,000 doors, and we embraced people where they live. ... To make ours a better place, we all need to be less selfish."

Now that's a really different idea!

To find out more about Mark Shields and read his past columns, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at




1 Comments | Post Comment
We must all sacrifice, "but don't tax you, don't tax me, tax that fellow behind the tree." Oregonians resisted tax increases in sales tax, and general income tax, but when it could be aimed at 3% of the population, it sounded like a good deal. We'll see what happens to revenues and movements to other states. See Daly in Chicago.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Stephan Christiansen
Tue Feb 2, 2010 5:58 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Mark Shields
Nov. `15
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Froma Harrop
Froma HarropUpdated 1 Dec 2015
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 30 Nov 2015
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 28 Nov 2015

3 Nov 2012 Predictions You Can Bank On

13 Jan 2007 The President and the " S " Word

12 Mar 2011 The "Yankee Doodle Dandy" Defense