creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Mark Shields
Mark Shields
18 Feb 2012
What Endorsements Can Tell Us

The endorsement of a political candidate by another politician generally draws a well-deserved yawn from voters.… Read More.

11 Feb 2012
Religion Provides Added Value to U.S.

Without the courage and the constancy of Methodists and of Quakers, the struggle to abolish slavery in the … Read More.

4 Feb 2012
“He Could Have Been a Contender ...”

At the 1972 Democratic convention that nominated Sen. George McGovern of South Dakota for president, McGovern'… Read More.

New York and Carpetbaggers

Share Comment

One of the more bizarre rituals of American politics is the formation by an all-but-announced candidate for some pubic office of an "exploratory committee." In California, former Governor and current Attorney General Jerry Brown, who was first elected to statewide office 40 years ago — when Richard Nixon was in the White House — has announced his exploratory committee (what's left to explore?) for his expected 2010 gubernatorial campaign.

These committees are invariably stocked with incurable optimists who, wherever they explore, come back with the same sunny conclusion: Voters overwhelmingly want The Unannounced Candidate to run! Between the presidential election of Sen. John F. Kennedy in 1960 and Sen. Barack Obama in 2008, 36 U.S. senators, after getting a green light from their encouraging exploratory committees, ran unsuccessfully for the White House.

Which brings us to the interesting case of former five-term Memphis congressman and 2006 Tennessee U.S. Senate nominee Harold Ford Jr., who is, without a formal exploratory committee but with the urging of some prominent New York Democratic kingmakers, openly considering a 2010 U.S. Senate race in New York.

Not known for their warmth either to each other or to strangers, New Yorkers welcome outsiders and newcomers when electing U.S. senators. Sens. Robert F. Kennedy, Daniel Patrick Moynihan and Hillary Clinton were born, respectively, in Boston, Tulsa and Chicago. So the fact that Harold Ford is an interloper, or even a carpetbagger, probably will not hurt him with Empire State voters.

There is no 2010 Senate vacancy in New York. The seat to which Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was overwhelmingly re-elected in 2006 is now held by former Rep. Kirsten Gillibrand, who was appointed to the Senate by New York Gov. David Patterson.

Full Disclosure: I have known and liked Harold Ford since he was a young man.

How young? He was elected to Congress at the age of 26. But in an interview with The New York Times, Ford self-inflicted a wound that could cripple his political chances. This has nothing to do with Ford's House voting record, which by New York Democrats' standards might be deemed too conservative.

No, it's the simple 'what kind-of-a-guy-are-you' query. To the question all red-blooded New Yorkers face about their preference between the Big Apple's two professional football teams — "Jets or Giants?" — Ford in his answer did not mention any of the Giants greats ... no Tiki Barber or Lawrence Taylor or Y.A. Tittle. Nor did the names of revered Jets — Joe Namath or Marvin Powell or Curtis Martin — ever pass his lips.

No, this is what Ford said: "I have breakfast every morning when I am in town ... at the Regency. I see my friends the Tisches — Steve Tisch is my close personal friend. I have been to more Giants games. ... I had lunch over the holidays with Woody Johnson. We met for the first time. I am happy for his team."

Why this matters: The Regency is not your neighborhood coffee shop. It's a luxury hotel in Manhattan. Steve Tisch is the chairman and co-owner of the New York Giants, the man who received the trophy when the Giants won the 2008 Super Bowl. Woody Johnson is the owner of the New York Jets.

I am sorry, Harold, but authentic fans' loyal devotion to their team is not determined alone by who owns that team — or whether they know them socially. Maybe some eccentric tax-phobic conservative who demands a square deal for the Terminally Rich might, but no fans or primary voters living in the Bronx, Staten Island, Queens or Brooklyn.

New Yorkers have demonstrated a high tolerance for carpetbagger candidates for the U.S. Senate. But anyone who aspires to take a large bite politically out of the Big Apple must first understand that New Yorkers, like the great majority of Americans, root for their favorite team not because of, but in spite of, the people who own them.

To find out more about Mark Shields and read his past columns, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM

COPYRIGHT 2010 MARK SHIELDS


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Geez Mark. I luv ya, (I really do) but what in the world are you smoking? First of all, as a rare someone who sports a positive IQ in the world of commentary, do you think it might help to provide us with a denominator in connection with Senators who have used "exploratory committees" to get themselves elected? Thirty six is an impressive number, I guess, but I would sure like to know how many have succeeded with this approach, not to mention representatives from the House. I see an awful lot of this lately, sloppy reporting on the part of the press about numbers without acknowledging that you can't conclude much if you don't know the rate, which usually isn't bothered with because it's not sexy. I'm guessing that not too many have succeeded, but how do I know unless I invest a lot of time I don't have (nor does and nor does anybody else who isn't paid to do so) on the kind of research that was implied to be behind your comment.

Second, regarding Ford, so he should grease up and get more astute about pretending he's a man of the people? Nice thesis. This is what is increasingly nauseating me about the Democrats, frankly. They're just the same old thing, the vast majority at least, just dressed-up as members of a permanent Halloween party that's supposed to resemble an agent of change.

You've over and over again deftly conveyed the wrath of us plebes about the great deals banks got and continue to get, while they continue to give in turn zippo to the American Middle Class. Interest rates are going up, employment rates are not, livable loans are not being provided, and aren't we getting screwed yet again by our friendly spine-free incompetent-leader Democrats who sing a nice song and deliver nothing?
Comment: #1
Posted by: Masako
Sat Jan 16, 2010 7:39 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Mark Shields
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 18 Feb 2012
David Sirota
David SirotaUpdated 17 Feb 2012

6 Sep 2008 Debates Count More Than Running Mates

12 Apr 2008 How Long Can Both Parties Pretend About the U.S. Army?

25 Dec 2010 Which Event of the Past Decade Has Most Changed Your Life?