creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Mark Shields
Mark Shields
19 May 2012
A Price Tag on Patriotism

Will Rogers was wrong. The legendary humorist, speaking of the responsibilities each of us has as a citizen … Read More.

12 May 2012
Shortcuts for 2012 Campaign

Please accept the following as a small token of appreciation from your semi-faithful correspondent, who knows … Read More.

5 May 2012
Slinging Mud

Indiana Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels was characteristically candid when speaking to the Indianapolis Star's … Read More.

Big Crises Do Not Guarantee Big Leaders

Share Comment

The American national crisis emerges suddenly. The crisis brings doubt and anxiety among the people who instinctively turn to the president, who in turn is expected quickly to reflect, to decide and to act. But crises are no predictor of presidential greatness: James Buchanan, facing the secession of seven Southern states, vacillated — and history did not hesitate to deem him a mediocre chief executive. Buchanan's successor, the modest Abraham Lincoln, acted boldly, led the nation into war and preserved the United States.

Admiral W.F. "Bull" Halsey, the legendary World War II commander of the South Pacific area, once observed: "There are no great men. Just great challenges that ordinary men are forced by circumstances to meet."

Confronting unending Cold War challenges and crises, Harry Truman, a proud alumnus of the notorious Pendergast political machine of Kansas City, responded so resolutely and creatively that he earned ranking among the great presidents.

During his less than 17 moths in office, President Barack Obama has not wanted for crises. But the massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico well, which blew up 5,000 feet underwater, qualifies as both a national crisis and a presidential crisis.

Presidential blunders are quickly forgotten if — and only if — citizens can see the president, with confidence and firmness of purpose, effectively leading to the successful resolution of those crises.

Politically speaking, in a national crisis, there is no Opposition Party with whom an unsuccessful president can share the blame he might endure. This is not like any legislative battle between the White House and the Congress. There is no competing option to a president's plan of action, and there is only one grade given by the voters — and that is to the president.

For Democrats, the Gulf oil disaster prevents the discussion of any other public issue. This crisis takes the oxygen out of the room. Any attempt in this climate by Democrats to emphasize their commitment to "Jobs, Jobs, Jobs" is doomed.

In addition to confidence, forcefulness and sound judgment, the American president in crisis is expected to be the comforter in chief. In their "Paradoxes of the Presidency," Thomas Cronin and Michael Genovese call this role the "national chaplain." Ronald Reagan fulfilled this duty of the office so completely at the time of the Challenger tragedy.

Complicating the problems for this president and his party is that deep-sea camera showing around-the-clock live video evidence of the oil gushing relentlessly from the broken well. Congressional Democrats who had pressured BP, the oil company, to make the camera publicly available may now regret their success.

As of this writing, the images indicate that all public and private efforts have failed. Inevitably, this contributes to the widespread perception that government is not working and does not work.

Respected Democratic pollster Fred Yang reports that the voters' mood has moved beyond anger: "Their anger has given way to despair." Yang tells of a recent Indianapolis focus group where blue-collar men were complaining about the hyper-politics of Washington, where they saw a Democratic team and a Republican team whose respective members were only interested in scoring points for their side and not working cooperatively. Then, one focus group participant summed up the collective feelings: "There is really only one team in Washington. It's Them!"

It is clear. The disaster in the Gulf is not the only national crisis President Obama is confronting.

To find out more about Mark Shields and read his past columns, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM

COPYRIGHT 2010 MARK SHIELDS


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
First, let me finish your article. "........, and the President has failed to take bold action, and he has failed to provide the role of national chaplain." As a long-time lefty Democrat, I will continue to place my chip in the President's voting stack, however, I feel pretty let down right now. From the Supreme Court's decision to let corporations buy our elections, to the Wall Street captains' sacking our national treasure, to the oil barons' destruction of our environment, it would seem that the peoples' government is without substance. Worse, I no longer feel it will get much better with the next or subsequent elections.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Mike Ohr
Sun May 30, 2010 7:57 AM
Sir; ... no one can expect any president to fix broken govenment; and it is much more likely to find a pesident and any office holder willing to take advantage of the opportunities presented by broken Government... Mr. Bucahanan could not come to admit the constitution needed structural changes that would have produced war, or would have to result from war... Mr. Lincoln was already confronted upon taking office with a fractured society having no federal government to speak of in the South... Now; what is all too common is to deny problems while they can be denied; What Jefferson said, that: Mankind are dispossed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than right temselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed... What Jefferson said was absolutely correct, that people are reluctant to change their forms, and that it is themselves they must right before any social change would be possible... I must have been born with a rock in my shoe because I have found our old forms of government and economy hopelessly out of control and unresponsive to the needs of the people... It is way past time for a change, and Mr. Obama is not Superman...He bought into the status quo, and they bought into him... We can change things; but the tea partyers are correct in one sense... Until the old is trashed, the new has no hope of being... This society is done for... We have more hate for each other than love...We have all the evidence we need of a government unable to govern... It cannot govern to get the goods for which it was created, and it cannot govern its own excesses...This latest failure is not big enough yet, and does not effect enough people... We need some major meltdown...As long as govement can get out of its own way, people will accept it, and hope for better... That hope is unfounded... Government is done. We the people are done... There is no WE... Thanks... Sweeney
Comment: #2
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Sun May 30, 2010 2:32 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Mark Shields
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Tom Rosshirt
Tom RosshirtUpdated 26 May 2012
David Sirota
David SirotaUpdated 25 May 2012

26 Nov 2011 GOP Is Biggest Winner in Supercommittee Failure

10 Jul 2010 The Hazardous "Power of Appointment"

3 May 2008 Could This Be 1924 All Over Again?