creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Mark Shields
Mark Shields
11 May 2013
Advice for Graduation Day

Once again, graduation time is upon us. By some iron rule, every graduation must have a graduation speaker, … Read More.

4 May 2013
Story Too Good to Check Out

As generations of schoolchildren were told, Jamestown in 1607 was the first permanent English settlement on … Read More.

27 Apr 2013
A Square Deal for the Little Guy

To listen to the language of American political campaigns, you could reasonably conclude that "big" … Read More.

“Two Things Are Important in Politics"

Comment

Mark Hanna, a wealthy Ohio industrialist, while managing the winning presidential campaign of William McKinley put such a heavy arm on his corporate colleagues that McKinley's campaign out-raised and outspent Democrat William Jennings Bryan by more than 10 to one. Hanna knew whereof he spoke when he concluded: "There are two things that are important in politics. The first is money, and I can't remember what the second one is."

Extended stretches of my own youth and early middle age were spent happily, if not entirely triumphantly, working on political campaigns — which raised and spent many millions of dollars — in some 38 states and Venezuela.

Raising money politically turned me into an anti-Calvinist — convinced that God gave money to the least thoughtful and least appealing of her creatures. You have no idea how degrading it can be to fake interest while being subjected to some wealthy buffoon's nutty theory on how agnostics are conspiring to take over the world of polo or pork-belly futures.

Hanna would have loved the 2010 campaign, in which — thanks to a truly bizarre ruling by the Supreme Court earlier this year — interest groups have raised and spent unlimited sums from corporations and wealthy individuals without ever disclosing who gave a million or a grand. Over the last 38 years in American politics, because of campaign reform laws we went from incomplete and very fuzzy disclosure of campaign contributions and expenditures to nearly full-disclosure. Thanks to the John Roberts court, we are headed to a politics of no-disclosure.

Just consider what is happening in Iowa's First Congressional District (Davenport, Dubuque, Waterloo), where Democrat Bruce Braley, who received 65 percent of the vote in 2008, was favored to win a third House term. But that was before the American Future Fund, a 501(c)(4) group that can collect unlimited millions and is not required to disclose any of its donors, indicated it would spend at least $800,000 on TV and in direct-mail advertising attacking Braley's record.

And what if some of the charges the group levels against the Iowa Democrat are inaccurate and untrue? Sorry, there is no personal or institutional accountability.

There is no place to register your complaints — just a mailbox at a UPS outlet.

Braley is a formidable candidate, and he may well withstand the high-priced assaults from the anonymous, deep-pocketed interests. But some previously "safe" congressional incumbent will not be able to answer and rebut a million dollars in anonymous attack ads, and that, I can promise you, will have a profound impact on the U.S. Congress.

The first reaction of virtually every member of Congress will be: In order to prevent this ever happening to me, I will have to raise a campaign war chest at least twice as big as this year's. Washington will see an explosion in fundraising, which because the contributions will come from those with their own explicit agendas, will mean increased partisan polarization and further legislative gridlock.

Political courage, always scarce, will be depleted. Public officials will be even more scared about confronting the special privileges and abuses of any powerful interests with the potential or inclination to write a six- or seven-figure check to a group that does not have to disclose the contribution.

It's reasonable to assume that much of the money being given to these so-called independent groups (which fund Republicans over Democrats by nine to one ) is from wealthy individuals who want to preserve their significantly reduced tax rates from the George W. Bush era and to eliminate the inheritance tax on their personal fortunes.

"I think what we ought to do is we ought to have full disclosure, full disclosure of all of the money that we raise and how it is spent. And I think that sunlight is the best disinfectant."

Thus did GOP House leader John Boehner, on " Meet the Press" in February 2007, state the then-near-unanimous Republican principle of full, immediate disclosure, which has now been abandoned in the rabid money-chase for unreported millions.

To find out more about Mark Shields and read his past columns, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM

COPYRIGHT 2010 MARK SHIELDS



Comments

7 Comments | Post Comment
Dear Mark Shields... The more money has won the fight for control over our government the sooner it will be done... It is not a bad thing you talk about, though Mark Hanna was a bad man... Old forms get old and die because people convert their meaning into wealth and power, and use their power to convert even more meaning into wealth and power... Sooner than later, the people are going to look at our government and ask: Why should I fight it; why should I fight for it, and why should I invest a moment of time thinking about it... It is long past time to sweep all those people into the dustbin of history... We have the internet, and we could have a show of hands on every issue every evening...Instead of misleading us, government could serve to give force to the will of the people, and the people could be free to express that will on every issue...We do not need representative government, and we do not need the rich governing by proxy, giving the appearence of life to government by the strings they pull... We do not need them, and when government forces people to realize they can live without government, or will die without a government they themselves create by agreement -with a new constitution, then the old form will be buried and a new form raised... That is the story of all of history, for history is the story of changing forms; but Jefferson was correct; that we do not like to do it, and do it because we must, in the course of human affairs... He had formal consciousness... He used the word in the Declaration... He knew what he was talking about, and so must we if we will change our lives in something better than a haphazzard fashion... Let us think, talk, and then act to rid ourselves of a government that rides us, and takes from us, but never delivers the goods for which it was formed... Let us revolt...As long as it is still legal...Thanks... Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Sat Oct 16, 2010 6:31 AM
TFAR(TIME FOR ANOTHER REVOLUTION) From a Democracy to a moneycracy. supreme court sucks!
Comment: #2
Posted by: Ed Cool
Sun Oct 17, 2010 8:35 AM
Dear Mark Shields, As usual, you are right on point. I believe the people still hold the cards in this game. If enough people would take a stand and refuse to vote for ANYONE taking money from a source refusing to be identified, these special interest groups would quickly lose their value. Further, we could elect a legislature what could pass laws to impose the same standard for reporting on public figures as private citizens. Perhaps a Constitutional Amendment making it easier to remove federal judges and justices would be helpful, as well. What saddens me most is how for four decades I have witnessed so many leaders of the church I love so dearly, publicly spew out such caustic, divisive, and too often false or misleading statements about those with whom they disagree. How sad. We the People need to send a strong and clear message this election cycle. Not a message of Conservative, Liberal, Progressive, Republican, Democrat, but simply and purely American. That message should be, "We Won't Stand For Anymore Of IT!" Mark, I am a professional songwriter here in Nashville. Since I have no email address for you, I know of no other way to share this with you, but I have a song addressing this very issue that I recently put up on YouTube. The title is "Our House Aint For Sale" (exact spelling). If you find time, I wish you would give it a listen. It may not be your taste in musical style, but I hope you would find the message correct. Thank you for so many years of fair, accurate, and articulate reporting. When you speak on TV, ears perk up at our house. I am thankful for this forum. Sincerely, Gerry Phillips
Comment: #3
Posted by: gerry phillips
Mon Oct 18, 2010 6:31 AM
Americans don't care who is paying for what, as long as they can keep that warm feeling a sucker gets when someone sells him the Brooklyn Bridge.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Masako
Mon Oct 18, 2010 7:40 PM
Who benefits most from campaign contributions? The media, of course, which collects from all sides in every election.

The system itself is corrupt so nurtures and rewards corruption. This is why the federal government is imploding, because the illusion that we have anything resembling freedom, democracy, and capitalism is wearing thin. The US government has no credit or credibility with taxpayers. Our debt-backed dollar, created by the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, starts at the bottom line and goes down from there, creating an inherently dishonest system that can no longer sustain itself.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Katharine C. Otto, MD
Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:04 PM
Again, paternalistic liberal mush confessing a lack of faith in the PEOPLE to see beyond the liberal gods of money and lies. Americans delight in supporting underdogs.
Comment: #6
Posted by: cathy jones
Wed Oct 20, 2010 7:09 AM
I believe the internet will eventually assist in a revolt; people will start questioning their representatives, and things will change. The voters have to see that this is going to continue to be the best government money can buy. We have known that in the past, but it continues. Who has the money to buy it, certainly not us taxpayers. I think we need to bring the young into the fold somehow, since we have only begun to try and make congress accountable. This site and others like it are going to be how we connect, and come together, to make government work for us. There should be courses from middle school on up, on how our government works. What it does or does not do for you, how each vote counts, and how our generation has failed.
Comment: #7
Posted by: jackie wilson
Sun Oct 24, 2010 10:26 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Mark Shields
May. `13
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Susan EstrichUpdated 15 May 2013
Roger Simon
Roger SimonUpdated 15 May 2013
Robert Scheer
Robert ScheerUpdated 14 May 2013

28 Nov 2009 What Joseph Heller Could Teach Wall Street

7 Apr 2012 The 2012 Gerry Ford Test

6 Nov 2010 Democrats "In Recovery"