Wow, are we ever slow learners. At his second inaugural, some 72 years ago, President Franklin Roosevelt told us what we are still painfully learning in daily headlines about Wall Street financiers pocketing hundreds of billions of dollars in U.S. taxpayer bailouts but still rewarding themselves with close to $20 billion in year-end bonuses. This is what FDR said: "We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals; we now know that it is bad economics."
These Bonus Babies of Wall Street live by their own selfish rule: Privatize all profit, and socialize any and all loss. Last year, according to New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli, as reported by Ben White in The New York Times, brokerage units of Manhattan's financial companies lost some $35 billion. The companies that employed these financial geniuses, after invoking apocalyptic visions of imminent economic collapse and terrifying Washington into a three-quarters-of-a-trillion-dollar taxpayer-funded bailout, were and are still effectively on the public dole.
How could these master money-mavens — having been accomplices to this national financial debacle — morally, ethically or civically justify paying themselves bonuses? Sadly, too many on Wall Street know no shame.
Public outrage is building fast. Consider this: On last Thursday's "NewsHour With Jim Lehrer" on PBS, Harvard's Martin Feldstein, the former chairman of President Ronald Reagan's Council of Economic Advisors, a man of rock-solid conservative credentials and no advocate of government regulation of business, had this to say when asked about the latest Wall Street payday bonuses and any public reprisal: "I think where the government is actually putting capital into individual businesses, where the government is bailing out those specific businesses, then it has a different kind of authority to be able to request limits."
While a leading conservative economist gives a qualified green light to public intervention limiting the salaries and bonuses bailed-out bankers heap upon themselves, elected politicians — the same ones who imposed severe pay cuts on blue-collar American autoworkers as a condition of public loans to the auto companies — have been timid and reluctant to do the same for bankers.
Here is my formula.
Any private business that tin-cups the U.S. Treasury for a taxpayer-bailout to pay its bills, by definition, can pay no dividends until its taxpayer-bailout is paid in full. All transactions of that now public-private entity shall be fully transparent. Its books shall be available for scrutiny by its stockholders — the citizens of the United States. No employee of any bailed-out private company shall be paid more than the president of the United States, who earns $400,000 a year.
There will be no wailing tolerated about the "market's" inability to attract talented and gifted people to work for such slave wages. Because of the rocketing unemployment in the financial sector, there is not a pool of qualified talent looking for work, there is a veritable ocean!
No American has a more hazardous mission than a U.S. Marine Corps lance corporal who is a squad leader in Iraq or Afghanistan. His work, which keeps him away from loved ones for long stretches, is dangerous and demanding — death is no stranger. For all of this, he earns approximately $21,000 a year. Are we to believe that their fellow American citizens will not live and work in New York City for up to 20 times as much?
We know there is, sadly, precious little shame on Wall Street. But what about on Capitol Hill and in the White House? Do they not feel the rage of average Americans at this ripping-off of the taxpayers by arrogant, self-centered and taxpayer-subsidized individuals and companies? No more delays and debates. The time for tough federal action on these rip-off artists is now.
To find out more about Mark Shields and read his past columns, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.
DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.
COPYRIGHT 2009 MARK SHIELDS

|
 |
Comments
|
9 Comments | Post Comment
|
|
Sir;... God bless your hide; but your formula will not work, because the form of our economy does not work, and the form our our government does not work....Think for a moment of how seldom we see evidence of capitalism in the family... It may be seen in sit coms; but people do not profit on their families... People do not even profit from their communities....The form of our economy almost certainly means a self identification entirely different from that of the victims... Where are the community banks and bankers??? Were they too moral??? Did they show too much mercy??? Did they limit their profits so they were welcome in their communities???We have seen extreme profits...We have seen workers squeezed out of their rights, and expectation, and finally have seen them wave good bye to their jobs... For profit our industry was exported; but without industry we are no market, and certainly no bottomless well of profit... Yet credit is essential to every single activity from government to the movies...Where is the wealth to pay the interests??? Since the money originates with government, upon what basis are interests demanded, and what is the ultimate good of a fraction, not only feeding on, but running the whole society into ruin???You expect wall street to have a heart...Do you expect your calculator to show you love??? The thing has no feeling for this society... We are not their family...I doubt they are capable of social life as human beings are...From my experience, those who equate everything to money have no sense of value in emotions, in patriotism, in family, or in love... What they desire as symbols, we desire as realities; so you cannot expect these people on the basis of form or formula to behave any differently than they do.... People who live in the world of finance, and people who live in the world of law, or government -all labor under the burden of a neurosis... I say that because it is obvious, and not because I have experience as a professional... We need our communities... With communities we have morality... Without communities we can abstract morality into certain forms and formulas of behavior that others without the morality will as quickly find their way around...That has been our history, of setting up impediments to immoral financial behavior which people labor incessantly to surmount... They do not have the essential feeling of community to be members of society...For our part, we should not waste a moment trying to save the form of economy they have turned against us... We should not recreate their form in any fashion; but start over, and leave them out... They need to be rehabilitated...That will not happen so long as they lord over our lives and exploit us...Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Sat Jan 31, 2009 7:04 AM
|
|
|
|
Mark, Thank you for the Marine
analogy, please keep pounding home this supidity, they are making "chumps" of us once again but now we have a president who has a set. The upside down pyramid that sits upon the chest of average Americans has rolled over. Thank you for your work and I do love you showing up most Fridays with Jim Lehrer.
The only way I see that the foreclosure problem can be corrected is to have freddy and fanny start selling 2 and 3 percent 30 to 40 year mortages to anyone working or collecting umemployment THEN
this competition will stimulate the other banks to wake up or to hell with the private banks let them make loans to business only. Is there not an almost unlimited amount of people looking to rewite their
mortgages? Somebody could do quite well at a high volume LOWER PROFIT per mortgage business."A?"
Comment: #2
Posted by: Brian C. Jones
Sat Jan 31, 2009 9:31 AM
|
|
|
|
Dear Mark: We thoroughly enjoy yhour colums, and appearance on the News Hour. Keep up the great work. I wsh you David Brouks had youir own news show. We are also long time Notre Dame fans, and hope things turn out better next year GO IRISH/ Larry and Jean Walsh.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Larry Walsh
Sat Jan 31, 2009 11:05 AM
|
|
|
|
I agree completely, except those who have ALREADY accepted bailouts, then rewarded themselves, should be charged as THIEVES of Treasury funds, fined into POVERTY, and locked away from anything but prison work.
The next round of bailouts would have better results!!!
Comment: #4
Posted by: D. S. Edwards
Sat Jan 31, 2009 12:07 PM
|
|
|
|
I agree completely, except those who have accepted bailouts AND bonuses, should be charged as THIEVES,fined into poverty, then locked into prison labor!
The next bailout will then be more effective (Mr. Thain could take his $35,000 toilet into his cell!).
Comment: #5
Posted by: D. S. Edwards
Sat Jan 31, 2009 12:20 PM
|
|
|
|
Right on Mark Shields. Love the simplicity of the recommendation. It works.
Let's see if any Executive steps up and says that's for me.
I'm not holding my breath.
Comment: #6
Posted by: David Cohen
Sat Jan 31, 2009 2:13 PM
|
|
|
|
For eight years my frustration over how the system was dis-functioning grew nearly daily. I joined with millions and ousted the sources of that frustration in 2006 and again in 2008. Why, then, does my frustration continue unabated?
Comment: #7
Posted by: Mike Ohr
Sun Feb 1, 2009 8:00 AM
|
|
|
|
Thank you, again and again, for your thoughts and for the historical context in which you place them. Thousands of men and women in this country have gone off to a war based on lies, because they believe in patriotism, but the Wall Street thieves, and the industrial CEO's ( including so many in George Bush's "base") spout patriotism, while living comfortably in their gated commuinties and raking in the profits of their greed. " Greed, Unlimited" has become the major industry of this country. The jails of this country would be the perfect gated community for these criminals.
Comment: #8
Posted by: Katherine Scanlon-Pon
Sun Feb 1, 2009 6:41 PM
|
|
|
|
Mark, You Rock!
Comment: #9
Posted by: Indigo Hart
Mon Feb 2, 2009 7:56 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|