creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Lenore Skenazy
Lenore Skenazy
24 May 2012
The New Nanny Norm?

Our beloved nanny who worked for us for five years — Joan — called to say she's on the job market again.… Read More.

17 May 2012
Examining Jewish Doctors

The middle-aged lady is running frantically down the beach, waving her arms at the lifeguard: "Help, help!… Read More.

10 May 2012
The Slippery Slope of Parental Advice

At the risk of reading a lot — and I mean a LOT — into one cautionary little tale, today we … Read More.

What Happens When We 'Dangerize' Childhood

Share Comment

This has been a big week for pointing fingers ... at me. For murder.

I'm the lady who started a book, blog and movement, "Free-Range Kids," after letting my 9-year-old take the subway solo. He was fine — ecstatic, actually — but I got slammed for it. Since then, I've spent a lot of time pointing out that crime is actually LOWER than it was in the '70s, '80s and '90s (according to FBI statistics), which means our kids should be able to enjoy the same kind of childhood WE had — playing outside, riding their bikes, even walking to the dentist at age 8.

Then, this week, a madman murdered Leiby Kletzky, an 8-year-old who was indeed walking to the dentist in Brooklyn. And suddenly, the idea of Free-Range Kids sounds about as sensible as letting children ride their trikes along the interstate. As the headline on one of the big "mommy blogs" read, "Boy Abducted Walking Home Alone: Is Free-Range Parenting Dangerous?"

To which I would like to pose a different question, based on the fact that 25 times more children die as car passengers than as abduction victims (that is, about 1,300 children younger than 14 die in cars annually, whereas about 50 are murdered by strangers): "Is Putting Your Kid in the Car Dangerous?"

I ask because as a society, we have decided to focus on the least likely, most horrific, most TV ratings-garnering child deaths and base a lot of our parenting decisions on them. Gever Tulley, an educator in California, coined a term for this: dangerism. We decide, irrationally, which dangers are worth obsessing over and which we will shrug off as small, unavoidable risks.

So when I get a letter such as this one — "That little boy's parents should have known better than to let him walk alone at such an early age" — I have to stifle a scream.

The parents should have known better than to trust their city — my city, too — where we are enjoying the lowest murder rate since 1961? Known better than to trust their neighborhood, which the state assemblyman described as a "no-crime area"? Known better than to trust their 8-year-old when in most countries of the world, kids start walking to school at age 7? This is like saying the parents of the baby killed by a falling tree branch in Central Park last year should have known never to stand under a tree.

We have yet to dangerize a walk in the park.

But we are in the process of dangerizing any walk by any kid in any neighborhood, no matter how safe.

It is hard to get a grip on how uncommon a crime like the Kletzky murder is, because it is precisely those uncommon crimes that are exceedingly common on TV. They start out on the news and then get recycled in the crime dramas and "special investigations" and eventually the anniversary shows (smarmily marketed as "tributes"), to the point where the story becomes indelible. Then, when we ask ourselves whether it is safe for our kids to walk outside, up pops Lieby Kletzky's photo, like the top story in a Google search. And just like that Google search, it seems the most relevant, even though actually it is the least. It is so easily accessible because it is so rare. If it were happening all the time — like kids being killed in car crashes — we'd search for an iconic image and draw a blank.

So the next time someone tells me "I would NEVER let my child walk outside, because it's just too dangerous," here is how I will reply:

"I hope you NEVER put your children in a car. How could you ever forgive yourself if, God forbid, something terrible were to happen? It is YOUR RESPONSIBILITY to keep your children safe! Personally, I would rather have my kids stuck at home, unable to go anywhere, than take the TERRIBLE RISK of putting them in the car. It's just not worth a lifetime of regret."

That's how wacky — and stifling! — we can get when we dangerize everyday life. Let's try not to.

Lenore Skenazy is the author of "Free-Range Kids: How to Raise Safe, Self-Reliant Children (Without Going Nuts with Worry)" and "Who's the Blonde That Married What's-His-Name? The Ultimate Tip-of-the-Tongue Test of Everything You Know You Know — But Can't Remember Right Now." To find out more about Lenore Skenazy (lskenazy@yahoo.com) and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM


Comments

7 Comments | Post Comment
---And so WHY reinforce the Tavistock-Rockefeller 'programming for EUGENICS'
by giving it your spotlight?

Comment: #1
Posted by: free bee
Fri Jul 15, 2011 9:44 PM
Please ignore Free Bee; (s)he is a nut, and posts these bizarre non sequiturs for every story.

I agree with your main premise. I and my contemporaries were "free range" in the 1960s (although nobody remarked upon it). A new generation of parents have been conditioned into unrealistic fear.

But be careful with statistics. Yes, 1,300 children dying in car crashes is more than the 50 being murdered by strangers. But those numbers by themselves don't allow for a comparison; you have to look at the relative likelihood in each of those circumstances.

Car crash deaths of children: 1,300 out of literally billions of car rides per year.

Children murdered by strangers: 50 out of -- how many? instances of children being on their own amongst strangers. I don't know the number, but we can reasonably guess it's way, way lower than the number of car rides.

It would not surprise me if Situation B (child out on his own among strangers) is statistically more dangerous than Situation A (child in the car with guardian); in fact, I'd bet money on it. Doesn't mean it's too dangerous to consider.

Don't use statistics for your argument unless you understand them. I agree with your basic premise, though.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Steven Doyle
Sat Jul 16, 2011 6:25 AM
Mr. Doyle, it may be you who are being snookered by statistics. For the most part, it doesn't really matter how many rides per year are taken. The point is that we take those rides knowing the risk of dying in those rides is greater than the risk of dying from a whole lot of other things we seem to fear more and go a lot more out of our way to avoid.

And as for how you quantify hours of kids alone with strangers, or partly alone, or other highly relevant factors (what if the kid is supermarket Aisle A and Mom is in Aisle C? How about what kind of neighborhood you're in? How isolated or busy is the area? How mature is the kid you're talking about?), lots of luck punching away at your calculator and trying to do that.

We often treat risk irrationally, and in part it's because of what familiarity does to the human psyche. Safety experts worth their salt understand that point very well, and they spend a lot of time reminding people to take common-sense safety precautions that tend to be ignored over time because they protect against hazards people generally become familiar with and accept.

Conversely, we magnify or our response to heinous events like an abduction because they just seem so much more terrible and unthinkable than an ordinary fatal car accident.

We do not treat risk and how to deal with it very maturely in this society. Much of the media approach to it is with the infantile attitude that we have a right to live in a risk-free world. We don't. Just ask someone who lives in Iraq.

Accidents and tragic events happen, and that is just life in our imperfect world. We should place our focus on those we can REASONABLY take action to lower the probability of. In cases where we must choose between freedom and security, the issue Ms. Skenazy has highlighted, that's why we place value on individual freedom and choice in this country, isn't it?


Comment: #3
Posted by: Masako
Sat Jul 16, 2011 9:48 AM
I found this great website where we can read the comments of leaders such as Chuck Norris or Jim Hightower, then I was concerned when not only this person but others had posted bizarre comments. Would the prominent people view this area as whacked out and not worth their time? I'm glad you noticed the bizarre post also.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Mike Hayne
Sat Jul 16, 2011 9:52 AM
I found this great website where we could read posts by leaders such as Chuck Norris or Jim Hightower. I then noticed in the past week that a couple of people were writing bizarre comments. Would the prominent people view this site as whacked out and disregard it? I appreciate your comment regarding the trouble maker. What's the solution, just ignore? I guess.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Mike Hayne
Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:20 AM
You're an idiot. You think just because nothing bad happened to you or someone you know that things were safe back then. That's total crap. Predators have always been around. Being safe than sorry is a good rule of thumb when it comes to children. I'm sure if your kid gets abducted you'll be singing a different tune but by then it will too late and you would have contributed to the harm that has befallen your kid. Plus, just the fact that you think a child has the proper tools to make good judgements is absolutely ridiculous. You're a complete moron and a danger to your kid. Stop breeding.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Diana
Mon Jul 18, 2011 9:55 AM
I love you!
Comment: #7
Posted by: Holly
Mon Jul 18, 2011 12:17 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Lenore Skenazy
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Tom Rosshirt
Tom RosshirtUpdated 26 May 2012
David Sirota
David SirotaUpdated 25 May 2012

11 Mar 2010 Take a Tip From Me (Please!)

17 Apr 2008 'America's Worst Mom'?

26 Jan 2012 (Extremely Random) Thoughts on the Oscars