creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Lenore Skenazy
Lenore Skenazy
24 May 2012
The New Nanny Norm?

Our beloved nanny who worked for us for five years — Joan — called to say she's on the job market again.… Read More.

17 May 2012
Examining Jewish Doctors

The middle-aged lady is running frantically down the beach, waving her arms at the lifeguard: "Help, help!… Read More.

10 May 2012
The Slippery Slope of Parental Advice

At the risk of reading a lot — and I mean a LOT — into one cautionary little tale, today we … Read More.

Slacking Hillary

Share Comment

Legs.

A campaign needs them. A pantsuit hides them. Might Hillary Clinton be giving a very different speech Saturday if only she never packed that first fatal slacks-and-jacket ensemble?

In other words, if only Yves Saint Laurent hadn't come along and changed the way powerful women dress?

After all, until Saint Laurent, who died Sunday, sprang onto the fashion scene, the only women who wore pants were the ones riding horses, planting bulbs, or busy being Marlene Dietrich.

Marlene wore trousers and a top hat and wrapped men around her little finger — even if she was more interested in women. Voracious, German, Angelina without the baby bump, she was supposedly Saint Laurent's inspiration.

And you wonder why Hillary's stump outfit makes men cross their legs.

Saint Laurent unveiled his pantsuit in 1966 — the very era Hillary came of age. For a lot of us who remember those days (if only faintly because we're younger!), the suit represented more than just another outfit option. It represented equality.

Until I was in third grade, girls at my public school were required to wear skirts or dresses. In Chicago. In the winter. Fashion historian Nancy Deihl recalls that as late as 1971, when she was in sixth grade, "(she) got sent home for wearing pants under (her) dress because it was really cold."

To us, the personal was pant-litical. Until we got to wear pants, we were second-class citizens, with goose bumps. That's why, to this day, the pantsuit equals something we love: feminism. But to a lot of others, the pantsuit represents something they loathe.

Feminism.

Of course, they never would admit it, but that's what's going on. The pantsuit is, if nothing else, a Rorschach test. The ones who find it "ugly" or "unappealing" have all sorts of totally contradictory reasons.

"Have you ever seen Sarah Jessica Parker in one?" the co-author of "The Art and Power of Being a Lady," Dini von Mueffling, asked.

To her, the pantsuit is what women wear when they don't want to shine — pathos on parade.

But for others, it's more nefarious. "Camouflage," as one blogger asserted. He assumes Clinton wears her pantsuits to hide her chunky legs. In fact, mention "Hillary" and "pantsuit," and there is so much talk about her legs she might as well be campaigning in hot pants.

Still others think she's wearing the suits to blend in with the men running for president. Like that's really likely: "I'm voting for the guy who's married to Bill. Wha … she's a woman ?"

"The concern with pants is really deeply embedded in our society," said women's studies professor Kathleen Lawrence. When people ponder Clinton's pantsuit penchant (and they do), "I think they see it as her rejection of the alternative" — a skirt or dress — Lawrence said. That way, they end up thinking she's not only ideological but also completely inflexible.

That inflexibility (like most inflexibility) is what ended up making Hillary the butt of so many jokes. Google "pantsuit" and "Clinton," and you get 376,000 hits — about half of them from David Letterman.

When she was riding high last summer, Hillary went on his show and declared, ha-ha, campaign promise No. 1: "One more pantsuit joke and Letterman disappears."

But just a few days ago, she was back, humbly offering the top 10 things she loves about America. No. 8: "Thanks to the Internet, I can order new pantsuits 24/7. There's your pantsuit joke, Dave. Are you happy now?"

Of course he is. He's got her defining herself on his terms, as a lady bent on making herself look ridiculous. "To raise money, Hillary entered a wet pantsuit competition," he chuckled the other day.

To women — and men — who appreciate the freedom Saint Laurent bequeathed us, the Hillary-pantsuit debate is a reminder that women may wear pants today, but plain old chauvinism still has legs.

Lenore Skenazy is a columnist at The New York Sun and Advertising Age. To find out more about Lenore Skenazy (lskenazy@yahoo.com) and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

0 Comments | Post Comment
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Lenore Skenazy
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Tom Rosshirt
Tom RosshirtUpdated 26 May 2012
David Sirota
David SirotaUpdated 25 May 2012

21 Oct 2010 The Scariest Thing About Halloween

30 Jul 2009 My Health Care Plan

11 May 2007 America's Princess, Paris Hilton