opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Joe Conason
Joe Conason
27 Mar 2015
Country Music, Tea Party 'Populism,' and Ted Cruz

Nobody who knows Ted Cruz — the Texas freshman Senator who became the first official contestant for the … Read More.

20 Mar 2015
Measuring the Moral Posture of Rand Paul

Expecting morally serious debate from any would-be Republican presidential contender is like waiting for a … Read More.

13 Mar 2015
Media's Email Hysteria: Why Are Republicans Exempt?

It is almost eerie how closely Hillary Clinton's current email scandal parallels the beginnings of the … Read More.

Romney's Budget-balancing for Dummies


Seeking applause from a right-wing audience in Michigan, Mitt Romney vowed on Saturday: "I will cut spending, I will cap spending, and I will finally balance the budget," saying that he will end federal funding for all the usual Republican budgetary scapegoats — the Public Broadcasting System, the National Endowment for the Arts and the National Endowment for the Humanities. He has said much the same thing many times in recent months, hoping to woo the tea party extremists who keep rejecting his candidacy.

But Romney must think these "conservatives" very stupid if he's promising to balance the federal budget by eliminating nominal amounts spent on the nation's cultural programs. And he must think they're even dumber if they believe he can do that while delivering the massive tax cuts and defense increases he has also promised. As a former corporate investor and state governor, he certainly knows that his numbers simply don't work.

Or at least not in the foreseeable future, as the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget explained in a study of Romney's latest tax plan. Rather than bringing the budget into balance, as he has repeatedly promised, that plan would substantially increase the national debt over the coming decade by reducing taxes on people like Romney himself — the wealthiest 1 percent.

"Estimated roughly, ignoring interactions and microdynamic effects, we find that without offsets Gov. Romney's plan on the whole would increase the debt by about $2.6 trillion," according to the nonpartisan committee. The roughness of that estimate was unavoidable because Romney's plan leaves out most of the vital details — such as which tax loopholes he would close and which vital programs and entitlements he would cut.

It is full of tax cuts pleasing to gullible Republican audiences, but not much else.

So far, the hints that Romney has offered about proposed changes to the budget would increase rather than reduce deficits. Aside from his tax cuts — which represent an even bigger orgy of irresponsibility than the George W. Bush cuts — Romney often insists that he will substantially increase rather than reduce the defense budget, raising the total spent as a percentage of gross domestic product from 3.8 to 4 percent. That doesn't sound like much until someone does the math, which results in an additional $40 billion or so annually. Again, there are few substantive details so far, except his promise to build another 15 Navy warships annually, at a cost of roughly $21 billion alone.

Eventually all the unbridled spending that Romney wants to enact on tax breaks for his rich donors and yet more Pentagon waste will add up to real money — unlike the cuts he has loudly aimed at the country's cultural programs. Total annual spending on the National Endowment for the Arts, the National Endowment for the Humanities and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting — all hated by "conservatives" who behave like vandals intent on sacking the national heritage — amounts to less than $700 million, with an "m."

In a national budget of nearly $4 trillion, with a "t," $700 million is a truly meaningless amount, representing some miniscule fraction of military cost overruns. And Romney — our new Spartan leader who avoided the draft in France — surely knows that, too.

So why does he talk about those cuts and avoid discussing the real tax increases and spending reductions that would be required to balance the budget? He seems to think that his tea party audiences can't do simple arithmetic. He may well be right.

Joe Conason is the editor in chief of To find out more about Joe Conason, visit the Creators Syndicate website at



1 Comments | Post Comment
This author is correct. Republicans are not true "conservatives" and the tea party has been indoctrinated into the republican party. There is just as much wasted resources in the defense budget as in the whole. An example of this is a $270,000 soccer field. I wont say all the other waste I have seen the last 18 years as a member of that defense budget because its a possiblity that this is being monitored. THis brings me to my second point of why Republicans are psuedo -"conservatives". Examples include the PATRIOT ACT and The National Defense Authorization Act. It is not a conservative principle to piss on the constitution. Also when was the last time congress has officially declared war in accordance with the constitution? WWII. The current Republican Party is ruining the brand and do not provide sufficeint contrast with social progressives. So lets hope that some election year Americans true look to see which presidential candidate read the constitution, understands the constitution, and plans on obeying the constituion. Lets hope this happens before its to late.
Comment: #1
Posted by: SCOTT
Fri Mar 2, 2012 7:29 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Joe Conason
Mar. `15
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Froma Harrop
Froma HarropUpdated 2 Apr 2015
Roger Simon
Roger SimonUpdated 1 Apr 2015
Jim Hightower
Jim HightowerUpdated 1 Apr 2015

26 Jan 2012 Mitch Daniels: Bombast From the Past

20 May 2011 The Gingrich Style

6 Jun 2014 In Bergdahl Case, 'Conservatives' Ignore Basic American Principles