opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Joe Conason
Joe Conason
29 Jan 2016
Is There Only One True Progressive?

In our polarized politics, the Democratic Party is trending leftward — not as sharply or as rapidly as … Read More.

22 Jan 2016
The Man Who Drowned Democracy With 'Sewer Money'

This week marked the anniversary of the Citizens United decision, which exposed American democracy to … Read More.

15 Jan 2016
New York Values: What Tiny Ted Will Never Get About the Big Town

Exactly what does Ted Cruz mean when he sneers about "New York values" as a reason to reject Donald Trump? … Read More.

In Baseless Persecution of Rice, Republican Reputations Will Sink


With the Republican right persisting in baseless persecution of Susan Rice, the U.N. Ambassador who may replace departing Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, it has left President Obama little choice but to move ahead with her nomination. If he backs away from Rice, in the face of what he has called false accusations against her, that display of weakness would undermine his second term before it begins.

The opposition to Rice is cobbled together from the remnants of a failed "October Surprise" election gambit, which began when Mitt Romney sought to smear the president by using the tragic attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, which killed four Americans, including Ambassador Christopher Stevens. In the election's aftermath, Senate Republicans have fixated on Rice, whom they accuse of misleading the public in television appearances several days after the Sept. 11 incident.

Rice's supposed offense was to downplay the likelihood that the attack had been perpetrated by al-Qaida terrorists or their local allies, while underlining the idea that it had been inspired by an anti-Muslim video on the Internet. On ABC News' "This Week," she repeated almost precisely the talking points provided to her by the CIA: Our current best assessment, based on the information that we have at present, is that, in fact, what this began as, it was a spontaneous — not a premeditated — response to what had transpired in Cairo. In Cairo, as you know, a few hours earlier, there was a violent protest that was undertaken in reaction to this very offensive video that was disseminated. We believe that folks in Benghazi, a small number of people came to the embassy to — or to the consulate, rather, to replicate the sort of challenge that was posed in Cairo.

And then as that unfolded, it seems to have been hijacked, let us say, by some individual clusters of extremists who came with heavier weapons, weapons that as you know in — in the wake of the revolution in Libya are — are quite common and accessible. And it then evolved from there. We'll wait to see exactly what the investigation finally confirms, but that's the best information we have at present.

In those remarks, Rice clearly warned against drawing any conclusions from the preliminary information then available. Nevertheless, Senate Republicans led by John McCain have sought to defame her as a liar, a fool, or worse. The latest insult came on Tuesday from Senator Kelly Ayotte, a junior Republican from New Hampshire with no significant national security experience and little evident grasp of the facts.

Tagging along with the embittered McCain and his reliable sidekick Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Ayotte made an unprecedented threat to put a "hold" on Rice's nomination if Obama sends it up to the Hill — the first time in memory that a senator has deployed that privilege against a prospective nominee to head the State Department.

Exactly what the right suspects about Benghazi isn't clear. Initially, Republicans seem to have hoped that talking up al Qaeda would somehow help Romney and damage Obama. Not the most patriotic strategy, but that was their plan. What they supposedly suspect now remains obscure. Graham mutters darkly that he is "disturbed," while McCain claims to be "troubled." The blustering Ayotte has now locked herself in a bunker with these volatile characters, whose motives and behavior are hardly above suspicion.

Whatever their problem, knuckling under to such a puerile challenge would represent an unacceptable defeat for the newly re-elected Obama.

Properly, the Benghazi incident is under investigation by the FBI and the CIA as well as Congressional committees — and what those probes appear to have established so far is that the security arrangements at the consulate never came within the specific purview of the White House. The CIA almost certainly made mistakes and omissions in protecting the consulate and sadly paid for those errors with the lives of courageous agency officers who died there trying to protect the State Department staff when the compound came under sustained assault from heavily armed jihadi militants.

The notion that Rice or any other administration official intentionally misled the public already has been thoroughly debunked by David Petraeus, the resigned CIA director. Petraeus told a closed-door hearing on Capitol Hill, attended by McCain, that Rice had faithfully followed the declassified talking points provided by U.S. intelligence agencies. (McCain promptly fled from reporters when that hearing ended.) Although the president himself had referred to the Benghazi attack as an "act of terror" in the White House Rose Garden, specific information about potential terrorist suspects remained classified for sound investigative reasons.

It isn't hard to imagine what McCain would say if Rice had accidentally blurted out classified details of the Benghazi probe prematurely on television. In fact, it isn't necessary to imagine, because not so long ago, he angrily accused the White House of revealing classified information. But in fact, the only damaging leak in the Benghazi matter emerged from the hyperactive mouth of Rep. Darrell Issa, chairman of the House Government Reform Committee.

Perhaps McCain, Graham and Ayotte should instead spew their bile on Issa, who has actually abused his authority and trifled with national security. They would be better off, because their reputations — and not Rice's — will be irreparably damaged if they continue to pursue this vendetta when the president sends up her nomination.

To find out more about Joe Conason, visit the Creators Syndicate website at



3 Comments | Post Comment
Joe, they couldn't give a damn about what Ambassador Susan Rice did or didn't do or what occurred in Benghazi. They want John Kerry's Senatorial seat which is why they are damning Susan and praising Kerry. Elizabeth Warren's win in Massachusetts was a hard loss for them, and McCaan in particular. Strange group these Republicans, when Kerry ran for President they said he wasn't good enough to be dog catcher, now they sing his praises as they lust after his Senatorial seat.
Comment: #1
Posted by: morgan
Thu Nov 29, 2012 5:49 AM
Morgan. You give Republicans almost God like powers of precognition. When Benghazi happened how did Republicans know that John Kerry was going to be nominated for Secretary of State? Heck President Obama has not even made a nomination to date. Think about this why would Republicans want to confirm Rice who has proven herself to be liberal hack of the greatest degree. I mean having absolutely nothing to do with Benghazi, the handling of security affairs at any embassy, or any knowledge of terrorist activities (confirmed by statements made by the administration), why would she agree to go on television and misinform the American people. She knew she was a fall guy and she willingly stepped into the situation. Why send her instead of someone who actually knew something? Why not send out Hilary Clinton who is responsible and as an added bonus is leaving office? I know because that might affect her ability to run for President in 2016. Benghazi is the huge foul smelling pile of misinformation from this administration; it has been from the very first. The Republicans are being accused of using this as political fodder but Democrats got there first. I'm sick of all of this. Americans died in Benghazi and nobody did a thing about it despite having plenty of assets available to help.
Comment: #2
Posted by: david
Thu Nov 29, 2012 6:55 AM

That the Republican right, as you say, has left the President "little choice but to move ahead with [Susan Rice's] nomination," is a sad fact indeed. But I do not believe it is inevitable. Real leadership would be for the President to pick the best person for the post, rather than be led by the nose because of a protest he has no taste for.

It would be a shame not to have the benefit of John Kerry, de facto ambassador for the administration, and head of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, in that post. He has both the background and temperament for the job--thoughtfulness, wisdom, and deep, wide experience. He is highly regarded by members of the international community.

While people say that vacating his senate seat to be Secretary of State would open the way for a Republican, Scott Brown, to take over, I don't believe that would be inevitable. (The same people also say that John Kerry could be Sec'y of Defense, ignoring the fact that that too would involve vacating his seat).
Comment: #3
Posted by: Jane
Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:16 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Joe Conason
Jan. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 8 Feb 2016
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 6 Feb 2016
Susan EstrichUpdated 5 Feb 2016

24 Apr 2013 The Newsmaker Memo: An Interview With Pioneering Climate Scientist James Hansen

22 May 2013 Benghazi Interview: Pickering Dissects Congressional Follies, Media Coverage and 'Cover-Up' Charges

3 Dec 2009 The Crushing Legacy of Bush and Cheney