opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Joe Conason
Joe Conason
20 Nov 2015
Why ISIS Needs the 'Useful Idiots' Who Demonize Muslims

When France's Prime Minister Manuel Valls said after last Friday's attacks in Paris, "nous sommes en guerre" &#… Read More.

13 Nov 2015
Hard Questions for Debating Democrats

Imagine for a moment that the purpose of a presidential debate is to elucidate policy differences on matters … Read More.

6 Nov 2015
What Socialism Means to Bernie -- and You

Once upon a time, socialists running for president in the United States had to explain that while they had no … Read More.

How (and Why) to Co-opt Those Cops on Wall Street


The young (and not-so-young) protesters who came to Occupy Wall Street — and have stayed despite mass arrests — deserve thanks from the "99 percent" of Americans they claim to represent.

Without articulating a clear set of demands, they have nevertheless voiced the frustration felt by millions of ordinary people who have lost homes, jobs, income and security in the post-crash economy and see little help coming from government offices or corporate suites. Soon, however, someone will have to decide whether Occupy Wall Street eventually concludes in mere symbolic success, which would be little more than glorified failure, or evolves into a powerful political current that can rival the tea party.

If the pivotal moment of this protest continues to be a video of a high-ranking police officer brutally "macing" innocent women, then it is unlikely to grow far from its anarcho-bohemian roots. There are simply too many Americans who will never side with "hippies" against cops, no matter how wrong the cops may be. But if the sympathetic statements from labor leaders of the past few days turn into supportive action — and if teachers, bus drivers, firefighters, nurses and, yes, police officers show up to demand change — then this could be the beginning of something very, very big.

Don't scoff too quickly: Last winter, hundreds of off-duty law enforcement officers from around Wisconsin repeatedly joined the statehouse sit-in against Gov. Scott Walker's attack on labor, even though their own unions were exempt from his proposed law — and even as their fellow officers were standing guard over the protesters.

In those circumstances, the cops were just as capable of understanding the stakes behind the protest as any other workers, or the students who supported them. A policeman who had retired from the Madison Police Department after 20 years on the force explained to USA Today that "we all see this as union busting and wage suppression.

This is a long-term, downward spiral of wages for working families."

Such progressive insights probably don't fit the anarchist stereotype of the cop, whose enmity is cherished as a token of the alienated lifestyle. But not all of those who have flocked to Zuccotti Park and the other protest sites that have sprung up around the country are committed to political irrelevance as proof of authenticity. Many, perhaps even a majority, might be intrigued by an opportunity to provoke something more significant than a cloud of tear gas or a court summons.

The protesters have serious grievances, from mass youth unemployment to burdensome student loans that cannot begin to be paid off if there are no decent jobs.

What would happen if they began to articulate the connections between their own problems and the assault on the living standards of public employees and unionized workers? How would the angry middle class respond if the "kids" made common cause with those downwardly mobile working families — demanding debt relief for everyone, a special prosecutor for the financial crooks and higher taxes on those who have profited from the crisis? Why shouldn't the students (and former students) stand with teachers against cuts in education and for rebuilding public schools and colleges? Even those who understandably disdain partisan politics, with its endemic money corruption, could swiftly change the direction of the national debate.

It is encouraging that many young activists came down to Wall Street from Wisconsin, where they have conducted themselves with impeccable style and effectiveness. Four decades ago, the goons in Richard Nixon's White House egged on construction workers in downtown Manhattan to beat up antiwar students, who had allowed themselves to be portrayed as enemies of working-class soldiers and cops. Repeating that same mistake now would be tragic for everyone — except the 1 percent.

Joe Conason is the editor in chief of To find out more about Joe Conason, visit the Creators Syndicate website at



1 Comments | Post Comment
As a Libertarian from Bucks County PA, it may surprise you that I am also a Unionist. While I understand the general stance that most Libertarians take on Unions, I couldn't disagree more. When ever there is a majority of Americans working for the owners of companies, you have to give workers a chance to defend themselves. Unions are the only way to do that right now without major Gov't intervention. Stand with the 99%! Americans are more important than party, unless you are the 1%.

Comment: #1
Posted by: Michelle Brixius-Kasich
Thu Oct 6, 2011 8:28 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Joe Conason
Nov. `15
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 30 Nov 2015
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 28 Nov 2015
Ted Rall
Ted RallUpdated 27 Nov 2015

17 May 2007 Beware Murdoch's 'Necessary Promises'

13 Nov 2008 Who's Afraid of a Filibuster?

13 May 2011 The Return of the Real McCain