opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Jim Hightower
Jim Hightower
10 Feb 2016
How Corporate Bamboozlers Intend to Widen Inequality in America

The basic problem facing the corporate and political powers that want you and me to swallow their Trans-… Read More.

3 Feb 2016
What Really Poisoned the Water in Flint, Michigan

The mantra of every Koch-headed, right-wing politico is that government should be run like a business, always … Read More.

27 Jan 2016
Take the Movement to the White House

At a recent dinner with my work team, I was reminded that I had said I wanted to travel less for work this … Read More.

Power From the Banks and to the People


Populist banker. Now those are two words you rarely see linked together.

But Thomas Hoenig, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, truly is a rarity. Firmly rooted in small town Iowa and Kansas, he has never aspired to be part of the Wall Street-Washington power elite, and he has no hesitancy to challenge their financial orthodoxy and obsequious kowtowing to the preening barons of big banking.

In a recent New York Times op-ed piece, Hoenig laid into the claims by the political and financial establishment that the massive taxpayer bailout and subsequent regulatory "reforms" of Wall Street have fixed the banking system. Let me give it to you in his own words: "After this round of bailouts, the five largest financial institutions are 20 percent larger than they were before the crisis. They control $8.6 trillion in financial assets — the equivalent of nearly 60 percent of (America's) gross domestic product. Like it or not, these firms remain too big to fail."

How big are they? So enormous, says Hoenig, that "their chief executives cannot manage them, nor can their regulators provide adequate oversight."

And, countering the contrived contention of the Washington-Wall Street axis that only huge banks can compete globally, Hoenig points out that our banking system must be structured to serve our national interest, not the insatiable self-interests of multimillionaire bankers and billionaire speculators. Again, his own words: "More financial firms — with none too big to fail — would mean less concentrated financial power, less concentrated risk, and better access and service for American businesses and the public."

How about that? A big-time banker who wants to shrink the giants of Wall Street, believing that bankers should serve us, rather than vice versa. There's an idea we can all get behind.

And, it looks like we have another odd bedfellow in our corner. The teabag-infused Republican takeover of the U.S. House has produced one big change that is distressing GOP leaders, dismaying the tea party's corporate funders and discombobulating the elite bankers at the Federal Reserve. The change is this: Ron Paul.

This 75-year-old ultra-libertarian from Texas has been in Congress for some 35 years, building a consistent record of contrarian views and votes, some of which are quite progressive. He's been a vigorous opponent of U.S. military adventurism around the globe, for example, and an outspoken advocate of pulling all U.S. troops out of both Iraq and Afghanistan. This iconoclast has infuriated many in his own party, who have long dismissed him as an extremist nut.

But now, Paul has gone from an irritating pest to holding real power. He's the new chairman of the subcommittee that oversees the Fed, America's central bank. He views this secretive, autocratic financial agency as a tool of the Wall Street giants, and he's even written a book titled "End the Fed." Last month, prior to assuming his chairmanship, Paul caused an epidemic of apoplexy among Fed officials and big bankers by announcing that he'll be pushing for a full, annual audit of the agency's financial dealings with the global elites.

That seems sensible to me, not nutty. After all, the Federal Reserve is an outfit that furtively funnels trillions of our nation's dollars to private profiteers around the world — yet its transactions are not audited or open to public scrutiny.

Excuse me, but it's the system that's kooky, not Paul, and he's about to shine a bright light into the dark temple of the Fed, exposing an institutional collusion with Wall Street that enriches the few at the expense of the common good.

An unleashed Ron Paul not only scares the bejezus out of the bankers, but also the GOP political establishment, which is thoroughly marinated in Wall Street money. What fun!

To keep up with the twists and turns, and to help Paul stand firm, go to

To find out more about Jim Hightower, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at



6 Comments | Post Comment
I have to disagree - both the system and Rep. Paul are kooky. In some cases, his kooky works for the people. The system never does.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Sean
Wed Jan 12, 2011 4:52 AM
Another anti-capitalist rant by the envious Lowtower pursuing a "classless society". And yet, he reveals how low class he is by the constant use of the perverted "teabag" word. His socialistic dream, based on the Comunist Manifesto, has failed every time it is tried.
Comment: #2
Posted by: David Henricks
Wed Jan 12, 2011 11:17 AM
Then why are you even reading it? Back to your bridge, troll.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Sean
Thu Jan 13, 2011 4:18 AM
Reading David Hencricks's unfounded allegations about Jim Hightower, his un- or misinformed comparing of socialism to Marxism (do you suppose that those socialistic-organization fire departments around the country have red trucks because they're straight out of the Manifesto and that those socialistic-organization police departments changed their flashing lights from red to blue to hide their true nature and that you don't see any little red school houses any more for the same reason?), and his attacking the messenger without any reasonable or reasoned debate regarding the message, I am reminded of what was often said by that great, long-admired, popular every-man's pundit and sage, Bugs Bunny --
"What a maroon."
Comment: #4
Posted by: Joseph Burgess
Fri Jan 14, 2011 9:07 AM
#4 If you had read the communist manifesto, you would have understood how Marx and Engels planned on destroying capitalism, through socialism. Look it up, read it, understand it, before you post your uninformed diatribe.
Comment: #5
Posted by: David Henricks
Fri Jan 14, 2011 11:45 AM
@ David Henricks
"Teabag" bothers you? Are you equally offended when your people call the Democratic party "Democrat"?
Comment: #6
Posted by: Vito Caputo
Sun Jan 16, 2011 5:39 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Jim Hightower
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Jim Hightower
Jim HightowerUpdated 10 Feb 2016
Roger Simon
Roger SimonUpdated 9 Feb 2016
Froma Harrop
Froma HarropUpdated 9 Feb 2016

23 Apr 2008 The Corporate McCain

13 Nov 2012 Billionaires Crap Out in 2012 Elections

29 Jan 2014 Congress Critters can Be Lovable for a Price