creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Jim Hightower
Jim Hightower
8 May 2013
Corporate Cowards Divert Shareholder Funds into “Dark Money”

If corporations are people, as the Supreme Court pretends, they certainly are loudmouths, constantly telling … Read More.

24 Apr 2013
Gagging on Ag-gag Laws

In most state legislatures today, "off the wall" has become the political center, and bizarre bills … Read More.

17 Apr 2013
Saving Our Ravaged Planet ... and Ourselves

Earth Day cometh — the 43rd year of this national focus on the state of our globe. So, how is Earth doing?… Read More.

George W's $250 Million Can of Whitewash

Comment

Big doings in Big D — the George W. Bush Presidential Library is open for business!

What a piece of work it is: a $250 million, 226,000-square-foot edifice on 23 acres in Dallas. His brick-and-limestone structure is certainly imposing, but once inside, you quickly see that it's a $250 million can of whitewash. Of course, all ex-presidents want libraries that show their good side, and Bush himself was organizer-in-chief of this temple to ... well, to himself. What's most striking is not what's in it, but what's not.

For example, where's that "Mission Accomplished" banner that he used as a political prop in May 2003, when he strutted out so fatuously on the deck of the USS Abraham Lincoln wearing a flight suit to pretend like he had won the Iraq war? And how about a video loop of him finally showing up in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina, cluelessly praising his infamously incompetent emergency management honcho with the now notorious shout-out: "Heck of a job, Brownie."

Also, while there are 35 featured videos, a replica of W's oval office, narrated presentations by top Bush officials and even statues of the family dogs — where's Cheney? Shouldn't there be an animated exhibit of the perpetually snarling veep in his dark chamber, scheming to shred our Constitution and set up an imperial presidency (or, more accurately, an imperial vice presidency)?

Another essential element of George's tenure that goes unportrayed could be called "The Dead Garden of Compassionate Conservatism." It could feature such mementos as him cutting health care funding for veterans, closing of the college gates for 1.5 million low-income students and turning a blind eye as 8 million more Americans tumbled down the economic ladder into poverty on his watch.

Then there's a shady exhibit that deserves more exposure. It's the list of $160 million-plus donors to the center, with each name chiseled into bricks that form what should be called "The Brick Wall of Special Interest Government." Among those chiseled-in are AT&T, casino baron Sheldon Adelson, Rupert Murdoch's Fox News empire, several billionaire funders of right-wing politics, the founder of GoDaddy.com, and even the royal rulers of Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates.

The 160 names are by no means all of the corporate and fat cat donors — many more gave, but shyly requested that their involvement be kept from the public. Present law allows such unlimited, secret donations, even while a president is in office, still wielding the power to do favors for donors. Bill Clinton used this undercover loophole, and George W. happily chose the same dark path.

Today (May 1), the doors to Bush's Pharaonic "Presidential Center" open to the public, allowing us commoners to dig deep into the shallowness of his achievements. The enormous building itself sets the tone: sharp edges, high brick walls and the welcoming feel of a fortress. Yet the ex-prez insists that it's a place for public contemplation of his legacy, "a place to lay out facts," he says.

How ironic is that? After all, the Bush-Cheney regime was infamous for its disregard of facts, as well as its hiding, twisting and manufacturing of facts to fool people. From going to war over Iraq's nonexistent weapons of mass destruction to its plan to gut and privatize Social Security — facts were whatever Bush, Cheney, Rummy, Rove and Condi imperiously declared them to be.

More ironic is the centerpiece of the library's attempt to whitewash George's eight awful years: an interactive exhibit called "Decision Points Theater." And theater it is, portraying George heroically as "The Decider." Visitors to this rigged exhibit can use touch screens to see Bush in virtual action, pondering as he receives contradictory advice on whether to save the poor people of New Orleans, bail out Wall Street bankers, rush into Iraq, etc.

The whole show is meant to make you feel sympathy for him, then you're asked to "vote" on whether he did the right thing. Again, irony: We the People got no vote on these issues back when it would've mattered.

There are many, many Bush quotes in this pantheon, but the one that best characterizes him and should be engraved above the entrance to his sparkling new center is this, from August 2002: "I'm the commander. See, I do not need to explain why I say things. That's the interesting thing about being the president. Maybe somebody needs to explain to me why they say something, but I don't feel like I owe anybody an explanation."

To find out more about Jim Hightower, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators webpage at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2013 CREATORS.COM



Comments

10 Comments | Post Comment
True, Bush was a terrible president, but lets not pretend Obama is any better.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Wed May 1, 2013 7:06 AM
Cheny is at an undisclosed location.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Paul M. Petkovsek
Thu May 2, 2013 4:17 AM
Someday, that library will be the home of an expose on one of the most misguided, unjustified, couldn't-have-picked-a-more-effective-way-to-set-human-civilization-back-in-the-world wars ever fought in humanity's history. That war is a world history icon of what civilization should never, ever do again.

And it couldn't have happened without a president who was so under-educated, and over protected, and such a privileged, spoiled brat who never earned an honest penny in his entire life. And before that war that was an excrescence on the face of humanity there was the Supreme Court case that enabled that ugly presidency in the first place.

It was, for millions and millions of innocent people, an utter tragedy. And for world history it was every bit as much of a tragedy. The stars were very misaligned when that sequence of sad events greeted us with W as president. One of the most incompetent, one of the most damaging, ever. Sooner or later, when humanity wakes up, that is what the Bush Library will teach the entire planet.

May that bastard burn in hell for eternity.

And Chris, get your head out of your butt. Obama is flawed for sure, but there is no comparison. For one thing, he got through the Ivy League without his parents paving the way. For another, he has a basic grasp of English grammar. And he's not an alcoholic. From there, the comparisons grow more stark.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Masako
Mon May 6, 2013 7:56 PM
Masako if you don't think Barry Boy got handed things on a silver platter, you'd really better do your research. Start with how he got his teaching job at Harvard. Lets compare then. Bush tortured people. Obama straight up kills them with drones, then drones the rescue workers. Bush added trillions to the national debt. Obama added more. Bush passed the patriot act and stomped civil liberties. Obama campaigned agaisnt Bush's tactics and the patriot act, then doubled down on the same policies once in office. Bush started two wars. Obama promised to get us out of those wars ASAP, and the wars are still going on. If anything Obama is more of a liar. If Bush has a spot reserved in Hell, Obama has one reserved in the circle worse.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Tue May 7, 2013 9:18 AM
Re: Chris McCoy. You really are an idiot. You are living in a fantasy land. Bush started a war on utterly false pretenses that ruined the lives of over 4 million people. Most of what Obama is doing how he inherited.

He himself is practically a drone. I don't like him, but there is just no comparison. You don't do yourself any favors by trying to sweep everything you don't like into one big monolith, and you will never be anything other than a hunt and peck keyboarder who thinks he's hit the big time if you don't use your gray matter a little more effectively.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Masako
Tue May 7, 2013 8:01 PM
Masako this rash series of insults is unbecoming of you and undermines the many civil conversations we've had. I never once defended Bush. I've always thought he was an idiot who abandoned convervatism. It was his actions, not Obamas, that sparked the tea party. But I have my own laundry list of terrible things that Obama has done, and it looks just as bad as yours does agaisnt Bush. Argueing over which of these collosal idiots is worse is like running around in circles and throwing petty insults into the mix is just unneeded.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Wed May 8, 2013 6:07 AM
Re: Chris McCoy. I apologize for calling you an idiot. I truly do.

Maybe I'm the idiot. But I can't brook the comparison between the war criminal Bush and the failed icon Obama. I appreciate your independent thinking about politics, but if you can't get the difference between a war criminal like Bush and a run of the mill nitwit like Obama, that scares me. It truly does. So I start calling names and devaluing responsible commenters like you, just because of the strength of my disagreement.

Bush destroyed an entire country. Can't you grok that? He wasted the entire middle class of Iraq. And he did it on an entirely false premise, which I will never believe for a minute was not deliberately engineered, so he could satisfy his desire to one-up his dad, who was so much greater and more responsible than he. For me as an American, I can't get over that stain on our national conscience.

I don't normally get into comparing sins, but this makes me see Bush as not much better than a Hitler. He didn't obviously hurt his homeland, but in another land, he was an utter monster. He truly was.

Obama is just another sweet-talking non-leader coming along who masquerades as something better. And his family name did not get him there, to be sure. This is what you don't get. He got there by affirmative action and his own, not insubstantial, native smarts.

Bush, in contrast, got there ENTIRELY by his family name. He was an an alcoholic and a shirker who got to escape what he deserved only because of the power of his family. Obama's sins are the sins of inertia he can't overcome, because he is too weak.

Can't you see the difference? It is crucial.

Comment: #7
Posted by: Masako
Wed May 8, 2013 6:10 PM
We are in complete agreement with Bush. He did rise to power solely because of his family name. But if you think Obama is just a "failed icon", well thats where the disagreement comes from. Take the drone strikes for example. Obama has ordered hundreds, if not thousands of them. They have hit Mosques, schools, weddings and other events where civilian casualties are high. He even signed off on double tap drones strikes where a drones makes a second bombing run to kill the rescue workers. Failed icon? No. Obama is a war criminal that can hang with the best of them. If you want to say that Bush is the bigger war criminal because he started the wars, then ok, fair enough. But in my mind you certainly can compare the two in the war crime arena.
Comment: #8
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Thu May 9, 2013 6:18 AM
Re: Chris McCoy. Have you ever served in a war? I don't think so. You kill, kill, kill. You are terrified and that is just what you do, and you spend your life afterwards feeling guilty for it.

By your calculus, Roosevelt surely is a war criminal too. His WW2 machine utterly destroyed three major cities--the men, women, and children equally, with zero discrimination between military and civilian targets.

There is not much more we can do to draw a distinction between what we call terrorism and what we call "legitimate" war than to focus on whether the initial intent is to avoid non-military targets as much as is reasonably practicable, given the fact that the basic tool of war is killing and destruction.

There is of course, the third category, which is the war that is fought not to terrorize, but for an illegitimate purpose just the same. WW II for me was clearly a war fought against the Axis for a legitimate purpose, and frankly, that is how I can find a way in my soul to forgive Dresden, Nagasaki, and Hiroshima.

By the same calculus however, I hope GW Bush burns in hell forever. His purpose was self-serving and utterly indifferent to the price in human suffering his war was exacting for what was pretty much a personal interest in one-upping his dad and showing Hussein who was boss.

I kind of put those who pushed us into Viet Nam in a similar category, not because of their misguided purpose and initial stupidity in getting us into it, but for failing to apologize and admit their mistake once the dust cleared and we got to see what that conflict was really about. That failure is pretty much of the same type as the even current-day failure of the Japanese government to apologize to China for the carnage it caused in Manchuria.

So as far as Obama goes, I don't see a huge distinction between drones and guided missiles. The drones act with more direct control in real time, but the issue is the intent and the result, just as it is with all weapons usage.

Maybe we are desperately fighting in Afghanistan because our leaders fear the fall of Pakistan and groups like Al Qaeda and the Taliban getting their hands on its nukes. Did you ever consider that? How would you like that to happen?

I don't know, but understanding that the stakes are very high, I don't have enough data to Obama in any category other than who the hell knows what he is doing, but did not start any war and he may have a legitimate purpose in continuing the war he inherited. The drones for me are a non-issue, except for their increasing fallout in the political arena.
Comment: #9
Posted by: Masako
Fri May 10, 2013 5:48 PM
Roosevelt could be considered a war criminal. But there is one huge distinction there. He actually declared war. Its something modern politicians have found a loophole for. To say that Bush should rot in hell for starting the wars, but that Obama may have a legit reason for continuing those same wars is beyond illogical. If the wars were a bad idea to begin with, then they don't suddenly become worthwhile when a new president takes over. I'm almost as mad at Obama for continuing the wars as much as I am at Bush for starting them. You may feel differently, and thats ok. But horrendious foreign policy is not the only reason to be mad. I'm mad at Bush for starting the the oppresive DHS. Also for putting us in debt, creating the TSA, and (un)patriot act. But now Obama is talking about turning the DHS into his own private security force. Its scary stuff. Oh, and I have not been to war, but I did serve in the military. Not the same, I know, but its more than 99% of the population.
Comment: #10
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Mon May 13, 2013 6:36 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Jim Hightower
May. `13
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Susan EstrichUpdated 15 May 2013
Roger Simon
Roger SimonUpdated 15 May 2013
Robert Scheer
Robert ScheerUpdated 14 May 2013

8 Jun 2011 Sneaking the Plutocratic Agenda Into State Law

5 Dec 2012 The Airline Industry's Fee-for-all

25 Jun 2008 Rewriting Some Patriot Act Stupidity