Poll after poll shows that the American people want higher taxes. That's not the same as liking higher taxes. The people have simply concluded that higher taxes are preferable to the alternative — so vividly portrayed in the Republican plan to do away with government guarantees in Medicare.
And Republicans don't even have that ugly option to offer anymore. After voters in western New York rioted over it by handing a formerly safe GOP congressional seat to a Democrat, many Republicans have been jumping ship. Odd that House Speaker John Boehner continues to sail on with nothing in the hold but a vague threat to let America default on its debt if ... if what? If Democrats refuse to make the drastic spending cuts Republicans are afraid to push.
What do the American people think? A Quinnipiac poll found that 69 percent, including nearly half of Republicans, want taxes raised on households making more than $250,000. A later Ipsos/Reuters polls shows three-fifths wanting to raise taxes to cut the deficit.
When President Obama recently urged Republicans to accept some tax increases as part of a deficit-cutting deal, the ship stayed dead in the water. "The American people know tax hikes destroy jobs," Boehner stated.
Is that so? Perhaps the people remember that in 1993 President Clinton signed a tax increase that helped set off an economic boom and job bonanza. Why? America had shown a willingness to start paying its bills, and investors responded with enthusiasm. In this case, higher taxes created jobs.
Clinton left a budget surplus that his successor, George W. Bush, quickly squandered with tax cuts. Even then, polls showed public support for them only on the understanding that the surpluses would continue. They famously did not.
Today, high-tax Sweden has only 7 percent unemployment, while ours is 9 percent.
How come? Before the 2008 economic meltdown, Sweden prudently maintained a budget surplus equal to 3.6 percent of its economy. Bush's America was running a 3 percent deficit.
So guess which country was better prepared to weather the deep recession that followed? In the recent first quarter, Sweden's economy expanded at an annual rate of 6.4 percent, while ours grew a mere 1.9 percent. Meanwhile, no one in Sweden is threatening the health care security of anyone, much less the elderly.
Offering no serious deficit plan that the public can stomach, what Republicans have left is a political plan. Here's how it goes:
After the 1993 tax hike, Democrats suffered grievously at the polls. Though other factors were involved, Republicans pounded them on the tax increase, despite its affecting only high-income households. At the same time, they hearkened back to Ronald Reagan's famous tax cuts, even though the Gipper had also raised taxes 11 times, and still, the national debt doubled during his two terms.
Republicans also recall the beating President George H.W. Bush took from the party's anti-tax cultists after he broke his pledge, "Read my lips, no new taxes." That raising taxes was the responsible thing to do back then did the elder Bush little good.
Many voters who bought the voodoo that tax cuts automatically pay for themselves, and more, are older now, and some are wiser. America must curb spending for sure, but clearly no tolerable path away from the deficit cliff can skirt the revenue side — especially when federal tax collections (relative to the gross domestic product) are the lowest they've been in 60 years.
The Good Ship Tax Cut has run its last cruise. The hard fiscal realities are getting harder to ignore, prompting even recovering tax-a-phobes to take a sedative and say, "Yes, new taxes."
To find out more about Froma Harrop, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2011 THE PROVIDENCE JOURNAL CO.
DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM

|
 |
Comments
|
12 Comments | Post Comment
|
|
A recent poll said 47% want higher taxes amazingly that is the same number that pay no federal taxes, what a surprise that people always think it is ok to raise taxes on other people.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Bill Stephens
Tue Jul 5, 2011 12:45 AM
|
|
|
|
"After voters in western New York rioted over it by handing a formerly safe GOP congressional seat to a Democrat, many Republicans have been jumping ship."
Ms. Harrop finds significance in this point but very little in the crushing defeat of dems in the mid-term election. Spinning like a top. Perhaps her "elitist" pride won't accept reality. I think she is wrong in suggesting that people want to raise taxes. People are still upset that the political "elites" allowed one quarter of private savings to be stolen by "elite" corporate chiefs. Then the political "elites" QE'd tax money back to the corporate "elites" who then purchased big bonuses for themselves. Meanwhile everybody who pays for it all is doing with a little less, "shared sacrifice" our President calls it. Fine, we are earning and spending less. Shouldn't the government participate in this "shared sacrifice'" by earning less and spending less? Harrop's vaunted "elites" put us in this corner, that tells you all that is needed to know about the current crop of "elites"; they are incompetent. Why should "shared sacrifice" apply only to taxpayers?
Comment: #2
Posted by: Tom
Tue Jul 5, 2011 6:02 AM
|
|
|
|
We were warned a long time ago that once more people were receiving Government handouts than were producing and contributing, we were doomed. Well folks welcome to the future! Of course some people want more taxes. They ain't payin' them and without them, their freebies end! What a moronic commentary. Well, maybe not! After all Fromma is a certified liberal!
Comment: #3
Posted by: YankeeI
Tue Jul 5, 2011 7:27 AM
|
|
|
|
The people want a new President.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Tom
Tue Jul 5, 2011 8:58 AM
|
|
|
|
How about this, Froma: Everyone who wants higher taxes start paying them. Nothing says people can't give the IRS more than they demand.
Oh? That's not what you meant? You meant that "the people" want <i>everyone else</i> to pay higher taxes? Is that it?
Comment: #5
Posted by: Henry Miller
Tue Jul 5, 2011 2:55 PM
|
|
|
|
Last time we checked, 80% of the American public want the
ILLEGAL and UNCONSTITUTIONAL, debt-serving, FAKE currency issuing,
Globalist-RED China sellout and TREASON enabling 'Federal' Reserve
abolished and its minnions richly, deeply, warmly PROSECUTED.
DO try to find a clue. Check out ALAN WATT online. Essential coverage as it comes down.
Comment: #6
Posted by: free bee
Tue Jul 5, 2011 8:51 PM
|
|
|
|
1) The only party with a plan starts with an "R".
2) The ObamaCare plan will reduce Medicare funding, funny how that never gets mentioned by the left.
3) The Clinton surplus is a myth, having used borrowed funds to create illusion of suprplus.
4) Clinton brought us the tech bubble and the era of Enron type excess.
5) Comparing us to Sweden is insane, but a quick ckeck of recent history shows that they have been rolling back some of their previous social welfare programs and beginning deregulation. Does this show that a conservative message might have worked to weather the economic downturn?
Comment: #7
Posted by: Tired of the spin
Wed Jul 6, 2011 4:25 AM
|
|
|
|
This broad is using typical democrat math, that is the opposite of what real math is. Small numbers are the larger and larger numbers are smaller.
Comment: #8
Posted by: Richard Reames
Wed Jul 6, 2011 7:50 PM
|
|
|
|
Polls say people want other people taxed higher; no one is saying tax me higher, including our millionaire President. Obama should take the lead and give back to the government that portion of his income he feels he has unfairly been allowed to keep from the Bush/Obama tax cuts. Did Obama extend them for his own benefit? If not, Obama should lead the way and pay his "fair share" as an example for the rest of us. Michael Moore, do the same.
I will bet Ms. Harrop does not know how a small business Sub-S corp is taxed. Otherwise she would not be for an across the board tax increase. It is not as simple as just raising rates on the "rich", however you define "rich." But as was said in the Orwell book "1984", "Ignorance is Power". Ms. Harrop and columnists like her clearly believe that; none do the research necessary to form an informed view; it is much easier to use the talking points.
If you took everything away from the billionaires in this country, you could not cover the deficit from Obama's last year. All tax increases have ever done is give politicians the illusion they could raise spending. Froma, you might benefit from reading Thomas Sowell's column from 7/7/11 where he talks about talking points. But be careful, you might actually learn something.
Everyone says raise taxes but no one is willing to say what level of Federal taxation is the "right" level, given you also have state income taxes, some places have local income taxes, real estate taxes, sales taxes, etc... For Obama, I will offer a "right" level for him. Since we are going to be paying him a $250,000 or more pension, I think everything he gets from his book proceeds should go to the government. That would be his "fair" share.
Comment: #9
Posted by: Terry K
Thu Jul 7, 2011 11:23 AM
|
|
|
|
IF Clinton had a surplus, tell me which year under Clinton the National Debt went down. Now if you say the surplus was predicted to happen in the future, the future did not predict 9/11. I predicted I would have $80,000 income this year, up until being downsized at the end of last year....now I will be lucky to get a third of that this year and 75% of that in coming years. On the plus side, my income taxes will be considerably reduced, but not my real estate taxes...if the government forecasted me as paying the same as last year, it will be sadly mistaken. $7,000 in taxes last year, -0- this year, and 2 million other people who had a job at the beginning of the Obama Presidency and do not now. Obama created 4 million jobs, but they are all overseas.
Government forecasts are useless - look at all the mass transit systems built for thousands of forecasted riders that never materialized...one project in Nevada being in default right now as the predicted ridership is less than half of forecast. A 10-year forecast is simply fiction - the expenses are always forecast too low and the tax revenue too high. Raise taxes too high, and it is very easy to find legal ways to lower your taxable income. Increasing tax rates will simply result in lower tax revenue to the government.
Comment: #10
Posted by: Terry K
Thu Jul 7, 2011 11:43 AM
|
|
|
|
Please, Please, Please, Mr. Obama, follow the wisdom of this article and center your next campaign on raising taxes and make sure EVERYONE knows you intend on raising taxes. Please, Please . . . . every Democrat do this.
LOL
Comment: #11
Posted by: SusansMirror
Thu Jul 7, 2011 12:21 PM
|
|
|
|
Re: Tom
Tom, please, when you see a moron democrat/liberial running toward a cliff, push them, don't trip them for their own good.
Comment: #12
Posted by: SusansMirror
Thu Jul 7, 2011 12:24 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|