opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Froma Harrop
Froma Harrop
11 Feb 2016
Some Sage Advice for Hillary Clinton

I come not to rebuke Hillary Clinton, who remains by far the most capable presidential candidate. I come … Read More.

9 Feb 2016
Our Love-Hate Relationship With Valentine's Day

Valentine's Day is upon us. And to think we are still recuperating from Groundhog Day. That's February for you,… Read More.

4 Feb 2016
And the Oscar for Most Stunning Actress Goes to ...

We are here not to discuss the complex #OscarsSoWhite controversy but to address another sore point with … Read More.

The Good, the Bad and the Ugly of Health Reform


It's high noon on health care reform. Time to identify the Good, the Bad and the Ugly.

Let's start with the Bad: Obama's passive leadership. The president didn't want to come down from the mount with stone tablets detailing what reform would look like. That's what Hillary Clinton did 16 years ago and is said to have sunk her plan. The alpha-dog approach angered both the economic interests and lawmakers.

But Obama still could have offered more detailed guidelines that chose which interests to disappoint and that the public could understand. Legislators would have then had something to work with.

The president's hesitancy only empowered the lobbyists. Not knowing what Obama would fight for, lawmakers turned more pliant toward the moneyed interests. So when Obama finally came down from the mountain for orderly legislation, he instead found this wild dance around the golden calf.

"We're going to have to wade in a little deeper into the nitty-gritty to keep the process going," White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel said Tuesday. About time.

The Ugly: The Ugly is not necessarily good or bad. It just doesn't look nice. The Ugly must be either repackaged or removed.

As policy, taxing fancy health plans makes sense. It raises money for reform and discourages wasteful health care spending. But the idea of taxing gold-plated worker benefits comes off as ugly to the non-wonk public. And it doesn't sit well with the unions that won generous coverage. Obama could go to the mat on this, but he would have to do much explaining.

Also Ugly is the proposed surtax on the rich. Again, having the wealthy pay more is not a terrible idea, but they shouldn't be paying for everything. Obama's campaign line about doing away with the Bush tax cuts for the rich — while shielding families earning less than $250,000 from any tax increases ever — was always irritating.

It is free-lunch politics.

The Bush income-tax cuts were sharply skewed toward the rich, so letting them all expire would still raise more revenues from those most able to pay. But placing a surtax on top of that is ugly. The word "surtax" is ugly. Put in place a simple, progressive tax system, and leave it at that.

The Good. The Obama administration and Congress plan to pay for health care reform. That might sound like an obvious duty of lawmaking, but such responsibilities were cast off during the past eight years.

Republicans passed the Medicare drug benefit in 2003 seemingly without a single thought of paying for it. It was all done with borrowed money. Because no one had to raise taxes, few cared how much the benefit would cost. Thus, Congress could give away the store to insurers and drugmakers while handing a new goody to seniors.

Now we have lawmakers brawling over reform's price tag, payments to providers and whose income will be tapped. It's not pretty, but it is good. The rumble means that whatever health reform emerges should be fiscally sound.

Some liberals are foolishly bashing the moderate Blue Dog Democrats for demanding that more of reform's cost be covered by better-controlled spending. The American health care system is notoriously wasteful. And the Congressional Budget Office report that none of the health care bills would notably slow spending underscores what they're lacking: cost containment.

If no one cared about paying for this thing, everyone would be holding hands and singing these bills' praises — and future taxpayers would be left with another outrageous bag of debt. Good Dogs.

The fights may be ugly — and over some bad ideas — but they are happening for a good, good reason.

To find out more about Froma Harrop, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at




1 Comments | Post Comment
07-26-09 Lately I have heard over and over the ususal complaint the nthe U.S. health care industry needs an overhaul. Everyone seems to want something for nothing. We abuse our bodies with tobacco, alcohol, high calories "food", live the good life and get overweight, complaine and keep eating. We want the government to pay for our overindulging by making health care free. Has anyone told the current generation that they are responsible for their actions? There is a current health related activity taking place today in several cities around the U.S. A health related activity that is benign, cures illnesses and costs not one cent. This is not a come on sales pitch designed to get money out your pocket, but an honest to goodness true healing process. In order to understand what I have said, we have to to to China in 1992 when Li Hongzhi came to the public with his Falun Gong practice. A practice of wholistic body purification that occurs while one is practicing. He has writeen a book called Zhuan Falun translated to English (Turning the Law Wheel), created five nonstrenuous exercises that when done correctly, purify the body on its way to complete perfect health. The cost? Not one cent. Me Hongzhi came to the public to save human beings and to help us improve our moral lives. Is there anything wrong with that? I think the world needs to know more about this form of free wholistic healing. Could you please check on it yourself by researching the several websites about Falun Gong:;; Then you can decide for yourself if Falun Gong is what the health of our nation and our earth needs. If you have any question or opinion, you can contact me at the above address. Thank you for your atttention. Tom Brough

Comment: #1
Posted by: Thomas Brough
Sun Jul 26, 2009 5:19 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Froma Harrop
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 12 Feb 2016
Connie Schultz icon
Connie SchultzUpdated 11 Feb 2016
Joe Conason
Joe ConasonUpdated 11 Feb 2016

24 Jun 2008 The Real Beef in Korean Trade Talks

25 Feb 2014 Mass Transit Is for the Young

10 Sep 2013 Oldster Passions, Hipster Fans, Long Lives