creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Froma Harrop
Froma Harrop
24 May 2012
Bain And Our Screwed-Up Culture

We recently saluted Leslie Sabo for giving his life to save fellow soldiers in Vietnam 40 years ago. Injured … Read More.

22 May 2012
The United States of Gambling

A surprising fact: Gamblers spent more last year at commercial casinos in Indiana than they did at non-Indian … Read More.

17 May 2012
Grief Is Not a Mental Illness

We moderns seem determined to suppress all unhappiness with one exception: grief. The intense sadness … Read More.

McCain Has Given Enough

Share Comment

"Dear Greg, I've been dating a guy since I was 23. I'm 28 now. We started talking about marriage two years ago, and he said he wasn't 'ready.' So we moved in together to help him get 'ready.' ... Does he need more time, or is he just not that into marrying me?"

The above comes from the self-help book (now a movie) "He's Just Not That Into You." Co-author Greg Behrendt replies:

"Dear Waiting at the Altar, He's right. Why rush? It's only been five years. He's going to know you so much better after 10. ... Yep, my lovely, I know it's hard to hear, but better to hear it now than 10 years from now." In sum, he's just not that into you.

Would someone please send this book to John McCain?

Ever since the religious right slimed him and his family in the 2000 South Carolina Republican primary — thus reviving the candidacy of George W. Bush, whom McCain had just clobbered in New Hampshire — McCain has been courting the very people he then called "agents of intolerance."

But years of carrying armloads of flowers to religious conservatives have engendered little reciprocation. Listen to the cold response of Lori Viars, an evangelical activist, when asked whether she and her colleagues would work for McCain as they had for Bush:

"I think a lot of us are in a holding pattern."

McCain has sacrificed so much of his moderate image for them, and this is the thanks he gets. Nothing new here. For all his efforts to appease social conservatives, McCain scored dead last out of nine Republicans in the October Values Voter Straw Poll — right behind pro-choice Rudy Giuliani!

The sad thing about McCain is that he was never into the very people who are not into him, while doing very little for those who might be.

New polls show independents evenly split between Barack Obama and McCain, despite their dismal views of the Republican Party.

For starters, McCain should temper his official anti-choice position with a Giuliani-esque declaration that while personally opposed to abortion, he would not want it outlawed. McCain himself said that in 2000.

I happen to believe that as president, McCain would not seek the repeal of Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court decision guaranteeing a right to abortion (and if he did, Democrats would stop him). But saying that he wouldn't do what he says he will do in his campaign literature is not the most convincing of arguments. The smarter Obama campaign, meanwhile, has the candidate out proclaiming his religiosity before moderate evangelicals — and without altering his liberal views.

(Note from the Department of Short Memories: One recalls the purple apoplexy when Republican Mike Huckabee ran a Christmastide TV ad that the left insisted featured a cross, which the ad maker said was just the lines of a bookshelf. "Hypocrite Huckabee Leaves His Cross in Iowa," read a headline in The Nation. Five months later, an Obama flyer in Kentucky shows the "committed Christian" at a pulpit before a giant cross — no ambiguity here — and there's nary a squeak from stage left.)

McCain has taken baby steps toward winning moderates who would vote for him if only he'd give them something. For instance, he recently reminded Clinton backers that he had voted to confirm two of the Supreme Court's leading liberals, Stephen Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

But it's time for bolder action from McCain. He should tell religious conservatives, "I've given you what I've got, and it's more than you'll get from the other guy," and then sprint to the center, where so many would appreciate a phone call.

To find out more about Froma Harrop, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 THE PROVIDENCE JOURNAL CO.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
There seems to be a pattern to Froma Harrop's columns during the presidential primary season and now the General Election campaign season. Ms. Harrop cleary felt that Obama had no business running for the presidency when this was supposed to be the year for Hillary Clinton to get the Democratic Nomination.
A review of her columns consistently reflected on her preference for mandatory universal health care, Clinton's plan, versus affordable healthcare with mandatory health care for children, Obama's plan. This was a fair distinction to be considered by primary voters. A further review showed an emphasis on electability and how the candidate's stacked up against John McCain. Harropp seached far and wide to find inconsistencies in Obama's record, yet she ignored the many inconsistencies of the Hillary Clinton, even when they happened so obviously in the span of two minutes during the debates in Philadelphia last October, (The dreaded DL's for undocumented workers).
Further, Harrop blames sexism for Clinton's failure to beat Obama. Sexism did play a part in media coverage, but white men supported Clinton thoughout the campaign season and it was not a significant reason for the results. Harrop failed to acknowlege Clinton's consistently high "negatives"that Christopher Dodd referenced in the Philadelphia debate last October ("half of the nation won't vote for her in the general election"). Carl Rove on Fox television was very excited about the prospect of Clinton winning the nomination with those "high negatives". Her nomination might have been a force that would have energized the right, which Rove used to elect Bush to 2 terms, unfortunately. Alot of the "negatives" have to with Clinton's willingness to say anything and do anything to win elections over the years including the practice of "polling" that her husband used to make decisions to run the country when he was in the Whitehouse. Obama has campaigned effectively against this opproach ("no more polling to determine policy" is what he said in Iowa) and it is part of the reason for his popularity.
Yes, there was sexism involved in the coverage of this campaign, but it doesn't explain the ultimate results because Clinton did well in the male vote. The real reason she lost was that she didn't run a smart campaign and her negatives were just too high. She ran on experience and inevitability when the country wanted change. She tried to change her message and use her husband and the combination was just ineffective.
Now I sadly have to question Froma Harrop's motives in her columns. She has consistently made the case for John McCain against Obama, claiming Hillary's support is going to go McCain's way. (Recent polling numbers do not show this trend). She has used tortured logic to claim that McCain is actually "pro choice" when he is clearly "pro life" during this campaign. Harrop is either hoping for a McCain victory so she can join the "I told you so" crowd, or she is secretly hoping that McCain can win so Senator Clinton will have another shot at the Whitehouse in four years.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Dan McGinn
Fri Jun 20, 2008 8:25 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Froma Harrop
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Tom Rosshirt
Tom RosshirtUpdated 26 May 2012
David Sirota
David SirotaUpdated 25 May 2012

5 Jun 2007 Choosing Sides on Immigration

27 Oct 2011 The Dietary Supplement Scam Continues

25 Mar 2008 Bailouts -- Be Very Particular