creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Froma Harrop
Froma Harrop
2 Sep 2014
The 'Spiral of Silence'

With folks yapping all day on social media — Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and the rest — how … Read More.

28 Aug 2014
The Smallness of Being in Economy Class

Americans are in the dumps about their future. What does that have to do with legroom in economy class? Everything. … Read More.

26 Aug 2014
What About That VA Hospital Scandal?

The unofficial end of summer, Labor Day, may serve as a bookend to a scandal that exploded around the … Read More.

Expensive Care That Hurts Patients

Comment

The biggest challenge for fixing American health care isn't finding more money. It's learning not to spend money on the wrong things. The solution, conservatives say, is simple: Have patients bear more of the costs now being covered by private or government insurers. The concept has merit, except for this: How on earth can we mortals know we don't need something when the god wearing the stethoscope says we do?

Guidelines are needed, and this is a job for government working with medical experts. To advance the process, here are examples of some low-hanging fruit of waste, ripped from the news:

— Obesity surgery for teenagers. The New York Times reported on a 17-year-old — 5 feet tall and 271 pounds — who could have lost her excess weight through diet and exercise but didn't try very hard. So a New York state program for low-income people paid $21,369 for an operation whereby a surgeon placed a silicon band around her stomach to curb feelings of hunger.

After losing only 34 pounds, the girl began again downing chips and chocolate with abandon. She was almost back to where she started.

Psychological factors often underlie serious weight problems. Until obese young people — who have time on their side — deal with the emotional part, subjecting them to surgery is cruel and a crying waste of money.

— MRIs for athletes with minor pains. MRIs can detect tumors and help doctors confirm their suspicions. But they also find "problems" that, while best ignored, nonetheless provide a pretext for expensive medical intervention.

As an experiment, Dr. James Andrews, a sports medicine orthopedist in Gulf Breeze, Fla., did MRI scans on 31 fit and happy professional baseball pitchers. He found abnormal shoulder cartilage in 90 percent of the athletes. Based on the scans, he could have operated on nine out of 10 of them — totally unnecessarily.

Insurers pay over $1,000 for an MRI scan.

The operation to fix the insignificant problems highlighted costs a lot more.

— Regular bone density tests for all women over 65. By the time women hit age 65, bone loss leading to osteoporosis progresses very slowly. If their bone density is found to be normal for their age, they don't need bone density tests every two years, which Medicare covers, according to The New England Journal of Medicine.

And when all this testing finds only mildly lower bone densities, the women are often overprescribed bisphosphonates, such as Fosamax. Bisphosphonates can cause rare but gruesome side effects. They make far more sense for older women with osteoporosis.

— Stents for patients with stable heart pain. Patients showing symptoms of a heart attack often undergo angioplasty, involving the insertion of a metal tube called a stent. But about one in eight angioplasties are done on patients with stable angina who are showing only minor chest pain, according to an article in The Journal of the American Medical Association.

For these patients, another study showed, stents didn't do any more good than oral medications — and the operations themselves pose some risk. One doctor in Maryland reportedly extracted $3.8 million from Medicare for implanting nearly 600 medically unnecessary stents.

I almost forgot to mention double CT scans, whereby hospitals administer two computerized tomography scans to a patient in the course of a single day. CT scans are both expensive and expose patients to high levels of radiation. Medicare pays whatever. A hospital in Tulsa, Okla., was found to have double-scanned 80 percent of its Medicare chest patients in 2008.

Note that the above examples involved not only wasted money but subjected patients to potentially harmful "treatments." Want to curb medical spending? We've hardly scratched the surface.

To find out more about Froma Harrop, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2012 THE PROVIDENCE JOURNAL CO.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM



Comments

5 Comments | Post Comment
Wow, I actually agree with this article. Common sense can go a long way to reducing medical costs. When you use your head, you'll see that there are better ways to fix healthcare than 2 trillion dollar reform bills.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Tue Mar 20, 2012 6:59 AM
What about the billions of dollars spent on meds that have overhyped "benefits" and underestimated side effects?
The glaring is example is statin drugs, which have shown no mortailty benefits in women, and the hyped "33% reduction in risk of heart attack you find in Lipitor ads is really the difference between 2% and 3%--and even that is offset by other factors probably related to the meds.
There is increasing evidence that the tendency to put patients on lifetime doses of meds (often with serious side effects) rather than finding lifestyle mods or even "benign neglect" is benefiting drug companies at our expense.
Comment: #2
Posted by: partsmom
Tue Mar 20, 2012 11:01 AM
While I agree with some of what Froma has written, her premise is wrong. "Guidelines are needed, and this is a job for government working with medical experts." Government is, precisly, part of the problem, to begin with. First, it is not government's job according to The Constitution. Lawyers, aided by un-elected bureaucrats, combined with greed has brought the health insurance business to the brink. Get government out is the first step.
Comment: #3
Posted by: David Henricks
Tue Mar 20, 2012 11:07 AM
Good point Partsmom. Drug companies are definetly out to get you too. You have to be very careful before starting a new drug and make sure the benifets outweight the risks. Common sense can do a lot to turn the tide of healthcare costs.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Tue Mar 20, 2012 11:07 AM
David, good catch. I didn't even see that. You're right. Government intervention has caused this problem. I should have known better that a liberal shill like froma would say something like that.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:52 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Froma Harrop
Sep. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roger Simon
Roger SimonUpdated 3 Sep 2014
Susan EstrichUpdated 3 Sep 2014
Froma Harrop
Froma HarropUpdated 2 Sep 2014

21 Jul 2011 Confessions of a Recovering Light Bulb Hoarder

15 Jul 2008 Mortgage Scandal a Bipartisan Affair

29 Apr 2014 Mail Today, Gone Tomorrow