creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
David Sirota
David Sirota
25 May 2012
A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Headlines transmit information in its rawest form — and the best of headlines crystallize indelible truths.… Read More.

18 May 2012
Yes, We Can Walk and Chew Gum

One of the most overused metaphors in a writer's arsenal is the one about "walking and chewing gum at … Read More.

11 May 2012
Our Guns and Butter Economy

With the economy still struggling and the debates over how to fix the problem more intense than ever, one … Read More.

What the Pot Legalization Campaign Really Threatens

Share Comment

Here's a fact that even drug policy reform advocates can acknowledge: California's 2010 ballot initiative to legalize marijuana does, indeed, pose a real threat, as conservative culture warriors insist. But not to public health, as those conservatives claim.

According to most physicians, pot is less toxic — and has more medicinal applications — than a legal and more pervasive drug like alcohol. Whereas alcohol causes hundreds of annual overdose deaths, contributes to untold numbers of illnesses and is a major factor in violent crime, the use of marijuana has never resulted in a fatal overdose and has not been systemically linked to major illness or violent behavior.

So this ballot measure is no public health threat. If anything, it would give the millions of citizens who want to use inebriating substances a safer alternative to alcohol. Which, of course, gets to what this ballot initiative really endangers: alcohol industry profits.

That truth is underscored by news this week that the California Beer and Beverage Distributors is financing the campaign against the legalization initiative. This is the same group that bankrolled opposition to a 2008 ballot measure, which would have reduced penalties for marijuana possession.

By these actions, alcohol companies are admitting that more sensible drug policies could cut into their government-created monopoly on mind-altering substances. Thus, they are fighting back — and not just defensively. Unsatisfied with protecting turf in California, the alcohol industry is going on offense, as evidenced by a recent article inadvertently highlighting America's inane double standards.

Apparently oblivious to the issues the California campaign is now raising, Businessweek just published an elated puff piece headlined "Keeping Pabst Blue Ribbon Cool." Touting the beer's loyal following, the magazine quoted one PBR executive effusively praising a rate of alcohol consumption that would pickle the average liver.

"A lot of blue-collar workers I've talked to say 'I've been drinking a six-pack of Pabst, every single day, seven days a week, for 25 years,'" he gushed, while another executive added "It's, like, habitual — it's part of their life.

It's their lifestyle."

Discussing possible plans to "develop a whole beer brand around troops" — one that devotes some proceeds to military organizations — the executives said their vision is "that when you see Red White & Blue (beer) at your barbecue, you know that money's supporting people who have died for our country."

Imagine marijuana substituted for alcohol in this story. The article would be presented as a scary expose about workers smoking a daily dime-bag and marijuana growers' linking pot with the Army. Undoubtedly, such an article would be on the front page of every newspaper as cause for outrage. Yet, because this was about alcohol — remember, a substance more toxic than marijuana — it was buried in a financial magazine and depicted as something to extol.

Couple that absurd hypocrisy with the vociferous opposition to California's initiative, and we see the meta-message.

We are asked to believe that people drinking a daily six-pack for a quarter-century is not a lamentable sign of a health crisis, but instead a "lifestyle" triumph worthy of flag-colored celebration — and we are expected to think that legalizing a safer alternative to this "lifestyle" is dangerous. Likewise, as laws obstruct veterans from obtaining doctor-prescribed marijuana for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, we are asked to believe that shotgunning cans of lager is the real way to "support our troops."

These are the delusions that a liquor-drenched culture prevents us from reconsidering. In a society drunk off of alcohol propaganda — a society of presidential "beer summits" and sports stadiums named after beer companies — we've had trouble separating fact from fiction. Should California pass its ballot initiative, perhaps a more sober and productive drug policy might finally become a reality.

David Sirota is the author of the best-selling books "Hostile Takeover" and "The Uprising." He hosts the morning show on AM760 in Colorado and blogs at OpenLeft.com. E-mail him at ds@davidsirota.com or follow him on Twitter @davidsirota.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

9 Comments | Post Comment
Maybe this guy should go back to college and see how many kids stop smoking pot the second they turn 21. Marijuna has always been very easy to buy, but its for teens and losers.
Comment: #1
Posted by: zach
Thu Sep 23, 2010 9:36 PM
Great article. Also, don't forget the overcrowding of prisons and waste of tax dollars to keep up these victimless "criminals". Free Cannabis!
Comment: #2
Posted by: Amanda
Thu Sep 23, 2010 10:00 PM
I've never smoked pot but, I don't see what the big deal about it is. I'm more uncomfortable around drunks than pot heads...they just laugh and eat a lot. Like my cop buddy says, "I've never had to respond to a domestic disturbance where pot was the issue." Legalize it and tax it....end of budget deficits.
Comment: #3
Posted by: craig
Fri Sep 24, 2010 10:08 AM
Although I'm not a pot smoker myself, I live in the Netherlands where the stuff is sold over the counter to persons over the age of 18. There are no real problems with this and it controls the issue so that kids - kids over 18 - do not come into contact with hard drugs. Hard drugs are very strictly prohibited and anyone caught with them is severly prosecuted. In the US and most other countries, the same dealer that sells your kid weed also sells coke, ecstasy, speed, whatever. Is this smart? Pot seems relatively harmless and poses no real threat to anyone's health. Of course, there are always, ALWAYS people that overuse anything (food, money, work, exercise, etc).
Concerning alcohol sales, I have to say I do not see any effect on the amount of alcohol sold here. Alcohol causes most of the problems here as elsewhere; problems related to voilence mainly. Most people stop smoking pot, etc. when they are around 21 - 25 years old here and start to focus on their career or family - like everywhere else in the world! I do not understand how the US can afford all this useless unecessary moralism. Good luck with that.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Bill
Mon Sep 27, 2010 1:27 AM
Zach, are YOU high? You are not thinking too clearly. To the extent that great numbers of people DO quit smoking pot once they turn 21, it's because it IS illegal. Why keep using something that can cost you a job by failing a urine test, or even get you sent to jail, when there is another inebriant that you can just go into a bar and use legally? Also, as Bill notes, many people cut back on all inebriation in their early 20s as they get serious about their careers.
Comment: #5
Posted by: cassandr
Mon Sep 27, 2010 2:27 AM
How ridiculous to say that because alcohol is legal, so should marijuana be legal. Let me post this counter argument that I'm sure these same liberal's will just love:

(Mostly) non-lethal Tazers are currently illegal for average citizens to own. Handguns and Rifles, which kill many people, are legal to own. Therefore, shouldn't we see articles about how Tazers should be legal to own since guns are already legal to own?

NO. Instead, we see articles about how guns are dangerous, and hear speeches from our own president about how gun owners are backwards. However, because most liberals seem quite comfortable with pot and alcohol (and admit to using these substances themselves), we get articles that go against common sense. Alcohol is bad, marijuana slightly less bad in, so legalize marijuana. Guns are bad, Tazers less bad, so make guns illegal.

Trust me, I'd rather see alcohol go, but that's just not going to happen again (remember, prohibition was a constitutional amendment, but so was the repeal). Gun ownership is already protected under the constitution, but liberals still fight to get that changed. Marijuana, an acknowledged mind altering substance causing millions of adults and adolescents to under-perform, quit jobs, drop out of school, is not protected under any law, illegal under many laws, yet is advocated for constantly.

Gotta love our "regulate that which doesn't affect ME, but keep your damn government hands off my Guns/Ganja!" philosophy overrunning both parties of our government.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Nathan H.
Mon Sep 27, 2010 8:58 AM
Legalize it tax it release the prisoners and save billions in corrections and enforcement and create a new tax income base.
Comment: #7
Posted by:
Wed Sep 29, 2010 3:01 PM

I'm a 79 yr. old woman. In my long life I've seen MANY families ruined by alcohol consumption. I've never seen one ruined by pot.
Comment: #8
Posted by: mary ellen sullivan
Sun Oct 3, 2010 2:40 PM
Simple solution: If weed does become legal, sell it in the liquor stores. They are already established with their 21 plus rules so that is in place. Then when you go to pick up a sixpack you can get some smoke. Then the liquor stores won't lose customers; they will get more customers that are coming in to buy the weed. Everyone wins.
Comment: #9
Posted by: Rick
Wed Oct 27, 2010 3:34 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
David Sirota
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Tom Rosshirt
Tom RosshirtUpdated 26 May 2012
David Sirota
David SirotaUpdated 25 May 2012

7 Jan 2011 The Money Paradox

16 Jan 2009 That Old Saying In Tennessee

25 Feb 2011 Two Public Pay Standards, One Statement of Values