creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
David Sirota
David Sirota
13 Nov 2009
Where Are the Real Deficit Hawks?

Let's say you're a congressperson or tea party leader looking to champion deficit reduction — a cause … Read More.

6 Nov 2009
We Are What We Trade and How We Trade It

Trade and globalization — when not referencing blockbuster sports transactions or raucous street protests,… Read More.

30 Oct 2009
TARP on Steroids

I recall that September day like it was yesterday — the explosion so stunning, so memorable. It wasn't 9/11/01,… Read More.

Intelligentsia Against Intelligence

In the parlance of our times, the term "Idiocracy" means a nation run by idiots — and the term "idiot" is defined by the dictionary as "an utterly foolish or senseless person" who exhibits "a mental age of less than three years old."

There are obvious reasons to believe America is becoming an Idiocracy — a series of horrendous government and business decisions strongly suggest that we've seen the ascension of utterly foolish, senseless people, many with the mental age of infants (yes, W., I'm looking at you). And if there remained any flicker of hope that we aren't turning into a full-on slobbering Idiocracy, that hope was snuffed out last week by two of the Washington intelligentsia's most respected voices.

First came a now-famous column about Afghanistan by the Washington Post's David Broder. The "dean" of the press corps attacked President Obama not for choosing any particular policy, but for simply taking time to meticulously consider his options in the Central Asian quagmire. "The urgent necessity," Broder asserted, "is to make a decision — whether or not it is right."

This was followed by Jackson Diehl, the Post's foreign policy "expert." He wrote that the White House's assiduous Afghanistan deliberations are not a sign of reassuring prudence after the bring-it-on Bush years, but instead a "compelling cause for unease about this president." Diehl's rationale for such an incendiary statement? He alleged (without proof, of course) that "there is unanimity in the Pentagon and considerable agreement in Congress and among the NATO allies" that a military escalation has to happen — and therefore Obama "knows (the pro-escalation) course he must take" but "can't bring himself to embrace it."

Let's set aside the nauseating spectacle of two well-heeled journalists, comfortably protected far away from the front lines, demanding a president immediately send thousands of soldiers to their potential deaths without regard for blood-and-guts consequences.

Let's just, if we can, put that grotesque immorality in a corner and pretend it's not important — and let's go to the deeper, even more disturbing message.

As leading opinionmakers, Broder and Diehl are paid to carefully ponder issues and then offer their considered thoughts. That's not part of what they're supposed to do — it's what they are singularly employed to do. It's how they earn their living and credibility — indeed, it's their entire raison d'etre. And yet, these leading lights of the intelligentsia are overtly preaching anti-intelligence, insisting the president must avoid taking time to think through his actions.

This isn't interpretation — it's what these Beltway sages are literally saying. Broder is explicitly demanding Obama make a knee-jerk decision — any decision — even if it has catastrophic consequences. Likewise, Diehl is calling for Obama to immediately risk thousands of American lives simply because that's what Diehl believes the establishment wants.

Let's be clear — these are just two of many similar examples. Today, screeds calling for leaders to prioritize lightning-fast decisions over measured deliberations are increasingly commonplace in the Washington intelligentsia, even after an Iraq debacle brought on by the same ideological know-nothingism.

The trend is deeply disturbing. It's one thing for talk-show-host wannabe Sarah Palin or carnival-barking provocateur Glenn Beck to glamorize willful ignorance — that's been the narcissistic act of celebrity court jesters since the dawn of history. But it's an entirely different thing when hostility to intelligence and to the basic process of thinking itself emanates from the very professional thinkers who lead the nation's intelligentsia.

When that happens — when the supposed guardians of political cognition and empiricism begin publicly flaying leaders for taking time to fully evaluate potential decisions — it's a sign our country is becoming the ignorance-deifying Idiocracy we should all fear.

David Sirota is the author of the best-selling books "Hostile Takeover" and "The Uprising." He hosts the morning show on AM760 in Colorado and blogs at OpenLeft.com. E-mail him at ds@davidsirota.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS.COM


AddThis Social Bookmark Button
More
David Sirota
Nov. `09
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Connie Schultz icon
Connie SchultzUpdated 22 Nov 2009
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 21 Nov 2009
Alexander Cockburn
Alexander CockburnUpdated 20 Nov 2009

2 May 2008 The Plague of Potomac Fever

1 May 2009 With Their Magic Bullet, Dems Have No More Excuses

25 Sep 2009 Country Club Etiquette Trumps Legislative Results