creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Connie Schultz icon
Connie Schultz
23 May 2012
Catholic Leaders Must Dial Down the Rhetoric

As a non-Catholic, I wrestled with an internal conflict over the birth control battle of the bishops. Part of … Read More.

16 May 2012
Dear Young Mothers: Ignore Time Magazine

In February 1989, I ended a phone interview for a magazine story I was writing and looked up to find my 21-month-… Read More.

9 May 2012
Finally, the President Says 'I Do'

This was going to be a different kind of column. My friend Jackie, through a mutual contact, arranged for me … Read More.

We're in a New York State of Mind -- Sort Of

Share Comment

Looks as if Ohio and New York have something in common, and it's not coveting the future career of LeBron James.

We care about kids. And we cared about them in the same week.

Well, sort of.

First, in New York:

Last week, the state Senate passed a bill that, for the first time, will require paid holidays, sick days, overtime and vacation pay for an estimated 200,000 domestic workers. The New York State Assembly passed a similar bill last year; once the differences between the two bills are hammered out, Gov. David A. Paterson is expected to sign the final version into law. New York will be the first state in the country to pass protections for such workers, who will be covered regardless of their immigration status. Most of them, of course, are nannies.

An FYI to those 'Mericans getting their undies in a knot over New York's efforts to protect nannies who work here illegally: Breathe deep and tug at your waistbands. Most immigration advocates insist undocumented domestic workers are so terrified of getting caught that there's no way they feel entitled to a "thank you," let alone a legal right. So those employers probably will ignore the law — and get away with it, too.

Whew, right?

Nevertheless, this is groundbreaking legislation, which illustrates a singular truth about America that is as troubling as it is enduring. For all our claims to cherishing our children, we continue to entrust their care and well-being to some of the lowest-paid workers in the country.

Think about that. These women are intimately involved with the lives of other people's children, during their most formative years. They bathe, feed and potty train those babies. They comfort other mothers' children when they hurt, discipline them when they need it and bear witness to more milestones than most parents want to admit: First steps. First words. First tastes of ice cream.

Yet these same women typically make less than a long list of hourly wage earners, including doormen, hairdressers and bartenders at high-end restaurants.

But we love our children, by golly.

In fact, a lot of them are practically bursting from our lack of attention.

Which brings me to Ohio and the bill passed last week by our state legislators in the House.

The bill, which Gov. Ted Strickland is expected to sign into law, is aimed at reducing the number of obese children by eliminating junk food and soda pop in school lunchrooms. Schools are also supposed to keep track of kids' body mass index in kindergarten and third, fifth and ninth grades.

What a leap for children's health.

Well, "leap" may be a little strong. More like a bunny hop. Little bunny, on the short side. With a limp.

For one thing, the law wouldn't take effect until 2014. A whole lot of chips and cola can be gobbled up between now and 2014.

As for monitoring children's body mass index: Fat chance. Schools can opt out.

The bill also was going to require 30 minutes of daily exercise. Buh-bye to that, too. School districts managed to get the mandatory part kicked to the curb. Now it's going to be a pilot project for districts willing to volunteer for it. After all, what does physical fitness have to do with a child's ability to focus, focus, focus and pass a standardized test?

Health advocates estimate that one-third of Ohio's children are already overweight or obese. Cry me a river. We've got the future to think about. If we let the government actually do something about the food that kids eat in government-funded schools, the next thing you know we'll have a state full of fit kids and ne'er-do-well parents who sit on their duffs all day.

Take it from state Rep. Kris Jordan, who spoke out against the bill. He knows.

"Just like welfare," he said. "You take away a man or woman's responsibility to work and provide for their family, they become lazy. Also, if you take away responsibilities and obligations of a parent and give it to the government — like feeding their children — parents become lazier, and this laziness spreads and weakens families."

If you were waiting for him to make sense, you must be a New Yorker.

Connie Schultz is a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist for The Plain Dealer in Cleveland and an essayist for Parade magazine. To find out more about Connie Schultz (cschultz@plaind.com) and read her past columns, please visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
Connie,
When we the people (the government) actually place our children and the individuals in our society that take care of them at the high priority that is required and deserved we will have gone a long way to addressing most of the ills of our society. Thanks for pointing out these fledgling efforts in New York and Ohio.
Jim Grissom
Comment: #1
Posted by: Jim Grissom
Sat Jun 5, 2010 10:33 PM
Dear Connie,
Love your columns. I especially liked the one "Give the kids a real summer." The column reminded me of my summers when I was a kid some 68 years ago. We went out and played until lunch and back until supper and then again to play flashlight tag. We roamed the neighborhoods and weren't afraid of being taken or any of the terrible things the kids have to watch out for today. We played ball in a field. The best blackberries were in a field. We picked them and brought them home for mom to make pie. We would eat a lot, too. We always had a garden that my dad made. He did all the work in the garden and the best tomatoes in the world. Lettuce, peas, corn, etc. Mom was a stay at home mom so she did the housework. She was a "room" mother before they gave what she did a title. She baked for the "cake walks." and PTO. My Dad worked at Republic Steel so he didn't participate in school things. That was Mom's job. Thanks again for the beautiful memories.
Sincerely, Pat Zoccali
Comment: #2
Posted by: pat zoccali
Mon Jun 7, 2010 8:50 AM
I'll bet that most of the Ohio legislature, as well as the "health advocates" mentioned in the article, are themselves overweight. You're not going to solve a country-wide epidemic by worrying about schoolchildren. If you're serious about changing the culture, you start taxing foods that are high in fat and sugar, end the subsidies for corn syrup, require food processors to label foods accurately (note: "dehydrated cane juice" is "sugar"), force restaurants to pay an extra tax on any meal served that's more than 1000 calories, mandate exercise in the workplace -- starting with congress and all government offices, institute pay cuts and higher insurance rates for people who remain overweight for ten years, unless they can prove a medical disability. None of this will ever happen of course, so we're likely to be treated to a society that gets fatter and fatter and fatter. The poor schoolkids are simply scapegoats -- I want to see some Ohio legislators getting buff before they start telling kids what to eat and when to exercise.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Geoffrey James
Mon Jun 7, 2010 9:55 AM
While I applaud eliminating junk food from the school menus, Rep. Kris Jordan does have a point. Schools are in the business of educating children, not raising them 100%. Parents are the ones responsible for cultivating good eating habits in their children. A child who is raised with vegetables for dinner, fruit for dessert, and water or fresh juice for drinks is likely to continue to make healthier food choices at school. A child who gets healthy food at home is not likely to become obese because they have an occasional pepsi or some chips. A child who get junk at home for breakfast and dinner as well as all meals on weekends, however, is not going to be protected from obesity by a salad lunch 5 days a week.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Ariana
Tue Jun 8, 2010 11:17 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Connie Schultz
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Tom Rosshirt
Tom RosshirtUpdated 26 May 2012
David Sirota
David SirotaUpdated 25 May 2012

25 Oct 2009 Suddenly We Care About Others' Paid Sick Leave

17 Jul 2007 Parents Must Share the Magic

19 May 2010 Thanks, LeBron James, Even if You Leave