creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Connie Schultz icon
Connie Schultz
23 May 2012
Catholic Leaders Must Dial Down the Rhetoric

As a non-Catholic, I wrestled with an internal conflict over the birth control battle of the bishops. Part of … Read More.

16 May 2012
Dear Young Mothers: Ignore Time Magazine

In February 1989, I ended a phone interview for a magazine story I was writing and looked up to find my 21-month-… Read More.

9 May 2012
Finally, the President Says 'I Do'

This was going to be a different kind of column. My friend Jackie, through a mutual contact, arranged for me … Read More.

So Much for Folksy

Share Comment

Any person who runs for president risks his or her life to lead this country.

There is a reason for the armored cars and the police dogs, the security sweeps and the armed sentries. Such caution is forged from some of the darkest moments in American history.

No candidate is more aware of the dangers than Barack Obama, who was assigned Secret Service protection earlier than any presidential candidate in history. Racist threats of violence prompted his early security.

To suggest that any major candidate for president is un-American is absurd. Why risk your life for a country you don't believe in? But saying it about Obama and accusing him of consorting with terrorists, as Sarah Palin is doing now, comes perilously close to crossing the line between campaign rhetoric and hate speech.

Two days after she winked and doggoned her way through the vice presidential debate, Palin told a cheering crowd that Obama has been "palling around with terrorists who would target their own country."

Palin actually was referring to one person, William Ayers, who is a former member of the radical group Weather Underground, which carried out several domestic bombings when Obama was a child. Ayers never was convicted of any wrongdoing, and he is now a college professor and education activist in Chicago.

Obama served with Ayers on a community board, and Ayers once hosted a coffee for the candidate early in Obama's career. As numerous news sources already have reported, the men are not close, and Obama has denounced Ayers' involvement with the radical group.

Palin, though, is insisting that Americans should be very, very afraid of Barack Obama:

"And I am just so fearful that this is not a man who sees America the way that you and I see America, as the greatest source for good in this world. I'm afraid this is someone who sees America as imperfect enough to work with a former domestic terrorist who had targeted his own country."

In keeping with the theme, Mike Scott, an introductory speaker at one of Palin's rallies, wore his sheriff's uniform and referred to the Democratic nominee as "Barack Hussein Obama." Neither he nor Palin mentioned that Obama is a born-in-America Christian.

It's impossible to deny where this campaign is headed.

It's also impossible to reconcile this bile with the conservatives' attempt to cast Palin as just one folksy and patriotic gal who speaks for regular Americans.

There's nothing folksy in stoking unfounded fear with the potential to incite. And there is nothing patriotic in falsely characterizing the first black nominee for president as a terrorist sympathizer.

Obama is not above scrutiny. Some have questioned why he would associate even loosely with Ayers and how he could not have known about Ayers' radical past. Fair questions.

It's also fair to ask why Palin ever associated with the Alaskan Independence Party, which her husband joined for a period of time in the 1990s. Both Palins attended two conventions for the radical party, which has called for a revote on Alaska's statehood and a draft constitution for an independent Republic of Alaska.

Does that sound like a political party that loves America? No. Does her husband's membership in that party suggest that Sarah Palin doesn't love America? Just as emphatically: No.

See how fairness works?

Recently, National Review Editor Rich Lowry swooned like an overheated teenager over Palin's debate performance:

"I'm sure I'm not the only male in America who, when Palin dropped her first wink, sat up a little straighter on the couch and said, 'Hey, I think she just winked at me,'" he wrote. "And her smile … was so sparkling it was almost mesmerizing. It sent little starbursts through the screen and ricocheting around the living rooms of America."

The winks, the betchas, all that bragging about hockey moms.

It all would be so cute if her tactics weren't so darn ugly.

Connie Schultz is a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist for The Plain Dealer in Cleveland and the author of two books from Random House: "Life Happens" and "… and His Lovely Wife." To find out more about Connie Schultz (cschultz@plaind.com) and read her past columns, please visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
Associating with terrorist's? Let's look at this and define "terrorist". Look at McCain's alliances and ask yourself which is the greater threat to our country. "McCain... a 26-year Washington insider who is now the (corporate darling)and trusted candidate of America's corporate establishment. He's such a reliable conformist to the corporate agenda that, at last count, 177 lobbyists for Big Oil, Wall Street banks, telecommunications giants and other industries form the very core of his campaign. The campaign manager, chief strategist, top economic advisor, foreign policy director and fundraising chairman — lobbyists all." Corporate establishment is actually a now defunct word. Considering the damage they've done to our country and the global economy, corporate Terrorists is actually more accurate. If McCain and Palin get in you'll have corporate Terrorists at the helm; with Palin, forget freedom of religion and separation of Church and State. Whatever rights and religious freedoms you think you now have will be stripped away due to the passage of laws that suit not only their political, but also their religious agenda. The corporate serpant has many heads. As we chop off one, others appear. If two terrorist sympathizers are running for President, ask yourself if this is the best America can do? Is this the product of our loins? Unfortunately, it seems so.
Comment: #1
Posted by: liz
Wed Oct 8, 2008 9:19 AM
Concerning the Article Connie wrote.This article did have merit. The part where she states that questioning Palin's patriotic values makes no sense did help me to understand where people are coming from when they state that they are offended when people refer to the fact that Barack Hussein Obama associated with domestic terrorists.

Fortunately, there has been nothing written about Mrs. Palin associating with terrorists, has there? The fact that they belonged to a group that felt that the direction the country was headed in wasn't working for their home state of Alaska , doesn't make them terrorists, does it? It seems that they were working within the system to accomplish their desired goals.

It also doesn't change the fact that Barack Hussein Obama did associate with terrorists, does it? I wonder what it was that Ayers saw in Barack Hussein Obama that made Ayers say to himself, " This Obama, he's my kind of guy. I'm going to do what I can to advance his career."

And what is it that people find so upseting about using Obama's full name? Are most presidents refered to in some similar fashion?
Comment: #2
Posted by: Stan Williams
Wed Oct 8, 2008 4:53 PM
Ma'am;... Mrs. Palin has the mind of the middle class and the voice of Rocky the flying squirrel. This nonsense going on is old hat, and old hate. It is not made to illuminate but to ignite fear, hatred, and distrust. What every president should be able to begin a term with, a honeymoon, a chance, the benefit of a doubt will be denied to Mr. Obama. If the republicans win with such tactics, what will they have won? Are the democrats supposed to go along with it? The republicans expecting Mr. Obama will win hope to sow poison all over his administration. They will divide, and as often before, the will bedevil the government from a minority position. They are making a point of calling Mr. Obama, Hussain. They are pointing out his terrorist ties, and suggest he might be taking terrorist money from abroad, and the audience is shouting kill him! Is this America? Can we afford such hatred if it slows the ability of government to react or act? We have seen this before. This is white water 2. This is calling into question a man's fitness to govern, not on the basis of fact, but upon slander. It is criminal, and stupid. But it is what the republicans do. If they cannot win, they steal the ball and run home. I don't think that party government works. Parties are not officially in our constitution. They rather abuse the constitution. But we see to what extent the republicans seek power. It does not matter if it is a soldier, or a Cia Agent, or a democratic party candidate. If they want the power they will endanger any life, and any person. Sane people would realize they have gone too far. I mean; they do nothing to disencourage threats of assassination. Instead they trot out lies that do not just destroy any hope of the truth, but rob reason from out of the process, and thieve the authority out of the office. It is aimed at weakening the candidate in office andnot at gaiining office... It is not good. It is dangerous, and I think illegal, but only natural considering the great power attached to the office. They should remember that the office is an honor. If they do not recieve the honor they should still try to deserve it...Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #3
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Wed Oct 8, 2008 5:46 PM
Re: Stan Williams...Sir;... Mrs. Palins voice is an act of terror. ...The Sound is like being stuck in a time warp with a preacher who never reaches the point. I couldn't spend ten minutes listening to her if i was on my death bed and she was reciting the Lords Prayer. Her husband must be deaf, and gets by reading snarly lips. Thanks....Sweeney
Comment: #4
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Thu Oct 9, 2008 10:22 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Connie Schultz
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Tom Rosshirt
Tom RosshirtUpdated 26 May 2012
David Sirota
David SirotaUpdated 25 May 2012

24 Jul 2007 Keep Your Cool on the Road

16 Nov 2007 A Bid for Freedom of Speech

28 May 2008 With Today's Gas Prices, There's No Place Like Home