creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Connie Schultz icon
Connie Schultz
23 May 2012
Catholic Leaders Must Dial Down the Rhetoric

As a non-Catholic, I wrestled with an internal conflict over the birth control battle of the bishops. Part of … Read More.

16 May 2012
Dear Young Mothers: Ignore Time Magazine

In February 1989, I ended a phone interview for a magazine story I was writing and looked up to find my 21-month-… Read More.

9 May 2012
Finally, the President Says 'I Do'

This was going to be a different kind of column. My friend Jackie, through a mutual contact, arranged for me … Read More.

How To Talk to Someone Who Sounds Racist

Share Comment
What should we do when racism catches us off-guard?

I don't mean those anonymous comments on blogs or strangers who shout racial epithets from speeding cars. That's horrifying behavior, but we don't feel empowered to do much about it.

It's a different story, though, when someone we know, maybe even love, says something that makes our neck hairs stand up and our mouths drop open like codfish.

What do we do?

The one thing we shouldn't do, says Jay Smooth, is call the person racist.

"When you say, 'I think he's a racist,' that's not a bad move because you might be wrong," says Smooth, a video blogger in New York. "That's a bad move because you might be right."

Smooth is founder of the hip-hop video blog "Ill Doctrine," at www.illdoctrine.com. His video "How To Tell People They Sound Racist" is growing a following on the Web and is showing up in college curricula. And for good reason. In three fast, but powerful minutes, Smooth delivers a primer for anyone who wants to initiate an actual conversation about race.

"There's a lot of discussion about race, but it's a conversation full of trepidation," Smooth said in a phone interview last week. "Some talk about prejudice as if it were like a pregnancy: You either are or you aren't. But it's not always that simple."

This conversation is a personal one for the 35-year-old Smooth. His parents divorced when he was 3, and he spent his childhood navigating two worlds. His father is black and lives in Harlem. His mother is white and lives on Manhattan's Upper West Side.

"I went to a very elite school during the day and then often went home to Dad's place in Harlem," he said, laughing. "Makes you think about a lot of things."

Smooth is smart and funny, which makes him the perfect instructor in this imperfect world. Response to racism, he says in the video, tends to fall along one of two lines: the "what they did" conversation and the "what they are" conversation.

It's very important, he says, to choose the right conversation.

The first approach focuses strictly on the person's words and actions.

That's a good thing.

The other approach "uses what they did and what they said to draw conclusions about what kind of person they are." Smooth says this tactic is a "rhetorical Bermuda Triangle, where everything drowns in a sea of empty posturing."

In the video, he imitates the typical scenario that unfolds after a celebrity makes a racist comment. After an initial apology, a string of puffed-up celebrities insist their buddy is not a racist and say, "How dare you claim to know what's inside their soul just because they made one little joke about watermelon, tap-dancing and going back to Africa?"

Just like that, the conversation derails; the offender is let off the hook, and nobody learns a thing.

Smooth's advice reminds me of a conversation I had recently with a friend who is black. He listened patiently as I whined about how hard it is to nudge people on the issue of race.

Then he set me straight.

"Your problem," he said, "is that you want everyone to have that kumbaya moment and feel the change in their hearts. I don't need that. They can take all the time they want to drag their hearts along, but I want their words and deeds to change right now because what they do can have an impact on my children and on my grandchildren."

Smooth puts it this way:

"When somebody picks my pocket, I'm not going to be chasing him down so I can figure out whether he feels like he's a thief deep down in his heart. I'm going to be chasing him down so I can get my wallet back. I don't care what he is, but I need to hold him accountable for what he did."

Calling a person names never will change anything.

Calling a person out, though, just might change everything.

Watch Jay Smooth's video below.



Connie Schultz is a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist for The Plain Dealer in Cleveland and the author of two books from Random House: "Life Happens" and "… and His Lovely Wife." To find out more about Connie Schultz (cschultz@plaind.com) and read her past columns, please visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
So just what is the point here? That we should all walk on eggs, constantly looking over our shoulders for the ever-watchful speech police and sensitivity brigade, afraid to make an innocent remark or tell a joke that might be construed as "racist"?
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
Political Correctness has run amok in our culture. If a commentator said that Barack Obama has about as much substance as cotton candy, he'd be accused of racism for mentioning the word "cotton" in connection with a black man.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
What we need is not MORE sensitivity, but LESS. People ought to start having thicker skins and not go whining and moaning every time they hear a racial insult, whether real or imagined (and the latter is true more than half the time). In other words, people need to GROW UP.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Scot Penslar
Sun Oct 5, 2008 10:30 AM
Ma'am; my fourteen year old daughter was registering voters, wearing an Obama button. I was tagging along...A thirty something woman walked by and and said: I'm not voting for no Acorns. Acorns? I haven't heard that one since Mohammed AlI called one of his black challengers, Acorn, I thought, in reference to the shape of his shaved head... In any event, the woman got into a beater, and drove off. Well; I guess I'm not voting for an Acorn either. I will vote for Mr. Obama, but mostly I am voting against four more years tacked onto eight years of government that did not seem to hear the people no matter how much the people cried out loud... Will that woman vote at all? Clearly she has not done so well under the republicans. I met another guy in the same condition with two little twin girls and and an impatient wife. While his kids tore the heads off a bunch of hardy mums oustide of a store he explained his vote was on the basis of a single issue: Abortion. Morality is not a single issue. Morality is not a part of society, but is society, and to expect that only the individual at the bottom will be moral is irrational. She registered him. I just let him talk.... We all want a moral society, but to think poverty does not cause abortions is crazy. This bailout is going to cost thousand of children their lives. People will not have them. They will look at each other and say: not tonight honey...We're broke. Reagan's deficit and hisadministration cost us a child. We simply could not afford another. But it was our due... We worked hard. We followed the rules. We didn't drink or smoke. We took care of business, but business did not take care of us. So, let those people who can be swayed by hatred or a false morality vote republican. I am not voting for any acorns. I am only voting for change, and I hope the hard core democrats understand that. We need change...Niether party represents me. I look at the democrats like the man at the funeral who was asked to say something nice about the deceased; and who said: His brother was worse.....Both partiesfeed on me and both enable those who feed on me. But, some times a change is as good as a vacation!...Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #2
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Tue Oct 7, 2008 5:22 AM
It does not seem right that these days how people turn playful and innocent comment to a racial issue or slavery thing. we are all beings in this world trying to do what is good. If someone did not like a person no breath would be wasted on anyone.
Because the person is black person can not say anything to them. I have stood up against human rights issue and for what is good and right as i was growing up in life. I felt bad that such things did exist and i felt bad about it. And now i am shot down with comment reaching out to an situation to agree and i am at a spot for making my saying to slavery thing. We were all cleaning and to lighten up the situation of cleaning i said you can clean my house and I would clean yours! Well, I can not afford anyone to clean my place. Something of this nature and I did not mean anything by it. Just to break the monotony of work of cleaning. I am appalled that these people are doing this to trouble me. Yet I apologized because she was making big stink about it after a month! And I am in the hot water again. Now I can not speak or say anything to these types of people. I suppose precaution is needed on certain types of people most of the times. Still........sad how......
Comment: #3
Posted by: sam
Mon Jun 21, 2010 8:37 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Connie Schultz
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Tom Rosshirt
Tom RosshirtUpdated 26 May 2012
David Sirota
David SirotaUpdated 25 May 2012

31 Mar 2010 We the People in a Land of 'I's'

2 Nov 2011 Exposing the Horrors of Surgical Fires

20 Feb 2011 Americans 'Deeply Divided' -- Again