creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
brian till
Brian Till
27 Jan 2010
The Dysfunctional Marriage

In April 2001, a green and inward-looking American president had to deal with his first foreign policy crisis:… Read More.

20 Jan 2010
It Gets Loud

It begins modestly enough, with Jack White, a famed if not infamously gritty rocker, rigging together a piece … Read More.

13 Jan 2010
Martin Luther King Jr. Day

If there's anyone out there arguing about the impact of electing a black president on this nation's African-… Read More.

The American Love of Arms

Share Comment

I love to shoot guns as much as the next red-blooded American — hunting rifles at home in Vermont with friends, Glocks in Pittsburgh with cousins; I understand the excitement and the rush and the eventual calm that shooting enthusiasts so enjoy. But at no point in my life have I ever felt compelled to carry or own a gun.

Since Barack Obama has taken office, gun sales across America have surged. Firearm purchases under a Democratic president appear absolutely recession proof.

What is this American fixation with firearms? Is it similar to the macho car fanaticism that's so prevalent here but rather absent elsewhere in the world?

It's a question I've been asked countless times, and one that is nearly impossible to answer. Is it the lasting bloodline of a nation of frontiersmen, born from armed struggle against an empire? Is it the legacy of personal determinacy, of a bootstrap nation that's obsessed with self-sufficiency?

FBI background checks required to purchase firearms numbered 7 million between November and February, up 1.2 million from a year before. The surge may be in part fueled by the collapse of the economy and fears of more prevalent crime, but many are tracing the increase to expectations of tighter regulation emerging from the White House.

The anxiety, many on the left contend, is being unjustly fueled by the National Rifle Association. Regardless of the source, the American affinity for guns baffles me and many in the broader world.

The chances of an armed gunman laying siege to a college- or graduate-level class that I'm part of are small enough that I'd prefer that my classmates and nearsighted professor not have 9 mms lurking in their waistbands. I trust the odds — as I do when boarding a plane — more than a nerd's marksmanship and tactics. I know the most likely situation in which I'll be confronted with an armed rogue will be if he's robbing a local store or place I'm staying — a situation in which all involved are likely best off if he leaves with some cash and all weapons are kept from discharging.

With 250 million guns owned in the U.S.

today — it's as if we're permanently awaiting a siege that'll never come — there's simply no hope of eradicating arms from the American equation.

To the chagrin of conservatives, Nancy Pelosi recently said that Obama doesn't want people's guns, only that their guns be registered. That's a critical first step. But it only has consequences if it's coupled with exceedingly thorough crackdowns on possession of unregistered firearms. In theory, criminals are the only ones who should have such unlicensed goods. Why not raise the marginal cost of gun crimes substantially? Why not make possession of an unregistered firearm, whether one brandishes it or not, a sentence punishable by life in prison?

Avid supporters routinely point to those rare instances in which gun-toting citizens have stopped gunmen amid their rampages, such as in Pearl, Miss., in 1997 — where an assistant principal wielding a handgun stopped a student assassin mid-rampage — as the rationale for a greater share of society carrying weapons. They also point to statistics in which tens of thousands of Americans allege to have drawn a gun in self-defense each year. In how many of those instances were lives truly in danger, though? And how many of such occurrences would have come to be if it weren't so easy for criminals to acquire arms? And do those rare successful heroes really offset those thousand-plus accidental gun deaths per year?

Somehow, the Second Amendment, to my ear, rings of the needs of an agrarian society that knew it would likely find itself under empirical siege once more in the years to come.

The framers, I imagine, weren't likely thinking of a nation armed with B-2 bombers and assault rifles that fire 50 rounds per second when they drafted the amendment. But if they had the foresight to imagine such weapons, wouldn't they have perhaps written the Second in a deft manner that would lead us to question its applicability? Perhaps putting the clause in reference to a broader context?

"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

Brian Till, one of the nation's youngest syndicated columnists, is a research fellow for the New America Foundation, a think tank in Washington. He can be contacted at till@newamerica.net. To find out more about the author and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Sorry to say this, well not really, how did Brain Till get syndicated? Every article I have read is just a rehash of arguments of liberals of the last few decades. Its the same thing over and over and almost none or no substance or accurate studies to back their claims. Only single events that were over covered by media, that was so "SHOCKING" that we to need to hurry up and ban guns. What Brian didn't mention is that citizens can't own guns that are automatic made after some date 1986. If they did, they would of have to shell out a lot of money for old automatic weapons. Also the highest caliber a citizen can own if .50 caliber. B-2s are part of national defense. Trust me, the founding fathers weren't idiots, they advocated and knew technology was getting better all the time (Ben Franklin was one and he was the oldest of the group). Weapons of war were getting more efficient, stronger, faster, deadlier. What made the founding fathers great was because of their foresight of the nation, people, that these truths, ideas, will remain true no matter how the world changes. Compared to number of rapists, murderers, black on black crime, vs general gun crimes is nothing. Look at countries that put extreme laws on guns especially in the 90s, England, Europe, Australia, and most totalitarian countries. They have high crime rates, don't trust their citizens at all, and/or the people are animals pent up watched over by the Government.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Jim May
Sun Apr 19, 2009 11:22 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Brian Till
Jan. `10
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Tom Rosshirt
Tom RosshirtUpdated 26 May 2012
David Sirota
David SirotaUpdated 25 May 2012

18 Jun 2008 Obama's Achilles: The Successful Surge

5 Aug 2009 A New, Lesser GI Bill

17 Dec 2008 Confidence and the Presidency