creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Alexander Cockburn
Alexander Cockburn
25 May 2012
Brave New World, Brave New Majority

    The news is in. White births are no longer a majority in the United States. The Bureau of … Read More.

18 May 2012
Gay Marriage and the Shackles of Matrimony

I think gay marriage is an incredibly boring subject; though, I do like to hear right-wingers say that it … Read More.

11 May 2012
Police Brutality

Let's suppose that the blind Chinese dissident, Chen Guangcheng, remains spunky once he's settled in at New … Read More.

Obama's Dud Svengali

Share Comment

Obama is losing his strong right arm. Dark days lie ahead, in which the president will lose traction with Congress, needlessly offend key constituencies and lose control of his legislative agenda. Why? His chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, is quitting the White House, maybe to try and become mayor of Chicago, certainly to cash in and make a bundle on Wall Street.

But wait! Aren't those dark days already here? Isn't the president's approval rating sinking steadily? Doesn't he face the possible loss of both houses of Congress to the Republicans? Aren't Democrats facing uphill fights in the midterm elections begging him to stay away and not doom them with his shadow?

All these things are true. If Emanuel has been his strong right arm and, in the fawning words of a writer for the Daily Beast, "the man with the political grit and muscle to make (the president's) dreams come true," then perhaps the president will fare better across the next two years fighting with his left hand only, and with a chief adviser at his side endowed with less muscle but more brains and strategic savvy.

Emanuel got flattering press because he fit the cliche profile of a can-do political rough-houser, famously foul-mouthed, someone who would instruct head-in-the-clouds Obama in the coarse political realities of Washington, D.C. But by the time Obama hired him, Emanuel already had a proven record of failure. He favored the war in Iraq, and when he was chairing the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee in 2006, he made great efforts to knock out antiwar Democratic candidates, backing dismal neo-con candidates who duly plummeted to defeat, losing the Democrats seats they would otherwise have won.

It was the supposedly savvy Emanuel who allowed, probably encouraged, Obama to blow his first year on a health reform bill that pleased no one, to construct a poorly designed stimulus bill, to detain him from acting resolutely to save millions of Americans from losing their homes and to bring the arrogant bankers on Wall Street to their knees.

Properly advised, Obama would not have faced, as he did recently, the polite and therefore all the more devastating reproof of a middle-aged, middle-class black woman, Velma Hart, in a town meting in a Washington, D.C., suburb. Hart said, "I'm exhausted of defending you, defending your administration, defending the mantle of change that I voted for, and deeply disappointed with where we are right now."

Obama has had Emanuel guiding him into one disaster after another.

His predecessor in the White House, George W. Bush, fared just as badly, if not worse at the hands of his political counselor, Karl Rove, to this day touted in the press as a past master in the dark arts of dirty politics.

The prime task of a political counselor is to keep his patron's polling numbers high and enhance his political clout. Rove left his employer with ratings in the low 30s, with almost zero political capital in the bank.

As he confided them to his associates, Rove's three aims for Bush's second term were to privatize Social Security — America's public pension system — push through an immigration act and firm up a permanent Republican majority. In the event, social security "reform" was the White House's prime domestic political disaster in 2005. Rove's handling of the immigration bill was so inept that Republican congressional leaders refused to talk to him and told Bush's chief of staff to send someone else. The "permanent Republican majority" turned to ashes in the polling booths in the midterm elections in 2006.

Rove's last turn as arch demon of choice was as the alleged instigator of the firing of several federal prosecutors. Federal prosecutors serve at the pleasure of the president, so their arrivals and departures are always part of everyday political logrolling, as practiced by every presidency in historical memory. As with many of Rove's political duties, this was handled with matchless incompetence and so the Democrats had a field day.

The best chief of staff in living memory was James Baker, a tough Texan lawyer, who served as top aide to both Ronald Reagan and George Bush Sr., ran both the Treasury and the State Department and finally shoe-horned George Bush Jr. into the White House amid the "spoiled vote" crisis in Florida in the 2000 election. No one called Baker a Svengali. He was far too canny a player to have that tag hung round his neck.

In recent weeks, Obama has been saying goodbye to two senior aides, Emanuel and Lawrence Summers, his chief White House economic adviser, another disaster. Prudent to a fault, he'll probably shirk the bold choices that could invigorate the White House in its current beleaguered state.

Alexander Cockburn is co-editor with Jeffrey St. Clair of the muckraking newsletter CounterPunch. He is also co-author of the new book "Dime's Worth of Difference: Beyond the Lesser of Two Evils," available through www.counterpunch.com. To find out more about Alexander Cockburn and read features by other columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
It's Obama who is the real Svengali. By appointing corporatist hacks like Summers, Emanuel, Geithner, Vilsack, ad infinitum, he's able to let his still believing faithful look at his aides as being the culprits, and not himself.

This man is the ultimate empty suit, and while not as extreme as today's GOP, historically viewed he's really just another in a long line of politicians who know which side of the bread he has to butter.

The political argument in today's America of outsourced jobs, endless wars, financialized "economy" and concentrated wealth is on the margins. The Dems want to put some whipped cream on the heaping pile of shit we're being served; the Repubs think you'll eat it plain.
Comment: #1
Posted by: michael nola
Sat Oct 2, 2010 8:43 AM
The earlier battles between Howard Dean and the Democratic Party Stalwarts, and then the struggle with Rahm Emanuel over the DNC cash were telling. Dean was raising much cash from average people with the internet, threatening those whoring for the big money. Dean rolled out a "50 state strategy" that laid the groundwork for the Democratic resurgence, including Obama. Rahm wanted to the DNC money for his slate of centrist Dems. (Some of the same Blue Dogs that now fight against Obama.) Dean refused, rightly.
The "centrists" have been wrong all along, since Clinton. They have taken the party to the right, capitulating at every chance. It has all been so badly handled that even with the country on the trash heap the Dems are taking the blame.
Good riddance to Rahm.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Patrick Hunter
Sun Oct 3, 2010 7:44 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Alexander Cockburn
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Tom Rosshirt
Tom RosshirtUpdated 26 May 2012
David Sirota
David SirotaUpdated 25 May 2012

27 Jul 2007 Violence and American Culture: The Road to Abu Ghraib

16 Apr 2010 This Will Be Obama's Legacy

3 Jun 2011 Will Palin Run? Who Knows? Who Cares?