opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Alexander Cockburn
Alexander Cockburn
13 Jul 2012
The End of America's Armies

Retired Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, bounced out of his job for revels in Paris as witnessed by Rolling Stone, … Read More.

5 Jul 2012
Epitaph to a Dead Movement

It was very hard not to be swept away by the Occupy movement, which established itself in New York's Zuccotti … Read More.

29 Jun 2012
The Affordable Care Act: Decision Effects

It's tempting to say the Affordable Care Act decision spells the end of the Romney candidacy. The Mormon … Read More.

NATO's Debacle in Libya


NATO's failure in efforts to promote "regime change" in Libya, after two and a half months of bombing and arms supply to various rebel factions, is now glaring.

Obviously NATO's commanders are still hoping that a lucky bomb may kill Moammar Gadhafi, but to date the staying power has been with the Libyan leader, whereas it is the relevant NATO powers who are fighting among themselves.

When British Prime Minister Cameron vied with French President Sarkozy in early March in heading the charge against Gadhafi, no weighty hand of caution seems to have disturbed the blithe mood of confidence in London or Paris or Washington, D.C.

The Western press, along with al-Jazeera, was no help. The early charges of Gadhafi committing "genocide" against his own people or ordering mass rapes were based on unverified rumor or propaganda bulletins from Benghazi and have now been decisively discredited by reputable organizations such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch.

The journalists in Benghazi became cheerleaders for what was evidently from the start a disorganized rabble. The journalists in Tripoli were reluctant to file copy that might be deemed by their editors as "soft" on Gadhafi, a devil figure in the West for most of his four decades in power.

On the other hand, history shows that to drop thousands of bombs and missiles, with whatever supposed standards of 'pinpoint accuracy,' is not going to win you the enthusiastic friendship of the civilians you are bombing, albeit in the guise of protecting their lives.

Recent pro-government rallies in Tripoli have been vast. Libya has a population of about 6 million, with 4 million in Tripoli. Gadhafi barrels around the city in an open jeep. Large amounts of AK-47s have been distributed to civilian defense committees. Were they all compelled to demonstrate by Gadhafi's enforcers? It seems unlikely.

Another pointer to NATO's misjudgments was heavy-handed dismissal of charges from African, Russian and even leaders of NATO countries such as Germany that the mandates of two U.N. Security Council resolutions passed in February and then March — the protection of civilian populations — were being brazenly distorted in favor of efforts to kill Gadhafi and install the ramshackle "provisional government" in Benghazi — a shady bunch from the get-go.

The coalition is now falling apart. French Defense Minister Gerard Longuet gave an interview at the end of last week to a French TV station saying that military action against Libya has failed, and it is time for diplomacy: "We must now sit around a table. We will stop bombing as soon as the Libyans start talking to one another and the military on both sides go back to their bases."

Longuet suggested that Gadhafi might be able to remain in Libya, "in another room of the palace, with another title."

If Longuet's startling remarks were for local consumption on the eve of an Assembly vote, it clearly came as a shock to Prime Minister Cameron and U.S.

Secretary of State Clinton. To heighten the impression of a civil war within NATO, Cameron and Clinton rushed out statements asserting the ongoing goal of regime change, and that Gadhafi's departure was a sine qua non, as demanded by the Benghazi gang.

But Italian Prime Minister Berlusconi, his country the objective of tens of thousands of refugees from the fighting and from economic dislocation in Libya, is now saying he was against the whole NATO adventure from the start. He may decline to renew in the autumn current basing agreements in Italy for NATO planes. Germany has always been unenthusiastic.

America is playing a double game, reflective of domestic pressures. At the start, the rush to the U.N. Security Council was very much Hillary Clinton's initiative. In political stature, early to mid-February, President Obama was at his nadir. There was growing talk of a one-term presidency. Clinton rushed into what she perceived as a tempting vacuum. Obama, still fighting the "wimp" label, swiftly endorsed the NATO mission.

In terms of equipment, the U.S. has been crucial. According to one French general, 33 of 41 tanker aircraft used in the operation are American, most of the AWACS, as well, all the drones and 100 percent of the laser-guidance kits for bombs. And that's not all.

The main means of command and control of NATO as the huge bandwidth for transmitting all the data is American. The director of military intelligence, Gen Didier Bolelli, revealed that over 80 percent of the targets assigned to the French pilots in Libya was designated by U.S.

Those whose memories stretch back to the Suez debacle of 1956 might recall that Dwight Eisenhower simply ordered the British, French and Israeli forces to abandon the effort to overthrow Egyptian President Nasser. We could well be seeing a less overt rerun of that conclusive demonstration of post-World War II U.S. dominance, with the Obama administration making the point that any effort at asserting European primacy in the Mediterranean region is doomed to failure.

Before his retirement, U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates took the opportunity to twist the knife in a speech in Brussels: "The mightiest military alliance in history is ... into an operation against a poorly armed regime in a sparsely populated country — yet many allies are beginning to run short of munitions, requiring the U.S., once more, to make up the difference."

He said ominously: "Future U.S. political leaders ... may not consider the return on America's investment in NATO worth the cost."

Even if Obama is in fact wholeheartedly for regime change in Libya, the political temperature here does not favor the sort of escalation — hugely costly and much against the public mood — required in the wake of the failure of the bombing campaign.

Right now, the bill of indictment is not hard to draw up. Three major NATO powers committed their countries to a hugely expensive military operation currently in a shambles, with serious long-term consequences for NATO's credibility and pretences to respect for international law — and to what end?

Alexander Cockburn is co-editor with Jeffrey St. Clair of the muckraking newsletter CounterPunch. He is also co-author of the new book "Dime's Worth of Difference: Beyond the Lesser of Two Evils," available through To find out more about Alexander Cockburn and read features by other columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at



5 Comments | Post Comment
"---We are using MASSIVE third world (ie muslim) immigration
to destroy British culture once and for all ---FOREVER."
Fmr PM/ Globalist/ Cultural and demographics EUGENIST
(Daily Mail interview)

----Likewise for the recalcitrant Middle East.

Franchise slums, cutural genocide and EUGENICS for one and ALLLL.

The call it 'Continuity of Agenda'.

Nuremeberg, the second chapter ----COMING SOON.
Comment: #1
Posted by: free bee
Thu Jul 14, 2011 10:14 PM
What does it say about the leadership of the so called first world when its bombs are smarter than its leaders?

Once again, political leaders who have no first hand knowledge of war and especially the limits of airpower are seduced into thinking that the marvels of technology can overcome all problems.
Comment: #2
Posted by: michael nola
Fri Jul 15, 2011 9:01 AM
NATO has become a puppet of _____________ (you fill in the blank)

Comment: #3
Posted by: Soothsayer
Fri Jul 15, 2011 11:41 AM
"We have opened the floodgates (of immigration)
to humiliate the Right---"
-Gordon Brown
Fmr PM/ Globalist/ Compliant cultural and demographic EUGENIST

"---The Globalists are at war with the REAL economy and
the REAL culture on every level ---everywhere.
---Did you just hear me? --THIS IS TREASON."

Did you? -----------------because IT IS INDEED.
Comment: #4
Posted by: free bee
Fri Jul 15, 2011 9:39 PM
We need to stop all foreign aid to all foreign countries that is in the form of cash payments

Yes this includes the 5 billion cash aid to Israel.

RON PAUL in 2012

He is our only hope

Remember when Ross Perot WARNED US ABOUT NAFTA ???

And America elected Slick Willie instead.

DUH WINNING...............
Comment: #5
Posted by: Soothsayer
Tue Jul 19, 2011 5:15 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Alexander Cockburn
Jul. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 12 Feb 2016
Connie Schultz icon
Connie SchultzUpdated 11 Feb 2016
Joe Conason
Joe ConasonUpdated 11 Feb 2016

20 May 2011 Was Strauss-Kahn Set Up?

19 Oct 2007 Al Gore's Biggest Fan

23 Apr 2010 Marijuana, Boom and Bust