creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Alexander Cockburn
Alexander Cockburn
17 Feb 2012
Hypocrisy and Assad

Few spectacles have been more surreal than senior U.S. officials — starting with the president, the … Read More.

10 Feb 2012
Time for the Tumbrils!

Back in the 1960s, Herbert Marcuse pointed out in one of his books that the Pentagon had given up on verbs. … Read More.

3 Feb 2012
The Port Huron Statement -- 50 Years on

Fifty years ago, a group of students in the American Midwest issued a document rather portentously titled … Read More.

A Year of Obama

Share Comment

A year after Obama's triumphant election, hauling substantial majorities in the House and Senate on his coattails, the progressive sector sits trying to warm its hands before the bonfire of all its hopes. An awful "health reform" bill has cleared the House and is now headed for marriage with some even more ghastly Senate version from which we may be saved only by a filibustering Lieberman, Obama's initial mentor in the Senate.

Meanwhile, the White House is furiously denying reports from such well-regarded correspondents as David Martin of CBS that Gen. Stanley McChrystal will get "most, if not all," of what he wants. Instead of giving him the boot for insolent public challenges to the civilian executive power, Obama will order the dispatch of about 40,000 new troops (CBS's figure) to Afghanistan, representing a long-term commitment as fateful as Lyndon Johnson's surrender to Gen. Westmoreland's request in Vietnam nearly half a century ago.

The progressives poke about among entrails of the House health bill and find evidence of mini-victories like the survival in vestigial form of the "public option" — a fetish phrase guaranteed to raise a loyal cheer whatever the realities, which in this case aren't hard to discover.

As Rose Ann DeMoro, executive director of the California Nurses Association, put it in the wake of the House vote, "The principal beneficiary is not Americans' health but the bottom line of the insurance industry, which stands to harvest tens of billions of dollars in additional profits ordered by the federal government." Or as Democratic Rep. Eric Massa of New York warned before the vote, "At the highest level, this bill will enshrine in law the monopolistic powers of the private health insurance industry, period."

And of course, the House bill reduces public protection for women, with its rollback of reproductive rights in the anti-abortion amendment. The "public option" remnant? It will be available to about 2 percent of people under age 65, mostly those now not covered who buy insurance on their own.

It is as ridiculous to claim that this "health reform" bill has anything substantive to do with beneficial social change as to believe there have been any encouraging shifts in foreign policy since the Democrats took over. Only recently, we had the surreal spectacle of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton claiming in a press conference that what Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu "has offered in specifics of a restraint on the policy of settlements, which he has just described — no new starts, for example — is unprecedented in the context of the prior two negotiations."

Obama's Afghan policy evolved on the campaign trail last year as a one-liner designed to deflect charges that he was a peacenik on Iraq. He formed a foreign policy team mostly composed of Clinton-era neoliberal hawks, headed by Hillary Clinton and Richard Holbrooke.

Then he ordered 17,000 new U.S. troops to be deployed to Afghanistan.

If on his second day in office he'd announced a full and complete review of U.S. aims in Afghanistan, with no option left off the table, he'd have had some purchase on the situation. But the months drifted by, and finally, the worsening situation forced a review of Afghan policy — precisely when Obama's poll numbers were dropping, the war lobby was heartened and the liberals were already dejected by Obama's surrender to Goldman Sachs and Wall Street, and by his fumbling retreats in the health fight.

It's exactly as I predicted from the start. The past year has yielded one surrender by the administration after another — whether it be renditions, phone-tapping or an accelerated schedule in giving the finger to organized labor, whose troops had done the most to put Obama in the White House. Even before his election last November, Obama extinguished all hopes — risible though they were to those who had followed the senator's brief political career — that he would harvest public fury at Wall Street and curb the power of the banks. He voted for the Bush/Paulson bank bailout and then hired Lawrence Summers — one of the prime architects of the country's economic death plunge — as his chief economic adviser. Today, Summers stands alongside Obama in the public pillory, with the rising unemployment figures hanging round his neck.

If you want to see the year's political price for dropping the ball on the greatest political opportunity we'll see in our lifetime to curb the power of Wall Street and set a new economic course, just look at the recent election numbers in Virginia, which voted for a Democratic president last year for the first time since the Johnson sweep of 1964 and handed the Democrats three Republican House seats. In these same three districts earlier in November, Republican Bob McDonnell — running on a we-need-jobs platform and against a terrible climate bill built on junk science — clinched the governor's race by huge margins as independents, seniors, suburban voters and stay-at-home Democrats took out their disillusion with Obama.

Progressives delight in depicting a Republican Party captured by the nutballs, dooming itself to the margins. Don't believe it. The "sophisticated right" (so described by C. Wright Mills 60 years ago) equipped with big Republican money will assert its power over the "wild-eyed Utopian capitalists" (Mills again). Glenn Beck will burst the envelope he's already pushing or be impaled on some disclosure from his fraught psychic past. Sarah Palin will be similarly discredited as a public figure. Next November, Republicans can look forward to recapture of the House and a whittling down of Democrats in the Senate by five or six. Then Obama can fire Rahm Emanuel and hire David Gergen, just as Bill Clinton did in the summer of 1993.

Alexander Cockburn is co-editor with Jeffrey St. Clair of the muckraking newsletter CounterPunch. He is also co-author of the new book "Dime's Worth of Difference: Beyond the Lesser of Two Evils," available through www.counterpunch.com. To find out more about Alexander Cockburn and read features by other columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS.COM


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Had Obama been a true progressive, he could not have had a better situation handed to him by the consequences of 30 years worth of failed policies covering economic, trade, and rampant militarism, but he, like way too many Dems. is not, and never will be a true progressive. History will show that Bill Clinton will go down as the man who solidified Dems surrender to big business, and his followers like Summers, Emanuel, Rubin, Baucus, and the other DLC hacks have retained their power in this Administration despite their proven idiocy. These people, no matter their failures, remain in the D.C. power elite, a group which has no doubt about its superiority to all those it does not recognize on a first name basis. When faced with the choice of a typical Dem (there are some exceptions) and a Repub, your choice is between someone who will violate you with lubricant or bone dry. That is your choice, but either way we know what it's called. We are left watching an allegedly intelligent man wondering why the stimuls and bailout have benefitted no one but the banks and Wall Street, why joblessness continues unabaited and yet it would take only one trip to any mall to see why. The "made in" label rarely says "made in the usa". Here's a hint, "leaders"; in an economy which is 70% consumer driven, you HAVE TO MAKE THINGS YOURSELVES, IF YOU SIMPLY IMPORT OBJECTS AND SELL THEM TO EACH OTHER, MUCH OF IT BOUGHT WITH MONEY YOU BORROWED FROMTHOSE WHO MADE THE OBJECTS, YOU WILL HAVE NOTHING SUSTAINABLE. FURTHER, IF YOUR BEST TECHNOLOGY GOES INTO MAKING DEVICES THAT KILL PEOPLE, WHILE YOU LET YOUR CONSUMER SECTOR WITHER, YOU WILL END UP LOSING OUT TO THOSE WHO DO MAKE THOSE PRODUCTS BECAUSE THOSE PRODUCTS ARE WHAT PEOPLE WANT, AND THEY WANT THEM EVERY DAY; OUR DEATH TOYS ARE NEITHER NEEDED OR WANTED BY MOST. AFTER ALL MOST OF THEM NEED TO BE REPLACED ONCE USED AND HOW MANY COUNTRIES WANT TO DOMINATE ALL OTHERS WHICH IS THE PURPOSE OF THESE TOYS? THE COMMUNIST CHINESE ARE SMARTER THAN OUR LEADERS, THEY KNOW THAT ECONOMIC POWER IS WHAT MATTERS, THAT ONLY DINOSAURS SEEK TO RULE THE EARTH BY FORCE AND THEY END UP BEING SUPERCEDED BY MORE EVOLVED LIFE FORMS. REGARDING AFGHANISTAN, WE ARE FIGHTING THE TALIBAN, A REACTIONARY GROUP THAT DESCENDED FROM THE MUHAJADIN WE AIDED 30 YEARS AGO AGAINST THE USSR AND WHOSE SOLE DESIRE IS TO KICK US OUT AND INSTALL SOME REACTIONARY GOVERNMENT. BIG DEAL, WE DEAL WITH SUCH GOVERNMENTS ALL OVER THE WORLD. THESE PEOPLE HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH 9-11; ARE WE TO INVADE AND OCCUPY ANY COUNTRY WHERE AL-QAEDA MIGHT ONE DAY REESTABLISH ITSELF? CLEARLY, THESE WARS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH TERRORISM AND EVERYTHING TO DO WITH A DYING EMPIRE DOING THE ONLY THING IT KNOWS HOW TO DO AND WHICH FEEDS THE PROFITS OF THE MILITARY DEATH MACHINE AT THE EXPENSE OF TRUE NATIONAL INTERESTS. TERRORISTS ARE NOT AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT TO THIS COUNTRY, AND WE SHOULD REALIZE THAT BY CONFRONTING THEM WITH POLICE WORK, SOLID INTELLIGENCE, AND, WHEN NECESSARY, LIMITED MILITARY STRIKES, BUT THAT WOULDN'T FEED THE WAR MACHINE AND THE EGOS OF THE D.C. POWER ELITE WHO KNOW NOTHING OF WAR BUT JUST CAN'T STOP LOVING IT. THE LEADERS OF THIS COUNTRY ARE DOING JUST WHAT THEY WERE PUT ON THIS EARTH TO DO; RUN US INTO THE GROUND WHILE PURSUING THE NARROW INTERESTS OF THE VERY FEW AT THE EXPENSE OF THE NATION. THIS NATION WILL RIGHT ITSELF WHEN\, AND ONLY WHEN, OUR ATTEMPT AT WORLD DOMINATION COLLAPSES AT OUR FEET AND THE WORLD JUST REFUSES TO STOP LOANING US MONEY AND FINDS SOME OTHER CURRENCY TO BE THE WORLD'S RESERVE CURRENCY. UNTIL THEN, WE'LL KEEP GOING ON OUR WAY, GETTING EVER NEARER THE PRECIPICE.
Comment: #1
Posted by: michael nola
Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:20 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Alexander Cockburn
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 18 Feb 2012
David Sirota
David SirotaUpdated 17 Feb 2012

1 May 2009 King of the Hate Business

11 Feb 2011 The Unvarnished Truth About Ronald Reagan

30 Nov 2007 The New Lost Generation