Recently
Later Love
DEAR SUSAN: My mom was in her late 50s when she found love again after divorcing my dad. She used an online dating site to find it — but this was before the site you mentioned existed. It seems a fine match, and they have been married for …Read more.
A Perfect 10
DEAR SUSAN: I had to laugh at the letter from a man describing himself as a "Richard Gere" looking for a woman who is a professional, intelligent and a perfect 10. The problem might just be in his math! I've noticed that men rate …Read more.
Choose Happiness
DEAR SUSAN: This positive advice is for a fellow blogger, who seems to be having a hard time: It takes work to escape the comfort zone that keeps you making the same mistakes. (It's easier if you have the help of a good therapist, but people have …Read more.
The Uninvited
DEAR SUSAN: Your column on being left out of a couple's world has made me respond to an advice columnist for the first time in my life. The problem is much bigger than you seem to realize. When I was part of a couple, we did a lot of socializing. I …Read more.
more articles
|
Common CauseDEAR SUSAN: I find that most angry/bitter single people are that way because they are trying to date "up" instead of looking for someone who has more in common with them financially and in terms of appearance and fitness. Think about it! As for the guy who's steamed because women only care about a man's paycheck, give me a break. As if a lawyer wants to date a Wal-Mart greeter! Male or female, we tend to go for people who have things in common with us — ambition, hygiene, looks, friends, intellect, etc. Why is that so hard to get?! — From the "Single File" blog DEAR BLOGGER: Well, for one thing, because it's only human to smooth over our own rough spots, self-deception that in the short term keeps us feeling quite comfortable about ourselves — and well-prepared for the rigors of dating. But masks have a nasty way of slipping with time, and the outcome isn't pretty: romance on the rocks. But the person unmasked, the "up" trader, is left with a shaky self-image, worse even than dashed hopes. Relive that scenario a few times and the (un)masked marvel slides into disillusion that inevitably hardens into anger and bitterness, not exactly a winning formula for the real thing. Lesson learned? To thine own self be true, and you cannot then be false to anyone.
DEAR SUSAN: Which method of finding a monogamous relationship, the intimate or multiple, is correct? As for me, I thoroughly enjoy sex and also would love to be in a monogamous relationship. We learn our core beliefs about morals, values and sex in childhood, but I am wondering whether one can change them as an adult without hurting oneself or others. I'm not afraid of the water, because I took swimming lessons; but when it comes to sex, I evidently didn't learn all the right lessons. And I don't think I'm in this boat alone. — From the "Single File" blog DEAR BLOGGER: You and I can share thoughts about sexuality; I have my opinions and a feeling for the unmarried mentality — but the issue is highly personal, and I know better than to offer dogma. But being an adviser to the unmarried allows me a privileged glimpse into their sex lives, and I know the sorrow and regrets of being a casual sex casualty. (I do believe that even when sex is meant to be casual, one partner is silently yearning for more.) The truth is that most of us have a personal comfort zone in our sex lives, and it is — gasp — conservative. My opinion? Most of us are wired for monogamy. If you'd like to share more, write for my Sexual Bill of Rights. It's free, on parchment, suitable for framing or the fridge door. Have a question for Susan? Send it to her in care of this newspaper or online at www.creators.com. COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM
|
||||||||||||||||||||||





























