creators home
creators.com lifestyle web
Dr. David Lipschitz

Recently

Dealing With Stress Is a Key Element in Preventing Disease While stress is a natural part of life and the natural way we respond to challenges, it does cause both acute and chronic hormonal changes that lead to high blood pressure, mood disorders, alterations in immune function, increases in cholesterol and …Read more. Age-Related Muscle Loss and Weakness can Be Prevented by Weight Training Growing older is always accompanied by gradual loss of muscle that is replaced by fat. Despite gaining weight from about 25 onward, we also lose muscle, so that at age 50 our total muscle mass is about 70 percent of that at age 30, and by aged 80 …Read more. Even the Most Loving Caregiver Is Vulnerable to Elder Abuse. It is almost impossible to imagine a loving spouse or child striking out and abusing their partner or parent. It is a sad fact, however, that in the majority of cases a family member is the abuser. Abuse occurs in every setting and is just as common …Read more. We Can Do Much to Hold Down Medication Costs Recently, the National Institutes of Health urged physicians to prescribe a water pill, called hydrochlorothiazide, as the initial treatment for hypertension. Despite a large study that showed this water pill was as effective in lowering blood …Read more.
more articles

Heartsaver CT Scan More Often a Heartbreaker

Comment

Once again, new information about CT scans of the heart muddies the waters on the procedure, its effectiveness and its role in detecting heart disease. An article just published in the New England Journal of Medicine demonstrated that measuring the amount of calcium in coronary arteries using a heart CT scan is a sensitive predictor of heart attacks in men and women of all ethnic groups (blacks, Hispanics, Asians and whites), irrespective of age.

The authors suggest that this simple noninvasive approach will make the diagnosis of coronary artery disease quicker and more accurate. Adding the CT scan to other risk factors of coronary artery disease — such as high blood pressure, elevated cholesterol, being a male, having a strong family history of heart disease and cigarette smoking — increased the chance of accurately identifying heart disease from 79 percent to 83 percent.

On the surface, the heart CT scan seems like a simple, easy and effective way to identify coronary artery disease. However, there are serious concerns. In an editorial in the same journal, Dr. W.S. Weintraub questions whether the test adds any benefit to other screening tests, suggesting it is not cost-effective, and the amount of irradiation is so excessive that it could increase the risk of cancer.

While there is little debate that a CT scan can provide an incredibly detailed picture of the heart, the greatest concern is what is done when a problem is identified. Today, hospitals across the nation are offering a "Heartsaver CT scan" to screen for coronary artery disease for as little as $100. The result is thousands of asymptomatic adults flocking to hospitals to take advantage of this amazingly cheap "preventive" treatment.

Those with high calcium scores are referred to a cardiologist and, despite not having any symptoms, are tested further by stress tests and angiograms. Narrowed arteries are often opened by angioplasty and placing of a stent. On occasion, the patient is referred for coronary bypass grafting surgery (CABG).

While many patients and physicians swear that this is "lifesaving" therapy, there is little evidence that this approach is of value.

In fact, there is no proven scientific study to demonstrate that invasive procedures on healthy individuals with a positive calcium score are of any clinical benefit. Angioplasty does not prevent heart attacks or prolong life, and it should be limited to patients with symptoms such as chest pain or shortness of breath. Here, angioplasty can be of some benefit, particularly in those patients who have found no relief with medications.

CABG does prolong life in select patients with isolated blockage of the left main coronary artery, in diabetics, and in those with severe damage to the heart muscle that significantly impairs its ability to pump blood out of the heart. But in asymptomatic individuals with significant narrowing of multiple coronary arteries, the evidence of benefit is marginal, particularly if the patient is committed to a heart-healthy lifestyle.

Sadly, I know of many asymptomatic patients over the age of 70 who, lured by the promise of a Heartsaver CT, were diagnosed with a high calcium score and received invasive, aggressive therapy. I will never forget the patient who, at age 78, had a Heartsaver CT. She had a high calcium score and was referred to a cardiologist, who told her she needed immediate surgery. She had major complications and spent the last three years of her life in a nursing home. Prior to her surgery she was healthy, happy and independent.

The heart CT scan is best used for patients experiencing shortness of breath or chest pain. In this circumstance, it can help determine the cause of the symptoms. But for the healthy, and particularly for those over age 70, the heart CT should be used sparingly, if at all. Everyone from middle age and beyond should consider himself at high risk of heart disease.

As such, we should all live a heart-healthy lifestyle — eat a healthy diet, exercise, take an aspirin a day, stop smoking, and treat elevated blood pressure and cholesterol. The greatest role of the heart CT scan is to help patients understand their risk of heart attack. For healthy, asymptomatic middle-aged adults, these scans ultimately confirm what we already should know — it simply does not make sense.

Dr. David Lipschitz is the author of the book "Breaking the Rules of Aging." To find out more about Dr. David Lipschitz and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com. More information is available at www.drdavidhealth.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
My husband just has results from this test...his # was 146...what does this mean ? does it fall in the middle of the scale or above...would like to know the range of numbers..please help me to understand
Comment: #1
Posted by: Dorothy Hernandez
Wed Mar 7, 2012 11:51 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
Other similar columns
Dr. Rallie McAllister
Your Health
by Dr. Rallie McAllister
Jennifer Merin
Around the World
by Jennifer Merin
Marilynn Preston
Energy Express
by Marilynn Preston
More
Dr. David Lipschitz
Aug. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month