creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Thomas Sowell
Thomas Sowell
14 Feb 2012
The 'Progressive' Legacy

Although Barack Obama is the first black President of the United States, he is by no means unique, except for … Read More.

14 Feb 2012
The Progressive Legacy: Part II

"Often wrong but never in doubt" is a phrase that summarizes much of what was done by Presidents … Read More.

14 Feb 2012
The Progressive Legacy: Part III

The same presumptions of superior wisdom and virtue behind the interventionism of Progressive Presidents … Read More.

The Mosque Controversy

Share Comment

The proposed mosque near where the World Trade Center was attacked and destroyed, along with thousands of American lives, would be a 15-story middle finger to America.

It takes a high IQ to evade the obvious, so it is not surprising that the intelligentsia are out in force, decrying those who criticize this calculated insult.

What may surprise some people is that the American taxpayer is currently financing a trip to the Middle East by the imam who is pushing this project, so that he can raise the money to build it. The State Department is subsidizing his travel.

The big talking point is that this is an issue about "religious freedom" and that Muslims have a "right" to build a mosque where they choose. But those who oppose this project are not claiming that there is no legal right to build a mosque near the site of the World Trade Center.

If anybody did, it would be a matter for the courts to decide — and they would undoubtedly say that it is not illegal to build a mosque near the site of the World Trade Center attack.

The intelligentsia and others who are wrapping themselves in the Constitution are fighting a phony war against a straw man. Why create a false issue, except to evade the real issue?

Our betters are telling us that we need to be more "tolerant" and more "sensitive" to the feelings of Muslims. But if we are supposed to be sensitive to Muslims, why are Muslims not supposed to be sensitive to the feelings of millions of Americans, for whom 9/11 was the biggest national trauma since Pearl Harbor?

It would not be illegal for Japanese Americans to build a massive shinto shrine next to Pearl Harbor. But, in all these years, they have never sought to do it.

When Catholic authorities in Poland were planning to build an institution for nuns, years ago, and someone pointed out that it would be near the site of a concentration camp that carried out genocide, the Pope intervened to stop it.

He didn't say that the Catholic Church had a legal right to build there, as it undoubtedly did.

Instead, he respected the painful feelings of other people. And he certainly did not denounce those who called attention to the concentration camp.

There is no question that Muslims have a right to build a mosque where they chose to. The real question is why they chose that particular location, in a country that covers more than 3 million square miles.

If we all did everything that we have a legal right to do, we could not even survive as individuals, much less as a society. So the question is whether those who are planning a Ground Zero mosque want to be part of American society or just to see how much they can get away with in American society?

Can anyone in his right mind believe that this was intended to show solidarity with Americans, rather than solidarity with those who attacked America? Does anyone imagine that the Middle East nations, including Iran, from whom financial contributions will be solicited, want to promote reconciliation between Americans and Muslims?

That the President of the United States has joined the chorus of those calling the Ground Zero mosque a religious freedom issue tells us a lot about the moral dry rot that is undermining this country from within.

In this, as in other things, Barack Obama is not so much the cause of our decline but the culmination of it. He had many predecessors and many contemporaries who represent the same mindset and the same malaise.

There are people for whom moral preening has become a way of life. They are out in force denouncing critics of the Ground Zero mosque.

There are others for whom a citizen of the world affectation puts them one-up on those of us who are grateful to be Americans, and to enjoy a freedom that is all too rare in other countries around the world, even at this late date in human history.

They think the United States is somehow on trial, and needs to prove itself to others by bending over backwards. But bending over backwards does not win friends. It loses respect, including self-respect.

To find out more about Thomas Sowell and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com. Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305. His Web site is www.tsowell.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

8 Comments | Post Comment
Well said Professor Sowell. America is a democracy, that too a model for others to follow. All we can do at this stage is rise support for our view. Let the majority view prevail. But the consequences of that majority decision would have to be borne by all.
Comment: #1
Posted by: k Stephen Daniel
Tue Aug 31, 2010 1:11 AM
"Does anyone imagine that the Middle East nations, including Iran, from whom financial contributions will be solicited, want to promote reconciliation between Americans and Muslims?"

Of course they do. Plenty of Iranians have families in America (Iranian Americans 400,000 in number) and Iran had candlelight vigils on the streets after ethnically SUNNI terrorists did the attack on 9/11.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Prateek Sanjay
Tue Aug 31, 2010 1:29 AM
The United States is a republic, not a democracy. A democracy is two wolves and a lamb deciding what to have for dinner. The Constitution of The United States provides rights, exclusively, for United States citizens. Non-citizens have no "Constitutional rights".
Comment: #3
Posted by: David Henricks
Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:32 AM
Bang on Thomas. Bang on.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Vijay Vikram
Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:11 PM
It really is a case of what they can get away with in the moralising-liberal discourse of the West. I hope to God it isn't built because that would serve as the last nail in the coffin that is the United States of America.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Vijay Vikram
Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:14 PM
Your supposition as to the architects' motivations for the mosque were confirmed a few days back, with the leaking of the design blueprints: http://bit.ly/b25ATq

I lack the modesty to deny that great minds think alike, sir... ;)

-jjg
Comment: #6
Posted by: J. Gravelle
Wed Sep 1, 2010 10:55 AM
About 30 years ago, I and many others in the Presbyterian Church USA began donating money through the Red Crescent Society in Detroit to "Project Loving Care" to aid orphaned and disadvantaged Palestinian children. It seemed to be the Christian thing to do and I received several nice thank you notes for my donations.
However with one of my thank you notes I received a request, on Detroit's Red Crescent Society stationary, for more money to buy weapons to kill Jews. I was shocked since the Red Crescent Society supposedly mirrors the work of The Red Cross and represents the more moderate elements of Islam. I stopped my donations but did not report the incidence to any authorities.
Since this event, which preceded Islamic terrorist acts of the last 25 years, I have been much more cautious about where I donate money and have looked harder at Islam fund raising and teachings. It seems that Islam, much like the KKK and Mafia, hide much of their terrorist type activities behind a religious and charitable facade. Islam is the only world wide religion that condones murder of those that will not convert. If you look in detail at history preceding and following the Crusades you will see that their primary tool for conversions has been military and terrorist in nature.
Islam has very little credability based on what I have learned. Project Loving Care is still active today and even receives donations from the U. S. government. I am sure they do a lot of good for the Muslim community but they are any thing but honest and friendly to the rest of the world.
Comment: #7
Posted by: Edward Western
Thu Sep 2, 2010 5:46 PM
Re: Prateek Sanjay

So I guess you are up to date with Ahmadinejad's and the Ayatollah's rhetoric of destroying the Jewish nation completely off the map? How about the 100s of thousands of people Iran has purged in the name of security and sanctity inside their own country over the last 60 years?
Comment: #8
Posted by: Daniel
Fri Sep 3, 2010 12:08 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Thomas Sowell
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 18 Feb 2012
Oliver North
Oliver NorthUpdated 17 Feb 2012

9 Jun 2009 The Character of Nations

15 May 2007 The Anger Of The Left

5 Mar 2010 Alice in Medical Care: Part IV