creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Thomas Sowell
Thomas Sowell
30 Sep 2014
Random Thoughts

Random thoughts on the passing scene: What a non-judgmental society amounts to is that common decency is … Read More.

23 Sep 2014
Who Wants War?

Some pundits are saying that President Obama has been floundering in his response to the ISIS crisis because … Read More.

16 Sep 2014
Late-Talking Children

Anyone who knows what anxiety, and sometimes anguish, parents go through when they have a child who is still … Read More.

Libya and Lies

Comment

It was a little much when President Barack Obama said that he was "offended" by the suggestion that his administration would try to deceive the public about what happened in Benghazi. What has this man not deceived the public about?

Remember his pledge to cut the deficit in half in his first term in office? This was followed by the first trillion dollar deficit ever, under any President of the United States — followed by trillion dollar deficits in every year of the Obama administration.

Remember his pledge to have a "transparent" government that would post its legislative proposals on the Internet several days before Congress was to vote on them, so that everybody would know what was happening? This was followed by an ObamaCare bill so huge and passed so fast that even members of Congress did not have time to read it.

Remember his claims that previous administrations had arrogantly interfered in the internal affairs of other nations — and then his demands that Israel stop building settlements and give away land outside its 1967 borders, as a precondition to peace talks with the Palestinians, on whom there were no preconditions?

As for what happened in Libya, the Obama administration says that there is an "investigation" under way. An "on-going investigation" sounds so much better than "stonewalling" to get past election day. But you can bet the rent money that this "investigation" will not be completed before election day. And whatever the investigation says after the election will be irrelevant.

The events unfolding in Benghazi on the tragic night of September 11th were being relayed to the State Department as the attacks were going on, "in real time," as they say. So the idea that the Obama administration now has to carry out a time-consuming "investigation" to find out what those events were, when the information was immediately available at the time, is a little much.

The full story of what happened in Libya, down to the last detail, may never be known.

But, as someone once said, you don't need to eat a whole egg to know that it is rotten. And you don't need to know every detail of the events before, during and after the attacks to know that the story put out by the Obama administration was a fraud.

The administration's initial story that what happened in Benghazi began as a protest against an anti-Islamic video in America was a very convenient theory. The most obvious alternative explanation would have been devastating to Barack Obama's much heralded attempts to mollify and pacify Islamic nations in the Middle East.

To have helped overthrow pro-Western governments in Egypt and Libya, only to bring anti-Western Islamic extremists to power would have been revealed as a foreign policy disaster of the first magnitude. To have been celebrating President Obama's supposedly heroic role in the killing of Osama bin Laden, with the implication that Al Qaeda was crippled, would have been revealed as a farce.

Osama bin Laden was by no means the first man to plan a surprise attack on America and later be killed. Japan's Admiral Yamamoto planned the attack on Pearl Harbor that brought the United States into World War II, and he was later tracked down and shot down in a plane that was carrying him.

Nobody tried to depict President Franklin D. Roosevelt as some kind of hero for having simply authorized the killing of Yamamoto. In that case, the only hero who was publicized was the man who shot down the plane that Yamamoto was in.

Yet the killing of Osama bin Laden has been depicted as some kind of act of courage by President Obama. After bin Laden was located, why would any President not give the go-ahead to get him?

That took no courage at all. It would have been far more dangerous politically for Obama not to have given the go-ahead. Moreover, Obama hedged his bets by authorizing the admiral in charge of the operation to proceed only under various conditions.

This meant that success would be credited to Obama and failure could be blamed on the admiral — who would join George W. Bush, Hillary Clinton and other scapegoats for Obama's failures.

Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305. His website is www.tsowell.com. To find out more about Thomas Sowell and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM



Comments

9 Comments | Post Comment
You hit it! Good job sir!
Comment: #1
Posted by: bonzo
Tue Oct 23, 2012 5:14 PM
Another broken promise from Oh-that-can-wait.

Roland Martin: If you are elected what is the very first thing that you focus on as Commander in Chief of this country?

Barack Obama: Well, we will call in the Joint Chiefs of Staff. I will give them a new assignment and that is to bring our troops HOME (emphasis mine) in a careful, responsible way,..."

The troops did not come home. They are in Kuwait, just over the border from Iraq.
Comment: #2
Posted by: David Henricks
Tue Oct 23, 2012 6:11 PM
Thank you again Prof Sowell----The truth shines like a beakon in a storm---GOD BLESS YOU-------KEEP YOU AND YOURS------SEMPER FI------John L---ECHO 2/1 WPNS---1st MAR DIV----
Comment: #3
Posted by: John L Knox
Tue Oct 23, 2012 7:09 PM
The Yamamoto analogy is spot on. I've enjoyed your books and columns for years Dr. Sowell. Best wishes to you and your family.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Jarrod Thomas
Wed Oct 24, 2012 6:51 AM
First I've heard of you a friend od mine let me know who you are, I thank him now, and you Sir.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Chappy doyle
Thu Oct 25, 2012 10:46 PM
To the honorable Thomas Sowell,
Thank you for the "Libya and Lies" article. Well crafted. I have read of you over the years, unfortunately it was lightly, and now I think I should spend more time viewing your thoughts. I appreciate a mans views on life not based on race but on beliefs. I grew up in white Montana yet I have never had the time, nor energy, to hate a whole race of people, my father taught me young that you judge one on what they do and not what they are. From what I have read that you have said, how do you view and deal those that think you are turning you back on your race. I have many freinds that don't think much of hispanics or blacks, and while I don't think much of their racial beliefs I think deep down they are good folk. Do you try to change their beliefs or just accept they for what they are?
Craig A. Moore
craigermt@aol.com
Just so you know, I always leave my name and eddress. Leaving a message without a come-back capability is a sign of cowardace.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Craig A. Moore
Sun Oct 28, 2012 2:17 PM
To the honorable Thomas Sowell,
Thank you for the "Libya and Lies" article. Well crafted. I have read of you over the years, unfortunately it was lightly, and now I think I should spend more time viewing your thoughts. I appreciate a mans views on life not based on race but on beliefs. I grew up in white Montana yet I have never had the time, nor energy, to hate a whole race of people, my father taught me young that you judge one on what they do and not what they are. From what I have read that you have said, how do you view and deal those that think you are turning you back on your race. I have many freinds that don't think much of hispanics or blacks, and while I don't think much of their racial beliefs I think deep down they are good folk. Do you try to change their beliefs or just accept they for what they are?
Craig A. Moore
craigermt@aol.com
Just so you know, I always leave my name and eddress. Leaving a message without a come-back capability is a sign of cowardace.
Comment: #7
Posted by: Craig A. Moore
Sun Oct 28, 2012 2:30 PM
Professor Sowell, thank you so much for your "spot on" analysis and remarkable insight. I thoroughly enjoying reading your articles and find them both refreshing and enlightening.
Thanks for always "fighting the fight" and bringing to light the truly important issues of our time.
I salute you sir and want to thank you for all you have done and continue to do for our beloved nation.
Well done Marine!
Semper Fidelis,
Frank E. Pulley
Sergeant Major
United States Marine Corps (Retired)
Comment: #8
Posted by: SgtMaj (Ret.) Frank Pulley
Mon Oct 29, 2012 9:31 PM
My email address is - fepulley@aol.com

Thank you!

Frank E. Pulley
SgtMaj USMC (Ret.)
Comment: #9
Posted by: SgtMaj (Ret.) Frank Pulley
Mon Oct 29, 2012 9:45 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Thomas Sowell
Sep. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Walter Williams
Walter E. WilliamsUpdated 1 Oct 2014
Patrick Buchanan
Pat BuchananUpdated 30 Sep 2014
William Murchison
William MurchisonUpdated 30 Sep 2014

23 May 2007 The Amnesty Fraud: Part III

15 Dec 2009 Christmas Books

20 Mar 2012 Race and Rhetoric