Conservative> Thomas Sowell> Care Versus Control

	14 May 2013 Looking Back -- and Forward A hundred years ago, anyone who might have predicted in 1913 the monumental, man-made catastrophes that would … Read More.
	14 May 2013 Lies About Libya There can be honest differences of opinion on many subjects. But there can also be dishonest differences. … Read More.
	7 May 2013 Bouncing Ball Politics If you are driving along and suddenly see a big red rubber ball come bouncing out into the street, you might … Read More.

Care Versus Control

As someone who was once rushed to a hospital in the middle of the night, because of taking a medication that millions of people take every day without the slightest problem, I have a special horror of life and death medical decisions being made by bureaucrats in Washington, about patients they have never laid eyes on.

On another occasion, I was told by a doctor that I would have died if I had not gotten to him in time, after an allergic reaction to eating one of the most healthful foods around. On still another occasion, I was treated with a medication that causes many people big problems and was urged to come back to the hospital immediately if I had a really bad reaction. But I had no reaction at all, went home, felt fine and slept soundly through the night.

My point is that everybody is different. Millions of children eat peanut butter sandwiches every day but some children can die from eating peanut butter. Some vaccines and medications that save many lives can also kill some people.

Are decisions made by doctors who have treated the same patient for years to be over-ruled by bureaucrats sitting in front of computer screens in Washington, following guidelines drawn up with the idea of "bringing down the cost of medical care"?

The idea is even more absurd than the idea that you can add millions of people to a government medical care plan without increasing the costs. It is also more dangerous.

What is both dangerous and mindless is rushing a massive new medical care scheme through Congress so fast that members of Congress do not even have time to read it before voting on it. Legislation that is far less sweeping in its effects can get months of hearings before Congressional committees, followed by debates in the Senate and the House of Representatives, with all sorts of people voicing their views in the media and in letters to Congress, while ads from people on both sides of the issue appear in newspapers and on television.

If this new medical scheme is so wonderful, why can't it stand the light of day or a little time to think about it?

The obvious answer is that the administration doesn't want us to know what it is all about or else we would not go along with it.

Far better to say that we can't wait, that things are just too urgent. This tactic worked with whizzing the "stimulus" package through Congress, even though the stimulus package itself has not worked.

Any serious discussion of government-run medical care would have to look at other countries where there is government-run medical care. As someone who has done some research on this for my book "Applied Economics," I can tell you that the actual consequences of government-controlled medical care is not a pretty picture, however inspiring the rhetoric that accompanies it.

Thirty thousand Canadians are passing up free medical care at home to go to some other country where they have to pay for it. People don't do that without a reason.

But Canadians are better off than people in some other countries with government-controlled medical care, because they have the United States right next door, in case their medical problems get too serious to rely on their own system.

But where are Americans to turn if we become like Canada? Where are we to go when we need better medical treatment than Washington bureaucrats will let us have? Mexico? The Caribbean?

Many people do not understand that it is not just a question of whether government bureaucrats will agree to pay for particular medical treatments. The same government-control mindset that decides what should and should not be paid for can also decide that the medical technology or pharmaceutical drugs that they control should not be for sale to those who are willing to pay their own money.

Right now, medications or treatments that have not been approved by the Food and Drug Administration are medications or treatments that you are not allowed to buy with your own money, no matter how desperate your medical condition, and no matter how many years these medications or treatments may have been used without dire effects in other countries.

The crucial word is not "care" but "control."

To find out more about Thomas Sowell and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com. Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305. His Web site is www.tsowell.com.

Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment

Dear Thomas Sowell, Thank you for your article "Major Differences between care and control!" Politicians continue for more power and more greed and this is why the 1018 pages of the latest Healthcare because they didn't think anyone would read it "line by line" (since they don't read it and won't) to see where all the pork would be going and into which deep pockets! Of course, you remember, as Obama promised he would do to CUT endless money pits and programs that's not working! This, of course, had to be his biggest joke (other than the one he keeps talking about "I took on Bushs' debts, without regard to the 70's when all the 'tax & spend' programs started spiraling out of control.") Obama, and his administration, has no intention of doing anything but to finish bankrupting America! His first few days in office showed that he would do whatever it took to be in power!

Politicians calling 'social, welfare, healthcare programs' are for ‘our children's future!' Politicians think if they throw enough money down the drain, they'll build character, morals, integrity, and respect'! ‘Ain't gonna happen!'
Doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out public schools, social and welfare problems aren't working! Never have! Never will! They're just another 'endless money pit' and a way for them to get elected by people who live off the system! So you see, there has to be many reasons these politicians 'have to be elected'! 'POWER AND GREED!'

Politicians have far too much time on their hands! I wonder how many could own their own company (using their money, blood, sweat and tears) or work in the private sector and earn a living? Taxpayers know it would be less than 3% and the other 97% would be fired, as In the business world, if you made the decisions politicians make that's bankrupted America, law enforcement would come and walk you out the door in shackles! herefore, isn't it time for layoffs and cuts in government and the political world.

After Nafta, Cafta, Freddie, Fannie, AIG, CIT, Banks, Insurance companies, Automakers, social and welfare programs, Politicians have made a mockery of the business world. What an insult to the business world, working and struggling to make ends meet while the politicians conduct useless meeting after meeting trying to take control, gain more power and more greed. Millions of Taxpayer dollars could be saved by not having to pay for the building you're occupying!

As for the 'care, control, power and greed' that several of the politicians, as couple weeks ago, were asking for and that they be granted immediately, are the first ones that should be sold the one-way ticket to GITMO, after seizing their assets to pay off the trillions they've borrowed without Taxpayers consent, and taking local, state, federal prisoners, social and welfare recipients with them so they can lie and steal from each other!

It's time for ‘Fair Tax', to include property taxes, and ‘Voting Laws' to change!

Comment: #1
Posted by: Shirley deLong
Sun Aug 9, 2009 10:52 AM