creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Thomas Sowell
Thomas Sowell
14 Feb 2012
The Progressive Legacy: Part II

"Often wrong but never in doubt" is a phrase that summarizes much of what was done by Presidents … Read More.

14 Feb 2012
The 'Progressive' Legacy

Although Barack Obama is the first black President of the United States, he is by no means unique, except for … Read More.

14 Feb 2012
The Progressive Legacy: Part III

The same presumptions of superior wisdom and virtue behind the interventionism of Progressive Presidents … Read More.

A Letter from a Child

Share Comment

Recent videos of American children in school singing songs of praise for Barack Obama were a little much, especially for those of us old enough to remember pictures of children singing the praises of dictators like Hitler, Stalin and Mao.

But you don't need a dictator to make you feel queasy about the manipulation of children. The mindset that sees children in school as an opportunity for teachers to impose their own notions, instead of developing the child's ability to think for himself or herself, is a dangerous distortion of education.

Parents send their children to school to acquire the knowledge that has come down to us as a legacy of our culture— whether it is mathematics, science, or whatever— so that those children can grow up and go out into the world equipped to face life's challenges.

Too many "educators" see teaching not as a responsibility to the students but as an opportunity for themselves— whether to indoctrinate a captive audience with the teacher's ideology, manipulate them in social experiments or just do fun things that make teaching easier, whether or not it really educates the child.

You can, of course, call anything that happens in a classroom "education"— but that does not make it education, except in the eyes of those who cannot think beyond words. Unfortunately, the dumbed-down education of previous generations means that many parents today see nothing wrong with their children being manipulated in school, instead of being educated.

Such parents may see nothing wrong with spending precious time in classrooms chit-chatting about how everyone "feels" about things on television or in their personal life.

But while our children are frittering away time on trivia, other children in other countries are acquiring the skills in math, science or other fields that will allow them to take the jobs our children will meed when they grow up. Foreigners can take those jobs either by coming to America and outperforming Americans or by having those jobs outsourced to them overseas.

In short, schools are supposed to prepare children for the future, not give teachers opportunities for self-indulgences in the present.

One of these self-indulgences was exemplified by a letter I received recently from a fifth-grader in the Sayre Elementary School in Lyon, Michigan.

He said, "I have been assigned to ask a famous person a question about how he or she would solve a difficult problem." The problem was what to do about the economy.

Instead, I replied to his parents: With American students consistently scoring near or at the bottom in international tests, I am repeatedly appalled by teachers who waste their students' time by assigning them to write to strangers, chosen only because those strangers' names have appeared in the media.

It is of course much easier— and more "exciting," to use a word too many educators use— to do cute little stuff like this than to take on the sober responsibility to develop in students both the knowledge and the ability to think that will enable them to form their own views on matters in both public and private life. What earthly good would it do your son to know what economic policies I think should be followed, especially since what I think should be done will not have the slightest effect on what the government will in fact do? And why should a fifth-grader be expected to deal with such questions that people with Ph.D.'s in economics have trouble wrestling with?

The damage does not end with wasting students' time and misdirecting their energies, serious though these things are. Getting students used to looking to so-called "famous" people for answers is the antithesis of education as a preparation for making up one's own mind as citizens of a democracy, rather than as followers of "leaders."

Nearly two hundred years ago, the great economist David Ricardo said: "I wish that I may never think the smiles of the great and powerful a sufficient inducement to turn aside from the straight path of honesty and the convictions of my own mind."

The fad of assigning students to write to strangers is an irresponsible self-indulgence of teachers who should be teaching. But that practice will not end until enough parents complain to enough principals and enough elected officials to make it end.

To find out more about Thomas Sowell and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com. Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305. His Web site is www.tsowell.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS.COM


Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
I suspect that all education is biased. What is needed is a bias in favor of those values outlined in our founding father's documents and a commitment, above all things, to teaching the truth. If nothing other than the fact that truth is not relative, and that man cannot survive in civilization without a fundamental code of moral decency toward all (because of the special dignity [hence responsibility] of man, endowed upon us by our Creator) is taught, then we shall be far ahead of the indoctro-pablum that poses as education today.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Don L
Tue Oct 6, 2009 12:25 AM
Re: Don L. Amen. But try explaining that to anyone who is a public educator by profession, and they go nuts. They'll make all kinds of excuses as to why the schools "can't" be doing a better job (usually they blame regulation or a diverse student body or lack of money), yet somehow the US, despite having every possible advantage, still cannot educate its students properly.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Matt
Tue Oct 6, 2009 2:31 AM
When I first saw the video, my thoughts were 'Why aren't they teaching instead of amusing the kiddies?". Such an activity (singing, nursery rhymes) might have been appropriate for a Kindergarten class, but these children were not Kindergarteners. Like Dr. Sowell, I DETEST the word "educator" . There are a lot of teachers in my family (husband, mother and two daughters)-- not an educator among them
We sang in grammar school--patriotic songs, old classics like Santa Lucia, Juanita. but it was before school. They probably did it to ease the pain of those endless math exercises in third grade--multiplying 3 digit numbers by 3 digit numbers without a calculator in site.
I agree that parents have been dumbed down. When in a college chemistry class (circa 1978), my sons were befuddled by a problem which could have been solved by using logarithms. I was surprised, appalled to find out that neither of them had been exposed to logarithms even though one had been in a so called "advanced math" class in high school. When I complained to the school (Catholic) I was told that the teachers felt that the concept of logarithms would have stressed the students too much. The other parents were perfectly happy with that.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Anne Daigle
Tue Oct 6, 2009 12:46 PM
Dear Thomas Sowell, Your article is good and brings to mind wnat all Taxpayers are thinking and know the public schools should be eliminated, as they're nothing more than money pits! Let's take, forty plus years ago, when there were 35-40 kids in each classroom, with one (1) teacher, (1) principal, and a paddle with holes in it and everyone understood what that meant. Since government took control, stating you can no longer paddle the mean, unruly,or misbehaved as it will hurt their 'thinking' which is nothing more than a crock! Politicians actually want you to believe this hype! The only hurt the paddling caused, when I was in school, was your pride and when you got home, you received additional punishment! Politicians want you to think this so they can 'save their stance in government' to go on creating more and more illegitimates to create more and more 'terror' on American soil so Taxpayers won't know what they doing with all the money they're taking for building all these fancy schools and jails in hopes that you'll re-elect them! If these people want 'ONE ON ONE EDUCATION', then they need to get off their duffs and start home schooling their own kids or put them in a good Christian School, as this is the ONLY way they'll get an education in todays' world run by politicians! As for the mean, unruly and misbehaved kids today, Taxpayers need to make sure all these 'stay-at-home-illegitimate moms' with 2 plus kids, living off social and welfare programs, come to an end! It's a proven fact, kids born in this type environment will never go to school, will do drugs, steal, rape, maim, or murder as this is 'their way of life!'
Folks, this isn't about race, democrat or republican, it's about doing the right thing for children and future generations. Since Taxpayers are the ones paying for themselves and their families, politicians should not have a say in this matter! Even the Obamas would not have their girls in public schools, why should Taxpayers? This should tell you something about how the politicians think- " DO AS I SAY, NOT AS I DO!"
THERE'S AN OLD SAYING 'IF YOU DON'T WORK, YOU DON'T EAT - JUST THAT SIMPLE!'

WHY WOULD THE 'DUMBEST MAN ON THE STREET' ALREADY KNOW THIS, AND SOMEONE THAT GRADUATED FROM THE FINEST COLLEGE, WOULDN'T? DOESN'T TAKE A ROCKET SCIENTIST TO FIGURE THIS OUT, NOW DOES IT???????
Comment: #4
Posted by: Shirley deLong
Sun Oct 11, 2009 9:08 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Thomas Sowell
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Brent Bozell
L. Brent BozellUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Joseph Farah
Joseph FarahUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Terence Jeffrey
Terence JeffreyUpdated 15 Feb 2012

25 Mar 2008 The Audacity of Rhetoric

28 Sep 2010 Random Thoughts

17 Jun 2008 Is Prestige Worth It?