creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Suzanne Fields
Suzanne Fields
11 Apr 2014
At Last, the Season of Hope

The brutal winter ebbs at last, giving way to the season of hope, deliverance and renewal. The celebrations … Read More.

4 Apr 2014
How 'Noah' and Life Imitate Art

This isn't the Sunday school epic, but it asks the right questions. "Noah," the movie, is sometimes described … Read More.

28 Mar 2014
The Peril of Over-Protecting our Children

Beware the trends in child rearing. Newton might revise his second law of thermodynamics: In every theory of what'… Read More.

Fleeing From Fatherhood

Comment

You don't have to be an elderly Aunt Agatha to remember when feminism was about equal rights and equal pay. In those heady days of righteousness unbound, not all women cheered the revolution, but most did. Our mothers and grandmothers who enjoyed the freedom of being full-time moms, home for the kids after school, nevertheless believed that pay scales deprived women of what was rightly theirs.

But soon women of the generation of stay-at-home moms felt the sting of condescension, targets of the pioneering women they first cheered. They had become the enemy in a new war, women vs. women. The mommies lost that war, and their daughters went on to full-time careers. Today, women are the majority sex in college and graduate school, including the schools of law and medicine.

The sexual revolution brought freedom — and privilege — to women that an earlier generation never dreamed of. Alas, like most revolutions, the feminist revolution, for all of its earnest and idealistic beginnings, has been blighted by unintended consequences. A new class of victim, the single mom, has been abandoned by men to raise children alone. Not so long ago, a man who fathered a child with a woman he wouldn't (or couldn't) marry suffered stigma and reproach, perhaps from men more than women. That was before "illegitimacy" became the "new normal." Now, more than half of babies born to mothers under 30 are born outside marriage. The trend accelerates.

These single moms are not the college-educated career women who have climbed the ladder of rank and prosperity. "Marriage has become a luxury good," sociologist Frank Furstenberg of the University of Pennsylvania tells The New York Times. Fully 90 percent of college-educated women who become mothers are married. They discovered something besides book learning behind the ivy-covered walls. The big losers are women without the advantages of prosperity. The racial breakdown of unwed mothers is stark and dramatic: 73 percent of black children, 53 percent of Latino children and 29 percent of white children are born to single mothers.

These are more than statistics. Any of us can recite the litany of disadvantages inherited by children raised without fathers. They are more likely to experience poverty, to do poorly in school, to wind up on the wrong side of the law and to repeat the grim cycle in their own generation.

Few in Washington discuss this because it's first a cultural problem, and Washington only wants to talk about problems that can be reduced to politics.

Culture doesn't fit comfortably into political solutions. When Bill Clinton was president and reluctantly supported welfare reform, welfare was widely thought to encourage illegitimacy. The government played Big Daddy and picked up the check. Many women who had lived on welfare learned that getting off the dole and finding work felt good. They found work but not daddies for their babies. The revolution freed women to take charge of their lives, and men were happy to get out of their way.

What's being ignored in the controversy over government-mandated contraceptive coverage is the way men have abandoned their responsibility to share responsibility for birth control. There's no one in the debate to say this. Neither Mitt Romney nor Newt Gingrich is eager to join the debate, and Rick Santorum only dreams of the day when contraception will be forbidden. The celibate bishops in their gowns have more to say about sexual responsibility than the men who have rendered themselves irrelevant.

It's a little cheeky of feminists to mount high horses to object to the rudeness of being called "sluts," it seems to me, since they've organized "Slut Walks" to assert their right to dress like hookers without suffering the leers of men. The idea was to deprive the word of its sting, in the way that gays have tried to deprive the word "queer" of its power to wound. It hasn't quite worked. The dissembling of Sandra Fluke, who brought Rush Limbaugh low, is easy to see through, too; she knows very well that college-educated women do not depend on government mandates to pay for their birth control. Women are no longer the second sex.

The birth control controversy has been cast as political — Republican vs. Democrat, conservative vs. liberal — when it's clearly about whether the religious folk can be required by the government to pay for something offensive to their faith.

It's also about the fundamental change in the male-female relationship. As women gained equality with men, men lost their identity as provider and protector. If marriage was once required as a sexual-economic compromise that domesticated men for family life, it is no longer. Men have fled fatherhood as well as the responsibility for preventing unwanted fatherhood. Man has been unmanned.

Write to Suzanne Fields at: sfields1000@aol.com. To find out more about Suzanne Fields and read her past columns, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM



Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
Some very interesting point I never thought of. Very good.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Thu Mar 15, 2012 11:28 AM
So it's mostly men's fault for single family mothers? No!

Men would probably have always fled fatherhood unless there was familial and societal pressure not to. You need to read some evolutionally biology regarding sexual behavior and child rearing.

Is it men's fault that young women of today are so promiscuous. I'm 63. It was not like that when I was young.

The difference now is that there are a multitude of government programs to ensure that children do not die.

There programs do not ensure they flourish and develop, just stay alive.

The government has taken away man's God given right to let his children starve to death.

Why should young men be full fathers if the government will feed and provide medical care for their children.

Perhaps if these single mothers were faced with their children starving or dying of sickness their behavior would be moderated. At least no second, third, fourth … bastards all from different fathers.

Percentage of bastards: Black 73%; Latino 53%; White 29%. When will Black and Latino leaders man up on this issue. Probably never, as it is not in their financial and leadership interest to tell the constituents how very flawed they are..

White people can't address this issue because if it is they are “racist”. Look what Blacks did to Bill Cosby. Where is Al Sharpton on this issue? Oh right, criticizing Black single mothers does not go with is victimhood mantra.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Tom Toth
Mon Mar 19, 2012 11:22 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Suzanne Fields
Apr. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
30 31 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Ben Carson
Ben CarsonUpdated 16 Apr 2014
Brent Bozell
Walter Williams
Walter E. WilliamsUpdated 16 Apr 2014

21 Nov 2008 Lessons From the Vampire

4 May 2012 Currency for the 21st Century

8 Nov 2013 The Barrier Between the Geeks and the Suits