Conservative> R Emmett Tyrrell> The Exhibitionist At The State Department

	24 May 2012 The Great Debate WASHINGTON — Here I am on the campaign trail, frenetically promoting my book, "The Death of Liberalism.… Read More.
	17 May 2012 CNN Plays Dirty Too WASHINGTON — I first heard it two, perhaps two and a half years ago. A sage sitting in his New York … Read More.
	10 May 2012 Conrad Black's Example WASHINGTON — Conrad Black is back in Canada. He controlled the third-largest string of English-language … Read More.

The Exhibitionist at the State Department

WASHINGTON — I have been following Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton's first foreign policy jaunt with my customary discernment in matters regarding the Clintons. Frankly, I am very uncomfortable with her title, secretary of state. She termed her Asian trip a "listening tour." Does that bring back memories? She met with foreign leaders, but she commanded more attention for meeting with "giggly" students on a campus and appearing on an Indonesian variety show called "Awesome." There she discoursed on the pop culture of teenagers but demurred when asked to sing. She mugged for the paparazzi, glad-handed crowds and explained her informality as "a way that is not traditional, not confined by the ministerial greeting and the staged handshake photo."

So after watching this trivialization of statecraft, I shall continue to think of the former senator from New York not as Secretary of State Clinton but as candidate Clinton. Not surprisingly, candidate Clinton has brought to the State Department the most politically seasoned staff ever. As she campaigned in Asia, she was accompanied by at least two of her longtime political operatives. One is Huma Abedin, from candidate Clinton's days on the Hill. Abedin carries the title "senior adviser." What she knows about foreign policy remains a mystery, but she knows the Clinton political operation. On this trip, according to The Washington Post, Abedin "silently will hand Clinton a glass of water when her voice rasps during a briefing." Another veteran Clintonista on the trip has been Kiki McLean, a former press aide to Bill Clinton in his days as governor.

There are more Clintonistas joining candidate Clinton at the State Department, which suggests there will be friction ahead between her political operatives and diplomats and foreign policy specialists, who are supposed to be untainted by politics. Candidate Clinton is bringing as her chief of staff Cheryl Mills, the Clinton loyalist who, as a White House lawyer in 1999, spoke ardently on the House floor against the Boy President's impeachment. Philippe Reines, press secretary for Hillary on the Hill, will play that role at State. The candidate also is bringing along Lissa Muscatine, her speechwriter from yesteryear, and scheduler Lona Valmoro. Even the Clintons' old aide Maggie Williams is working for Hillary, though perhaps not this week.

Socks, the White House cat when the Clintons were in office, passed away this week. As was the case with the Clintons' famous dog, Buddy, the expiry took place while the Clintons were on the road. Doubtless, it is only a matter of time before the Clintons' loyal factotum Sidney Blumenthal moves into a State Department office and talk of conspiracies against the candidate begins. How about a "vast State Department conspiracy"?

Another reason it is difficult for me to take Hillary seriously as the nation's top diplomat is that she is bringing to this high Cabinet post the incongruous girlishness that she always brings to public life. There is nothing new about a female secretary of state. The post has been held by Madeleine Albright and Condoleezza Rice. Neither displayed a hint of girlishness. Neither continued Hillary's adolescent competition of the boys against the girls.

In Asia, candidate Clinton, according to The New York Times, answered questions from a "giggly" Korean girl about "how she knew she had fallen in love with her husband." As aforementioned, she talked in Indonesia about her love of rock 'n' roll, The Beatles and the Rolling Stones. (She is 61 years old and apparently locked in a time warp, with no development in her musical taste for 40 years.) In Tokyo, the Times reports, a "nervous young woman" asked candidate Clinton how she might "become as strong as (candidate Clinton) was." Hillary responded, "Well, I played a lot of baseball, and I played with a lot of boys." Can you imagine Secretary of State Henry Kissinger — say, while dealing with China — being asked how he knew he had fallen in love with his beautiful wife, Nancy? Can you imagine Secretary Kissinger explaining the strength of his personality by telling a Japanese youth, "Well, I played a lot of baseball, and I played with a lot of girls"?

Throughout her public life, Hillary Clinton has proved to be a formidable figure, but that's not because of her intelligence and certainly not because of her high moral character. She has been propelled to the heights of public life because she is an exhibitionist. Many of our public figures are. There is very little in their lives that is too personal for them to publicize and to exploit in seeking attention. This is one of the reasons our public leaders are so mediocre. They are celebrities.

R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr. is founder and editor-in-chief of The American Spectator and an adjunct scholar at the Hudson Institute. To find out more about R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr. and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment

Obama's Tuesday movie was same hype, different day! Nothing mentioned and
most important "cutting their own salaries and retirements" as this is only
way to pull United States out of recession! It looks like 'all the king's horses and all the king's men' will never put America back together again! They have no concept of what's going on in the real world!
Hillary Clinton is nothing more than another 'mouthpiece' that will help drag America further into bankruptcy.

It's a proven fact that the only way to protect America's future is by creating stable jobs in the
private sector and not bigger government. The 'Haste' for Obama and his party with
this Stimulus shows lack of experience, no thought, as usual, given to the future of America,
let alone creating jobs that will be the 'HeartBeat of America', which is textile and furniture
manufacturing. As I've stated before, No Infrastructures needed if America has no stable job
market, which is obvious, there is no stabililty in America and hasn't been since 1977! Where
have you been? If Obama and his party think that they're re-building the housing market and
the damage done by Freddie, Fannie, AIG, Big 3, or anyone else taking Taxpayers money
they're not entitled to, think again! When people got to borrow four to five times and
approximately sixty (60%) percent more than the house would ever be worth, there's
absolutely no way to 'bailout the housing markets!' What needs to happen is close down
Freddie, Fannie, AIG, BIG 3, and politicians that were on the take! Then, send all politicians,
with just clothes on their backs, that were in on this 'shaft to American people, to Guantanamo,
with no return to America. Take all assets, put them into Trust Funds, and figure out how to
pay back the trillions owed to foreign countries, before we can't pay the interest! Taxpayers
feel that Obama and his tax and spenders are only interested in their own salaries, retirements,
social and welfare programs, which are a real problem, creating more and more terrorists on
American soil! If they were really interested in America, wouldn't they be 'trying to save'
instead of 'spend, spend, spend?' Politicians are going around the issues, worse now than ever
before! Daily, there's more spending on housing, social and welfare programs called "Too
many Illegitimates born to single women, by several different men, and they surely have not
nor will be "trained or disciplined" at home. "It's a way of life" and the more kids they have the
more Taxpayer's monies they collect, therefore, these people shouldn't be entitled to insurance,
housing,doctors,medical, schools, etc. If they don't work they're not doing anything
constructive for America and shouldn't be compensated! It is imperative that America get back
on track, as we're running out of time! It's time to take a long, hard look at what's happening,
instead of ‘creating' more useless programs using Taxpayers money that hasn't worked and
never will. It's only creating more and more terrorism in America! While I'm on a roll I would
like to point something out and I quote "Obama stated that he'd inherited a very bad economy
from George Bush and his administration!" I hate to be the one to burst his bubble and bring
him down, but the 'bad economy,' was created in 1977 by one of his own party!

Comment: #1
Posted by: Shirley deLong
Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:36 AM