creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
R. Emmett Tyrrell
R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr.
24 Jul 2014
In the Middle East, a New Alignment Being Born?

WASHINGTON — It did not take all that long, when you think about it, for America's Nobel Prize-winning … Read More.

17 Jul 2014
The Playboy Presidents

WASHINGTON — I have been vindicated! For years I have been comparing the Clinton family to the family … Read More.

10 Jul 2014
What the Obituarists Never Said About Dick Scaife

WASHINGTON — On the day after his 82nd birthday, on Independence Day to be precise, a giant passed away,… Read More.

Don't Fear! The War on Terror Is Won

Comment

WASHINGTON — Students of intelligence-gathering will tell you that deception and outright lying are essential to the art. Having now reviewed the controversy over who in Congress knew what about the CIA's use of enhanced interrogation techniques, I have concluded that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi might make a superb intelligence officer. She claims that she was utterly unaware of the CIA's rough treatment of terrorists detained after 9/11. She says this without betraying a hint of deception or uncertainty. Well done, well done.

Yet a really good liar does not lie about something easily refuted. In the case of the Hon. Pelosi's protests of ignorance, there are no fewer than three public sources out there refuting her. One is a 2007 Washington Post report that she was included in a "bipartisan group" from the Hill that was fully apprised of these interrogation techniques in September 2002. Another refutation comes from former CIA Director George Tenet's memoirs, "At the Center of the Storm," in which Tenet is pretty open about how rough treatment cracked 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who boasts of beheading journalist Danny Pearl. Tenet also adds that he briefed "senior congressional leaders," presumably among them the Hon. Pelosi, about another of her present concerns, namely, warrantless wiretaps. Then there is this revelation by former CIA Director and former Rep. Porter Goss in The Washington Post this past weekend: "Today, I am slack-jawed to read that members (of Congress) claim to have not understood that the techniques on which they were briefed were to actually be employed; or that specific techniques such as 'waterboarding' were never mentioned." So maybe the speaker of the House would not be a very good spy.

If there is any good news to come from the Obama administration's release of CIA documents relating to the detention and interrogation of post-9/11 detainees, it is that Washington's post-9/11 fears of further terrorist attacks against America have abated. It is official that the Obama administration no longer uses the term "global war on terror." So maybe the war is over and we all can relax.

Yet there is no question that the release of these documents and the ongoing debate over whether to prosecute government functionaries involved in the Bush administration's treatment of terrorists has hurt our intelligence community, both at home and abroad.

Intelligence officers within our service have been intimidated by our own government. Foreign intelligence officers who have been sharing intelligence with us abroad are going to be much less forthcoming. It is a good thing that the administration has determined that America is now secure from terrorist threats.

This is not the first time liberal politicians have put the clamps on our intelligence services' ability to protect the country. In 1975, the Church Committee investigated both the CIA and the FBI, with the consequence that congressional oversight committees were set up, which, in the aftermath of 9/11, were accused of inhibiting our intelligence services from pursuing al-Qaida aggressively in the 1990s. Now, apparently, with the war on terror won, we can go back to those blissful days.

Yet frankly, I am uneasy about this new climate here in Washington. Historically, intelligence documents have been kept from the public eye, not only here but also throughout the Western world. The idea is that we do not want our enemies to be informed of what we know. In David Reynolds' stupendous book ("In Command of History") on how Winston Churchill wrote his World War II memoirs, Reynolds shows over and again Churchill and his opponents in the Labour government cooperating to keep British secrets from the public. British intelligence techniques, in particular, were not divulged. That President Obama's administration, in the first 100 days of its existence, would expose the intelligence techniques used by his predecessor strikes me as reckless. Yet, on the other hand, the global war on terror is over, so maybe everything is going to be OK. I do, however, wonder how President Barack Obama managed to win the war so quickly. Was it just a matter of retiring the hellish Bush from the White House, or is there more to it?

R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr. is the founder and editor-in-chief of The American Spectator and an adjunct scholar at the Hudson Institute. To find out more about R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr. and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.



Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
how did madame fee fee get the job what did the clintons have on obama to get the job they are the most corrupt of any one i don't get it
Comment: #1
Posted by: susan bisceglia
Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:21 AM
I don't understand how the WAR ON TERROR is 'WON', when the WAR in IRAQ, was LOST. Remember? The SURGE didn't work, and the WAR IS LOST. The Taleebon are on the move, NUCLEAR Pakistan is IMPLODING, their NUKE BOY-KHAN-is back to spreading the Nuke Tech wealth, around, CHINA is BUILDING their ARMED FORCES UP, as we build ours DOWN, and President In Over His Head, is ENCHANTED. He kisses our ENEMIES, and flips off our 'FRIENDS'. He's made stopping another Terror Attack, on our soil, ILLEGAL, and he thinks that, any kind of MISSILE DEFENCE is just a waste of money. We are totally SCREWED.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Timothy L. Pennell
Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:58 AM
Sir;...What do you know about really good liars??? I can't bear to be around liars long enough to get to know them...The ones in government and word twisters in journalism I attack at every opportunity...I understand something: The truth is impossible... The truth is a form of fiction, because no matter how hard anyone tries to tell the truth they cannot know it, or tell it... A lie is something anyone can tell, and in doing so, they rob something essential to every relationship, and every democracy; and that is trust.... Communication is truth; an attempt, an approximation, a goal, a necessity is truth... Those who poison that pool are robbing the essential wealth of any society, and turning it to their benefit...So lies and liars should be attacked, and so should torture, and torturers... We should understand that many people, choosing their own benefit and success over the welfare and honor of this country countenanced torture and lies about it... They should all be washed out with a hose... Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #3
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:59 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr.
Jul. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Deb Saunders
Debra J. SaundersUpdated 27 Jul 2014
Lawrence Kudlow
Lawrence KudlowUpdated 26 Jul 2014
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 26 Jul 2014

15 Apr 2010 Liberal vs. Conservative: A Difference in Species

16 Jul 2009 Consequences of the Liberals' Death Wish

14 Mar 2013 Senator Rand Paul Comes of Age