creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Patrick Buchanan
Pat Buchanan
17 Feb 2012
The New Blacklist

My days as a political analyst at MSNBC have come to an end. After 10 enjoyable years, I am departing, after … Read More.

14 Feb 2012
On to Tehran -- or Is It Damascus?

Our War Party has been temporarily diverted from its clamor for war on Iran by the insurrection against the … Read More.

10 Feb 2012
Obama's Trampling on God's Turf Now

Yes, Virginia, there is a religious war going on. It is for the soul of America. And traditional Christianity … Read More.

The Mosque at Ground Zero

Share Comment

The Mosque at Ground Zero

Mayor Michael Bloomberg has just demonstrated that you can become a billionaire in America many times over, while being clueless about the country you live in.

To Bloomberg, if you oppose a mosque two blocks from Ground Zero, you are indulging in religious bigotry and do not understand the Constitution. Here is the mayor explaining how the heroes of 9/11 died so that mosques might be built anywhere in New York City.

"On Sept. 11th, thousands of first responders heroically rushed to the scene and saved tens of thousands of lives. More than 400 of those first responders did not make it out alive. In rushing into those burning buildings, no one asked, "What god do you pray to? What beliefs do you hold?' We do not honor their lives by denying the very constitutional rights they died protecting. We honor those lives by defending those rights, and the freedoms those terrorists attacked."

The mayor appears to have plagiarized JFK's speech to the Houston ministers, where Kennedy defended a Catholic's right to run for president by invoking the heroic death of his brother Joe over the Channel.

But the issue here is not religious tolerance. There are a hundred mosques in New York City.

The issue here is the appalling insensitivity, if not calculated insult, of erecting a mosque two blocks from a World Trade Center where 3,000 Americans were massacred by Islamic fanatics whose Muslim religion was integral to their identity and mission.

It is no more religious bigotry to oppose the Ground Zero Mosque than it would have been religious bigotry to oppose building a Shinto shrine in 1950 on Ford Island in Pearl Harbor, next to the Arizona.

To Americans, the land on which the twin towers stood is hallowed ground, a burial site made scared by the suffering and deaths of all who perished in the horrifying minutes those towers burned and fell.

There are many such sites in America. Lexington, Concord Bridge, Bunker Hill, Yorktown, the Alamo, Manassas — where the first battle of the War Between the States was fought — Antietam, Fredericksburg, Chancellorsville, Vicksburg, Gettysburg.

When developers tried to build a mall next to the Manassas battlefield, many who had kinfolk who fought and died in that war blocked it, including Jody Powell, Jimmy Carter's press secretary.

They did not fight development because they opposed private enterprise, any more than those who blocked the licensing of a casino beside Gettysburg battlefield did so because they dislike gambling.

What is the purpose of this mosque and Islamic center, the name of which, Cordoba House, is taken from a city that became the Moorish capital after Catholic Spain was conquered and came under Islamic rule for eight centuries before the Reconquista of 1492?

How would Muslims in the Middle East react to the building of a Crusader House in the Holy Land, funded by the Vatican and built around a chapel dedicated to Pope Urban II?

Feisal Abdul Rauf, who is fronting for the project, says its purpose is healing, reconciliation, harmony.

Taking him at his word, why would Imam Feisal ferociously persist when the mosque was clearly enraging the families of the fallen of 9/11 and dividing, not uniting, New York and the country.

Nor has Imam Feisal been transparent about where he will come up with the $100 million for Cordoba House, or who is behind this, or what is the need for a 13-story mosque and community center so near where the twin towers stood.

As Claudia Rosett of Forbes has learned, Imam Feisal has been running the Cordoba Initiative, a charitable foundation whose total contributions over the five years ending in 2008 came to $100,000.

Yet he plans a 13-story mosque and community center that will, he says, employ 150 full-time and 500 part-time workers.

Mayor Bloomberg's statement also reflects a naivete about why bin Laden and al-Qaida sent those terrorists to wound our country and kill as many of us as they could in the most dramatic way they could.

Al-Qaida did not attack us because we have a free press and freedom of assembly. They sent terrorists to smash and burn the symbols of U.S. power — the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and the Capitol — because they hate our policies and, above all, our presence in the Dar al-Islam, the House of Islam. They wish to purify their region of the infidel, establish a caliphate and live under sharia.

To them, we are the new Crusaders, the new Romans, and by wounding and enraging us, they sucked us into a war on their terrain.

And those firemen, police and rescue workers did not run into those burning buildings to defend constitutional rights, but, acting out of bravery and love, to save their fellow men.

And as our God, the one true God, said, "Greater love than this hath no man, than that he lay down his life for his friend."

Tell them to put their mosque somewhere else, Mike.

Patrick Buchanan is the author of the book "Churchill, Hitler and 'The Unnecessary War." To find out more about Patrick Buchanan, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

8 Comments | Post Comment
This statement illustrates what's wrong with your claim.

"It is no more religious bigotry to oppose the Ground Zero Mosque than it would have been religious bigotry to oppose building a Shinto shrine in 1950 on Ford Island in Pearl Harbor, next to the Arizona."

The Japanese attack was done by a national government in the name of its whole people. The attack on the towers was done by a outlaw bunch of wacko extremists that doesn't in any respect represent the Islamic community. You seem to want to turn terrorism by a few nut cases into a holy war against a whole religion, some members of whom actually died in the terrorist act. That would be like blaming you for the pedophiles in the Catholic Church. Al Qaeda has be kicked out several Islamic countries and are now holed up in some cave in the ungovernable part of Pakistan. How are they representative of the larger Islamic community?
Comment: #1
Posted by: Elwood Anderson
Fri Aug 6, 2010 12:48 AM
Re: Elwood Anderson

Elwood your reply implies that you do not frequently read Buchanan's writings. He is just about the only mainstream commentator that has ever given me the impression of having read Bin Laden's fatwa. You too should take the time to read the fatwa, it may give you insight that you may not have had before.

Regardless of the number of warmongers if war has been declared by them then it is still war. So, it makes no sense to say the building of the mosque on Ground Zero does not compare to building of a Shinto shrine on Ford Island. A declaration of war was made with this attack and it is an affront to the memory of those who lost their lives to build a symbol of the attackers zealous ideology on that hallowed ground. As you may have or perhaps someday will read; Al Qaeda is a force that has declared war on the United States and all infidels who stand with her. What is it that motivates Al Qaeda? The Quran and the absolute destruction of those who live outside of their strict interpretation of its words.

I personally am on the fence about this matter, but again Mr. Buchanan shows clarity amid the chaos of opinion.
Comment: #2
Posted by: DougMagic
Fri Aug 6, 2010 5:12 AM
To respond to Mr. Anderson, I agree with you, the Muslim community in the world did not attack the U.S. And you were correct by saying some crazy bunch of nuts are the ones who were responsible of all that havoc. But sir, you failed to understand the human emotions. The people of the U.S. were attacked by these folks who they claimed that the did it in the name of Islam. And it resonates in the heads of the American people that Muslims are responsible for what had happened. I think the Muslim community could do more good by reaching out and being a part of a wounded community and try to explain their feelings about what had happen. How about a project were all people of New York city could benefit and as starting process to heal this wound. The Muslim community is an isolated community. They benefit from what this country offers and yet they want nothing to do with other people except their own. I say build a community center for all people and hire people to work with young people to stay off drugs or just basically a refuge from all bad things in this world. Something they can be proud off for all not just for themselves. I am an Arab American and I say NO to the mosque. I am an Arab but I am proud AMERICAN.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Henry Ahmed
Fri Aug 6, 2010 5:31 AM
And let us not forget the dancing in the streets in Muslim nations after the attack . Their nations may not have participated but their populations gave their approval after the fact. A Mosque in the neighborhood would be a feather in Ben Ladin's head scarf.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Daniel Johnson
Fri Aug 6, 2010 7:23 AM
IF Timothy McVeigh had stated that it was his belief in a radical form of Catholicism drove him to bomb the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building, would Mr. Buchanan propose that we not allow the construction of any Catholic centers near the memorial? Even if some Catholics in other countries were seen celebrating? Somehow, I doubt it.
I agree with Mr. Buchanan when he says that "...they sucked us into a war on their terrain". It is often said of President Regan that he caused the demise of the Soviet Union by sucking them into an arms race that bankrupted them. It would be horrible irony if the followers of Bin Laden were someday able to boast of how their hero, using only 19 fanatics with box cutters, was able to bankrupt our country by sucking us into wars we could neither truly win nor afford.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Mark
Fri Aug 6, 2010 10:22 AM
To begin with, I, a Muslim, will say that I do not favor building a mosque at the 9/11 site. I think people of all religons, ethnicity, etc should be able to give in at one point in order to stabilize their relationshis with one another in the long-run. Not building a mosque there would not be giving in too much.

In response to DougMagic ... you said: "What is it that motivates Al Qaeda? The Quran and the absolute destruction of those who live outside of their strict interpretation of its words." And you implied that's Buchanan's view also. I must disagree. When it comes to coming up with reasons why the US was attacked and is hated by those extreme groups, Mr. Buchanan doesn't believe its due merely their hatred of our lifestyle. In fact, many times he has cited its the West's 'imperialistic' types of foreign policies over many years that have ignited such hatred. And these extremists are merely utilizing religion to market their beliefs and give them the 'Holy' appearance. This has taken place in nearly every society under every religion throughout history. The best way to combat this is to minimize the extremist's leverage, which is based on the suffering of the 'regular' people. Sanctions against these countries create more hatred among the regular people. Because they suffer the most. The extremists then take advantage of this. We have seen this and continue to see it throughout history. Mr. Buchanan has gone more to the libertarian side during the past 10 yrs, in my opinion. And that's great to see.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Ali Mogharabi
Fri Aug 6, 2010 8:19 PM
I think we should but a mosque there…right after they put a Christian Church in Riyadh.
Comment: #7
Posted by: Lee Zehrer
Sun Aug 8, 2010 5:50 AM
It's so wonderful to read such sane comments on this blog. Pat Buchanan is very good and special man. And he is usually correct in his assessments. I wish you all would take the time to comment on the liberal blogs too. They need to hear common sense views on this subject. Fareed Zakaria should listen to the other side. Unfortunately, his utopian stupidity may damage the unity that was very well needed in this country.
Comment: #8
Posted by: sylvia
Wed Aug 11, 2010 2:48 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Pat Buchanan
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 18 Feb 2012
Oliver North
Oliver NorthUpdated 17 Feb 2012

13 Oct 2009 The Affirmative Action Nobel

2 Sep 2011 Looking Back at 'The Good War'

27 Nov 2009 Is the Church Militant Back?