creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Patrick Buchanan
Pat Buchanan
14 May 2013
The Heretic at Heritage

Jason Richwine, the young conservative scholar who co-authored the Heritage Foundation report on the long-… Read More.

10 May 2013
Requiem for a Grand Old Party

Has the bell begun to toll for the GOP? The question arises while reading an analysis of Census Bureau … Read More.

7 May 2013
Who Are the War Criminals in Syria?

Last week, several polls came out assessing U.S. public opinion on intervention in Syria. According to the … Read More.

The Democracy Worshipers

Comment

"Your people, sir, is ... a great beast."

So Alexander Hamilton reputedly said in an argument with Thomas Jefferson. At the Constitutional Convention of 1787, Hamilton explained:

"Real liberty is not found in the extremes of democracy, but in moderate governments. If we incline too much to democracy, we shall soon shoot into a monarchy, or some other form of dictatorship."

In his column, "Democracy Versus Liberty," Walter Williams cites Hamilton, James Madison and John Randolph, who wrote of "the follies and turbulence" of democracy, and John Adams:

"Democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide."

Yet what our fathers feared we embrace. For it may fairly be said of this generation that it worships democracy. Indeed, the fanaticism of this faith in democracy as the path to worldly salvation causes many to hail any and all revolutions against any and all autocrats.

One wonders: How is it that this childlike faith endures?

After all, the French Revolution gave us the Terror and Napoleonic wars. The Russian Revolution gave us Lenin, Stalin and 70 years of totalitarian horrors. Mao's revolution put 30 million Chinese in early graves.

Cuba's revolution gave us an end to freedom and 50 years of Fidel's cult of personality. Iran's revolution that took down the Shah raised up the Ayatollah.

One would think we would have learned a little skepticism.

Yet no sooner had the crowds in Tunis turned out their autocrat and the throngs taken over Tahrir Square in Cairo than our giddy elites were proclaiming the "Arab Spring" and demanding the United States get on the side of the Arab street against all autocrats.

Yet Hosni Mubarak, though a ruthless ruler, had been our man in Cairo since the assassination of Anwar Sadat, fighting alongside us in the Gulf War, keeping the peace with Israel, allying with us in the war on terror.

But as soon as the tide turned against him, we ditched him and cheered on the crowd in Tahrir Square, a few of whom celebrated the downfall of despotism with a sexual mauling of Lara Logan.

What our democracy-worshipers, our "power-to-the-people" lovers of revolution fail to understand is that revolutions unleash all the forces in a society, including the most noxious. Indeed, especially them.

To understand what revolutions and popular democracy are likely to produce, we need to understand the fires in the minds of the men who create or capture those revolutions.

And neither Africa nor Arabia offers much in the way of hope.

The overthrow of Ian Smith's government in Rhodesia brought to power Robert Mugabe and his Mashona, who proceeded to massacre the Matabele of rival Joshua Nkomo, rob the whites of their property, drive them out of their country and create the hellhole that is Zimbabwe.

Yet such is the power of democracy worship, this secular religion, to blind people to the evidence of their own eyes that virtually every Western leader favored one-man, one-vote democracy in Rhodesia.

As we see in Julius Malema, that admirer of Mugabe and 30-year-old firebrand of Mandela's ANC, just convicted of a hate crime for his singing of the anti-apartheid ditty "Shoot the Boer!" who wants to expropriate South Africa's mines and confiscate white farms, racism and tribalism are alive and well in liberated Southern Africa. And democracy is their enabler.

To know what the Arab Spring is likely to produce, one needs to look not only at the Kerenskys who lead the Facebook-Twitter revolutions, but the Lenins and Trotskys who stand silently behind them.

The Arabs of Tunisia, Egypt, Syria, Yemen and Bahrain want new leaders to reflect the popular will. And what is that will?

In the most recent elections, an Islamic party took power in Turkey. The Muslim Brotherhood advanced dramatically in Egypt. Hezbollah and Hamas were vaulted to power in Lebanon and Gaza.

Democratists who demand we distance ourselves from the kings of Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Morocco and Bahrain, who do they think will replace these monarchs?

Do they care, or is democracy the right way, results be damned?

In liberated Libya, reprisals are being perpetrated against the black Africans Moammar Gadhafi brought into the country, and the Islamists are surfacing.

In liberated Iraq, it is Muslim vs. Christian, Sunni vs. Shia, Arab vs. Kurd. In Sudan, it was Arab Muslim against African animist and Christian that tore the country in two. In Ethiopia, it was the ethnic Eritreans who seceded to establish a country of their own.

Looking at Africa and the Middle East, men seem willing to march for a better life and to demonstrate for democracy. But when it comes to fighting and dying, the calls of race, religion and tribe alone seem capable of compelling the ultimate sacrifice.

Before we endorse the right of all peoples to have what they want, perhaps we should know what they want. For in the Mideast, it appears that most would like to throw us out and throw our Israeli friends into the sea.

To find out more about Patrick Buchanan, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM



Comments

5 Comments | Post Comment
A Benevolent dictator is America's only hope as things actually get worse in the forthcoming years.
No other way to get around the gridlock

Might be General Petraeus

I hope it is RON PAUL

peace sells but who's buying...........
Comment: #1
Posted by: Soothsayer
Thu Sep 15, 2011 10:39 AM
Rarely does a Christian culture produce a George Washington. Never does a pagan culture.
Comment: #2
Posted by: cathy jones
Fri Sep 16, 2011 8:28 AM
Who is truly in charge of all this confusion? Democracy bad. Any social program is socialism, therefore bad. Freedom questionable. Jibber-jabber good.
Pat Buchanan strategy: Spout off historical data (or nonsense?) in such a random and confusing manner, that one cannot other than consider that I am brilliant and enlightened and correct.
Bush spun his wars from terrorism and WMD, into spawning democracy. Now democracy bad since Obama is in office.
Democracy, any social program (existing or new), any religion other than evangelistic Christianity, bad. Are not those that proselytize just appalled that they have fallen behind Islam in brain-washing new members? The right-wingers must then resort to stirring into the pot, fear and hate and lies and innuendo and anything else they can muster, even at the risk of (or even for the purpose of) completely destroying our freedom, in order to "win"?
Comment: #3
Posted by: Joanne Renshaw
Fri Sep 16, 2011 9:58 AM
Re: Joanne Renshaw

I think you belong over on Miguel Perez's site, for you apparently lack the ability to understand simple English.

Buchanan cites many examples to support his thesis, thereby spelling-out precisely what is involved with a blind faith in democracy, which causes the leaders of this nation to believe whatever the vested interests tell them.

You exhibit a lack of intellect, Ms. Renshaw, by failing to discuss the issue in an intelligent manner and your jealously of Buchanan's learned article is transparent.

What you find to be "random and confusing" is really over your head and you should not strain your brain in the vain attempt to discredit a man who can dance intellectual circles around you.

Better luck next time, fool!
Comment: #4
Posted by: T.H. Asgardson
Fri Sep 16, 2011 6:45 PM
"Democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide." What an idiotic couple of sentences. The same can be said of every form of government. The problem with human civilization is now and always has been succession.

Got a great leader? What happens when he dies and his spoiled brat son takes over? That has been the biggest problem of human civilization over the millenia of our existence.

Democracy had been tried very little as of the time those two sentences were uttered. Other forms of government had been tried over and over and over again and suffered exactly the fate articulated in those words.

All in all, the record of democracy has been pretty darn good, but there are many approaches to it. I agree that the mob rule approach is a loser, and if we move toward that we are toast.

Comment: #5
Posted by: Masako
Fri Sep 16, 2011 9:22 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Pat Buchanan
May. `13
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Betsy McCaughey
Betsy McCaugheyUpdated 15 May 2013
Ben Shapiro
Ben ShapiroUpdated 15 May 2013
Joseph Farah
Joseph FarahUpdated 15 May 2013

28 Sep 2007 Is Belgium Breaking Up?

4 Nov 2008 But Where Did Bush Go Wrong?

10 May 2011 Osama's Dead -- but Are His Ideas?