creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Patrick Buchanan
Pat Buchanan
15 Apr 2014
The End of Ideology?

On our TV talk shows and op-ed pages, and in our think tanks here, there is rising alarm over events abroad. … Read More.

11 Apr 2014
What Would Reagan Do?

President Reagan was holding a meeting in the Cabinet Room on March 25, 1985, when Press Secretary Larry … Read More.

8 Apr 2014
The New Blacklist

"There is a gay mafia," said Bill Maher, "if you cross them you do get whacked." Maher, the host of HBO's "… Read More.

No Syrian War to Save Obama's Face!

Comment

"Catastrophic!" said Sen. John McCain.

If Congress votes no on a resolution calling for U.S. intervention in Syria's civil war, says McCain, it would be "catastrophic" for U.S. credibility in the world.

Consider what the senator is saying here.

Because Barack Obama, two years ago, said "Assad must go," and, one year ago, said any use of chemical weapons crosses his "red line," Congress has no choice but to plunge America into yet another Mideast war.

Can this be? Are we really, as a nation, required to go to war to make good the simple-minded statements of an untutored president who had no constitutional authority to issue his impulsive ultimata?

Are we really required to go to war to get the egg off Obama's face?

Not since the War of Jenkins' Ear has there been a dumber cause for a great country to go to war. Is there no way out?

There is, and it's right in front of us.

The House, Senate or both can vote no on the war resolution and Obama can then say, as did David Cameron, that, while he disagrees, he respects the decision of a Congress in which the Constitution placed sole authority to authorize America's going to war.

Are Brits now crying "catastrophe!"? Do the Spanish no longer think the Brits will defend Gibraltar? Is Britain now wholly non-credible to the world?

For Obama, and for us, it is the other options that invite catastrophe.

If, for example, the House or Senate votes down the war resolution and Obama, without authorization from Congress, the Security Council, NATO or the Arab League plunges us into a new war this nation does not want to fight, he will be courting a geostrategic and political disaster.

Even if Congress approves a war resolution, the president should think long and hard about diving into a war he sought to avoid and stayed out of for over two years. Make no mistake; if Obama attacks Syria, be it for hours or days, we are in that blood-soaked abattoir for the duration.

In his dramatic statement Saturday, as politically astute as it was constitutionally correct, Obama called Syria "someone else's war."

Whose war? It is Shia Alawite vs. Sunni, Muslim vs. Christian, Kurd vs. Arab, Islamist vs. secularist. Backing Bashar Assad are Iran, Hezbollah and Russia.

Backing the rebels are Turkey, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf states, al-Qaida, foreign jihadists and the Muslim Brotherhood.

Assad is accused of killing 100,00 people. But that is the total of the dead in a civil war Assad has as much right to fight as the rebels. While his army is accused of using gas on civilians, the Islamist rebels have murdered Christians, massacred captives and engaged in public acts of cannibalism on dead Syrian soldiers.

Gas is a sickening weapon. Yet, there is no evidence thus far that Assad ordered its use. Rebel elements are said to have been found with sarin. As for Americans who tend to prefer white phosphorus, napalm and cluster bombs, upon what lofty moral ground do we stand?

Have we forgotten that Churchill wanted to drop anthrax on Germany and settled for two days of firebombing the defenseless city of Dresden? Or that our great friend Anwar Sadat was the confidante of Gamal Abdel Nasser when Egypt was using poison gas on Yemeni tribesmen?

The United States does not have any national security interest in Syria's war. Why would we then launch missile attacks to "degrade" Assad's military, when that army and air force are all that stands between us and a privileged sanctuary for al-Qaida in northern Syria, not unlike what al-Qaida had in Tora Bora and Waziristan.

We are told that if we do not strike Syria — making good on Obama's threats — Israel, Turkey and even Japan and South Korea will not be able to trust us ever again.

What nonsense. We have treaties with Japan and South Korea. As for Turkey and Israel, if what is happening in Syria is outrageous and dangerous, why do they not act? Why do they keep tugging at our sleeve?

The Israeli Air force is five minutes from Damascus, its army a two-day march. The Turks have three times Syria's population and a 400,000-man army equipped with NATO weapons. Together, they could invade and turn the tide in a week. Why do they not man up?

McCain and Sen. Lindsey Graham came out of the Oval Office saying Obama was open to wider strikes on Syria and more lethal support for the rebels. As Iran, Hezbollah and Russia would then upgrade their own weapons shipments to Damascus, this will mean more dead, more wounded, more tens of thousands fleeing into exile and a longer war.

But what it will likely end with, after America is dragooned in, is a U.S. war with Iran; our allies, sitting in their box seats, cheering us on.

And that is the dog you will not hear bark in the war-on-Syria debate.

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of "Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025?" To find out more about Patrick Buchanan and read features by other Creators writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators webpage at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2013 CREATORS.COM



Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
Sorry to say it. Very sorry to say it, but chemical warfare has been fought all along by powers that be. Whether the chemical is one that explodes in your face, ripping your brains out, or one that invades your respiratory system and suffocates you, is a distinction I have never gotten.

I get the "destroy the planet" concern about nukes, but the "weapons of mass destruction" lumping mantra has never meant anything more to me than a big cow pie on a meadow. In fact, I would go for the cow pie any day.

These nitwits with power over the troops are a menace. They keep repeating the same mistakes over and over and over again. You know the old saying--power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely. Obama is under water. He is a law school professor who has dumped himself into the real world and the tide is sweeping him out to sea.

The sad thing is that old Buchyballs here actually thought Boehner would stand up to that mediocrity. (See his last column. Nope.

"Bring me more!" cries that son of an alcohol dealer. We are truly screwed with "leaders" like these who do nothing more to actually lead than a worm does as it plows through the dirt.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Masako
Tue Sep 3, 2013 9:35 PM
Just my personal opinion but the Obama administration is like a bad Saturday Night Live skit (but with "collateral" damage to the audience).

The Washington Uber hawks talk like Syrian troops are coming ashore in San Diego and attacking mom and pop.
But since Russia will not allow Assad to go down, the USA attack is just drama theater.

What Iran sees in all of this is that the sooner they can get a deliverable nuke, the sooner they will be immune from attack by the west.

However, the Washington neocons that helped jack the George W. presidency are still out there in the shadows, determined to flip the regimes in Syria and Iran (How's that Iraq and Libya working out for ya?)

I cannot imagine what my beloved country will look like in 2025.............

Comment: #2
Posted by: Soothsayer
Wed Sep 4, 2013 10:17 AM
Re: Soothsayer. Too bad we didn't elect Eddie Murphy for prez. He'd be a lot more entertaining and a good skit.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Masako
Wed Sep 4, 2013 10:04 PM
OOps. How could I forget to mention: He's a lot more qualified too.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Masako
Wed Sep 4, 2013 10:08 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Pat Buchanan
Apr. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
30 31 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Ben Carson
Ben CarsonUpdated 16 Apr 2014
Brent Bozell
Walter Williams
Walter E. WilliamsUpdated 16 Apr 2014

8 Nov 2013 The Knives Come Out -- for Christie

10 Aug 2010 The Solomon of San Francisco

3 Jun 2011 Obama in a Dream World