creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Patrick Buchanan
Pat Buchanan
17 Feb 2012
The New Blacklist

My days as a political analyst at MSNBC have come to an end. After 10 enjoyable years, I am departing, after … Read More.

14 Feb 2012
On to Tehran -- or Is It Damascus?

Our War Party has been temporarily diverted from its clamor for war on Iran by the insurrection against the … Read More.

10 Feb 2012
Obama's Trampling on God's Turf Now

Yes, Virginia, there is a religious war going on. It is for the soul of America. And traditional Christianity … Read More.

Mitt's Hour of Power

Share Comment

If Mitt Romney wins the Republican nomination, it will be due in large measure to his splendid and moving defense of his faith and beliefs delivered today at the George Bush Presidential Library.

The address was courageous in a way John F. Kennedy's speech to the Baptist ministers was not. Kennedy went to Houston to assure the ministers he agreed with them on virtually every issue where they differed with the Catholic agenda and that his faith would not affect any decision he made as president. He called himself "the Democratic Party's candidate for president who happens also to be a Catholic."

It was like saying: "I happen to be left-handed. I can't help it."

Romney did not truckle. He did not suggest that his faith was irrelevant to the formation of his political philosophy. While declaring, "I will serve no one religion, no one group, no one cause and no one interest," he did not back away an inch from his Mormon faith."

"There are some for whom these commitments are not enough," said Romney. "They would prefer it if I would simply distance myself from my religion, say that it is more a tradition than my personal conviction, or disavow one or another of its precepts. That I will not do. I believe in my Mormon faith, and I endeavor to live by it. My faith is the faith of my fathers. I will be true to them and to my beliefs."

If this costs me the presidency, said Romney, so be it.

That is the kind of defiance this country can never hear enough of.

What Romney was saying was: If you so dislike or resent my faith you will not vote for me if I stay true to it, don't vote for me. But that may say more about you than it does about me.

Questioned repeatedly on what he, as a Mormon, believes about Jesus Christ, a matter crucial to evangelicals, Romney replied:

"What do I believe about Jesus Christ? I believe that Christ is the Son of God and the Savior of mankind. My church's beliefs about Christ may not all be the same as those of other faiths. Each religion has it own unique doctrines and history. These are not bases for criticism but rather a test of our tolerance. Religious tolerance would be a shallow principle if it were reserved only for faiths with which we agree."

Surely that is right.

After defending his own faith, Romney declared himself a fighting ally of traditionalists and conservatives in the culture war against a militant secularism that is hostile to all faiths rooted in supernatural beliefs and that seeks to de-Christianize America.

"(T)he notion of separation of church and state has been taken by some beyond its original meaning," Romney said, "They seek to remove from the public domain any acknowledgement of God.

Religion is seen as merely a private affair with no place in the public life. It is as if they are intent on establishing a new religion in America — the religion of secularism. They are wrong.

"We should acknowledge the Creator as did the Founders — in ceremony and word. He should remain in our currency, in our pledge, in the teaching of our history and, during the holiday seasons, Nativity scenes and Menorahs should be welcome in our public places."

Romney understands that while the First Amendment proscribes the establishment of religion, it guarantees the free expression of all religions, even in the public school. Supreme Court, take note. "I will not separate us from the God who gave us liberty," said Romney.

This was a tour de force, and it was delivered before perhaps the largest audience Romney will have for any speech before the January caucuses and primaries. It will be the subject of editorials and columns in coming weeks. And it is hard to see how Romney does not benefit hugely from what was a quintessentially "American" address

With this speech, Romney has thrown on the defensive his main rival in Iowa, Mike Huckabee, the Christians' candidate who, when asked if Mormonism is a cult, left the impression it might well be.

The issues of religious tolerance, what it means to be a Christian in politics, and of secularism versus traditionalism are all now out on the table, and will likely be the social-moral issues on which the race turns between now and January.

To this writer, Romney is on unassailable grounds. Nor is he hurt by the fact that his wife and five children testify eloquently that he is a man of principles who lives by them.

Mike Huckabee's ascendancy and Romney's address defending his faith, refusing to disavow his beliefs and making this a test of tolerance while launching an offensive against secular humanism, tell us that God is back — in the presidential campaign.

To find out more about Patrick Buchanan, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2007 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
I was only somewhat familiar with Pat Buchannan (from his presidentail run) until the last several months when I discovered his writing. Finally, I thought, here is someone who doesn't regurgitate one party line or the other and yet still understands statesmanship and diplomacy. Why isn't this man being drafted for the presidency when this country needs him the most?
Unfortunately, his last two editorials could be synopsized as: "Too much diversity is killing our country" and "We need more God in our government and our schools". My "Buchanan for President" grassroots effort hit the skids. I now understand why he is as un-electable in '08 as he was in '96. What a shame.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Ryan
Fri Dec 7, 2007 11:17 AM
In many respectsRomney's speech showed an intolerant and unbending side - the one that wants to adhere to Republican Orthodoxy as the supreme creed. Before religion was ever discussed, he had to get in the line that Bush senior's generation rose to occasion then "to vanquish the Soviet Union." The reference was clearly to Saint Ronald the Linereader who is given credit for the downfall of the Soviet system in the holy tenets of the GOP. And he felt compelled to reinforce his doctrinaire acceptance of the new evils from which the Republican party would protect us - radical violent Islam, China, government overspending, overuse of foreign oil (note overuse not reliance on), and the breakdown of the family. This was intended as a campaign speech, not a challenge to bigotry.

Moving to the theme of religion, the basic speech was written to show the die-hard opponents of separation that he too believed that only the god-fearing have a place in society; the digs at secularism, the emphasis that all men of piety should pray together were meant to be as exclusionary as one could possibly be - to exclude those who wish to keep observance and pronouncement in the home and the houses of worship and out of the judicial nominating world and as far away as possible from the legislative arena.
Comment: #2
Posted by: malach hamovess
Mon Dec 10, 2007 4:49 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Pat Buchanan
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 18 Feb 2012
Oliver North
Oliver NorthUpdated 17 Feb 2012

17 Jun 2011 Fed Up With Freeloaders

29 May 2010 Remembering Wars and Warriors

29 Apr 2010 Stand Up for Arizona