creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Patrick Buchanan
Pat Buchanan
1 Aug 2014
Stop the Coming Obamnesty!

According to Rep. Luis Gutierrez, Obama intends "to act broadly and generously" on behalf of the "millions … Read More.

29 Jul 2014
A GOP Ultimatum to Vlad

With the party united, the odds are now at least even that the GOP will not only hold the House but also … Read More.

25 Jul 2014
Is Putin Worse Than Stalin?

In 1933, the Holodomor was playing out in Ukraine. After the "kulaks," the independent farmers, had been … Read More.

Make Congress Vote on War on Iran

Comment

Returning from Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta dropped some jolting news.

Asked by CBS's Scott Pelley if Iran could have a nuclear weapon in 2012, Panetta replied: "It would probably be about a year before they could do it. Perhaps a little less. But one proviso, Scott, is that if they have a hidden facility somewhere in Iran that may be enriching fuel."

Panetta was saying the mullahs are a year or less away from an atom bomb, and if they have a hidden site for enriching uranium to weapons grade, they may be even closer.

"That is a red line for us," Panetta added. "If we get intelligence they are proceeding with developing a nuclear weapon, then we will take whatever steps necessary to deal with it."

Panetta is raising the specter of pre-emptive war.

When Pelley's report hit, however, the Pentagon immediately began to walk the cat back.

"The secretary was clear that we have no indication that the Iranians have made a decision to develop a nuclear weapon," said Pentagon press secretary George Little. "He (Panetta) didn't say that Iran would, in fact, have a nuclear weapon in 2012."

Little added that U.N. inspectors remain in Iran and have access to its uranium stockpile, and should Iran attempt a "breakout" by diverting low-enriched uranium to a hidden facility to convert it to weapons grade, U.N. inspectors would instantly detect the diversion.

"We would retain sufficient time under any such scenario to take appropriate action," said Little.

In short, the Pentagon does not believe Iran has made a decision to build atomic weapons, and the department is confident that, should it do so, the United States would have ample warning.

Little's definitive statement, "We have no indication that the Iranians have made a decision to develop a nuclear weapon," coincides with the consensus of all 16 U.S. intelligence agencies, including the CIA and Defense Intelligence Agency, in December 2007.

In that report, the entire U.S. intelligence community stated unanimously, with "high confidence," that Iran had given up its drive for an atom bomb back in 2003.

Yet the Pentagon's categorical statement this week, and the 2007 declaration by the entire U.S. intelligence community that Iran abandoned its bomb program in 2003, raises a question.

How could the International Atomic Energy Agency conclude, as it did last month, that Iran "has carried out activities relevant to the development of a nuclear device"? Did the IAEA discover clandestine bomb-building that our own intelligence community failed to detect?

If Iran is doing experiments consistent with building an atomic bomb, as the IAEA reports, why does the U.S.

intelligence community not revise and update its 2007 report? Why are CIA and DIA silent?

This is no minor matter. For not only have Panetta and Barack Obama talked about "all options on the table" regarding Iran — i.e., we do not rule out military strikes — so, too, have the GOP presidential candidates, save Rep. Ron Paul.

Sen. Rick Santorum says we are already at war:

"Iran is a country that has been at war with us since 1979. ... The Iranians are the existential threat to Israel."

In fierce rebuttal to Paul's suggestion that the real threat to America is being stampeded into a new war, Rep. Michele Bachmann retorted:

"We know beyond the shadow of a doubt that Iran will take a nuclear weapon, they will use it to wipe our ally Israel off the face of the map. ... The Iran Constitution ... states unequivocally that their mission is to extend jihad across the world and eventually to set up a worldwide caliphate."

But is all this consistent or credible?

If Iran is an "existential threat" to Israel and intends to use a bomb it is now building on Israel, why have the Israelis, with 200 to 300 nuclear weapons, who have bombed both Iraqi and Syrian nuclear sites, not removed that "existential threat" themselves?

Second, assume the Bachmann horror scenario that we know "beyond the shadow of a doubt" that Iran, as soon as it gets the bomb it is building, will use it on Israel. If that is so, who does Bachmann think will then be establishing that caliphate in an Iran that an Israeli retaliatory strike will have reduced to atomic ash?

Lest we forget, the Israelis are a "Never Again!" nation.

And there is another serious matter here. While Obamaites, neocons and Republicans are talking about "all options on the table," the war option, if we still have a Constitution, cannot be used against a nation that has not attacked us, unless Congress, which alone has the power to declare war, has authorized military action.

When did Congress tell Obama or any president he can bomb Iran as soon as he concludes Iran is building a nuclear weapon? If, after leaving Iraq, we are going into yet another war of choice, let the Congress debate and vote on this new war with Iran.

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of "Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025?" To find out more about Patrick Buchanan and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM



Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
So the number one threat to world peace is the USA

The number one threat to middle east peace is Israel

A vote for Obama is a vote for a George W Bush clone

As a nation we find ourselves in an Orwellian state with a government policy of control by propaganda, surveillance, misinformation, denial of truth, and manipulation of the past, Big Brother, thought police, and perpeptual war waged by 'The Ministry of Peace'

Where is the outrage from the American people?

Me, I like RON PAUL

peace out
Comment: #1
Posted by: Soothsayer
Fri Dec 23, 2011 7:05 AM
Israel will never put up with a nuclear Iran. Or anything even close to it. Anyone with empathy for those who live within Israel's borders can understand that. You get tired of hearing that everyone who surrounds you wants you to be wiped out.

Remember who the "everyone" are--a bunch of savages who believe in cutting off hands and heads for works of the devil like adultery, defaming Allah, witchcraft, etc. Remember when they put out a death sentence on Salman Rushdie? These people would still be living in caves if it weren't for oil.

And don't even think of being a women in any country in that region other than Israel and even pretending to be a human being with civil rights. That will get you anything from jail to a death sentence as well. Reality can be very unpleasant, but it is there come rain or shine.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Masako
Sun Dec 25, 2011 6:06 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Pat Buchanan
Aug. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Lawrence Kudlow
Lawrence KudlowUpdated 2 Aug 2014
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 2 Aug 2014
Brent Bozell

15 Jan 2010 Is a U.S. Default Inevitable?

28 Aug 2009 †The Get-Cheney Squad

6 Jun 2014 Somewhere, Bin Laden Is Smiling