creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Patrick Buchanan
Pat Buchanan
19 Sep 2014
What Will Victory Look Like?

"Congress must now vote to support the first steps of what will be a long march toward victory," said … Read More.

16 Sep 2014
What Would Braveheart Do?

No matter how the vote turns out on Thursday in Scotland, either for independence or continued union with Britain,… Read More.

12 Sep 2014
The Forever War

The strategy that President Obama laid out Wednesday night to "degrade and ultimately destroy the terrorist … Read More.

Let Obama Play the Iran Hand

Comment

When, after the massacres at Newtown and the Washington Navy Yard, Republicans refused to outlaw the AR-15 rifle or require background checks for gun purchasers, we were told the party had committed suicide by defying 90 percent of the nation.

When Republicans rejected amnesty and a path to citizenship for illegal aliens, we were told the GOP had just forfeited its future.

When House Republicans refused to fund Obamacare, the government was shut down and the Tea Party was blamed, word went forth:

The GOP has destroyed its brand. Republicans face a wipeout in 2014. It will take a generation to remove this mark of Cain.

Eight weeks later, Obama's approval is below 40 percent. Most Americans find him untrustworthy. And the GOP is favored to hold the seats it has in the House while making gains in the Senate.

For this reversal of fortunes, Republicans can thank the rollout of Obamacare — the website that does not work, the revelation that, contrary to Obama's promise, millions are losing health care plans that they liked, and the reports of soaring premiums and sinking benefits.

Democrats, however, might take comfort in the old maxim: If you don't like the weather here, just wait a while.

For, egged on by Bibi Netanyahu and the Israeli Lobby AIPAC, the neocons are anticipating the return of Congress to start work on new sanctions on Iran. Should they succeed, they just might abort the Geneva talks or even torpedo the six-month deal with Iran.

While shaking a fist in the face of the Ayatollah will rally the Republican base, it does not appear to be a formula for winning the nation.

According to a Reuters/Ipsos poll from Tuesday, by 44-22 Americans approve of the deal NATO, Russia and China cut with Tehran to freeze its nuclear program.

While two-thirds do not trust Iran when it says its program is not designed to build nuclear weapons, fully 65 percent believe "the United States should not become involved in any military action in the Middle East unless America is directly threatened."

Only 21 percent disagree.

This is the nation that rose up last summer and told Obama it did not want to get involved in Syria's civil war, and told Congress to deny Obama the authority to order air strikes — red line or no red line.

Even if the Iran deal collapses, 80 percent of Americans would favor a return to the sanctions regime and negotiations.

Only 20 percent would support military action against Iran.

In summary, while Americans do not trust Iran, they do not want war with Iran. They want to test Iran. On this issue, Obama is in sync with his countrymen.

Why, looking at these numbers, would Republicans return to Washington with a full-metal-jacket ,"axis-of-evil" attitude, with John McCain becoming again the face of the party?

Why would Republicans return to Washington and throw away the winning hand that is Obamacare? It is ravaging the president's reputation for competence and his credibility, and calling into question the core philosophy of the Democratic Party — that Big Government is America's salvation.

Why would Republicans return to the bellicosity that cost the party both Houses in 2006 and the White House in 2008?

That 20 percent of the nation which favors war with Iran, in the event of a deal collapse or breakdown in the talks, is already in the GOP corral. If Republicans seek to broaden their base, why abandon Obamacare, where a majority agrees with them, for an issue, renewed hostility to Iran, where a majority disagrees?

Would it not be playing into Obama's hand to allow him to assume the role of statesman, who, with "all options on the table," is willing to negotiate with an enemy rather than take us to war with him?

Did not Eisenhower, Nixon and Reagan all go this same route?

If Bibi, AIPAC, the neocons and their congressional allies should sabotage the negotiations or scuttle the existing or future deal with Iran, maneuvering us into a another war in the Middle East that America does not want, how do they think this will sit with the voters in 2016?

If Iran is deceiving us and is hell-bent on breaking out of this deal and making a dash to a bomb, we will know about it months if not years before Iran ever tests a device, let alone builds a bomb, miniaturizes it and marries it to a delivery system.

We would have more than enough notice to abort any test and neutralize Iran's nuclear program. And the nation would unite behind action, were it seen that Iran had lied to us to buy time to build and test a bomb.

But if the Republican Party leads Congress in imposing new sanctions, and the Iranians walk out, and the NATO-Russia-China coalition breaks up, and a chance for peace in the Persian Gulf seems to have been thrown away, the GOP will pay the price. And rightly so.

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of "Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025?" To find out more about Patrick Buchanan and read features by other Creators writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators webpage at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2013 CREATORS.COM



Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
Nice, easy words from a guy who doesn't have to live with the consequences of his wrong opinions. He doesn't live across the border from Iran.

He is safely half the planet away, far, far away from any nukes Iran might lob in his lifetime, in a nice, word-selling, money-making place. Sweet.

Fancies himself taking a front place, comfy row in the "Christian" institution he patronizes.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Masako
Fri Nov 29, 2013 7:38 PM
Masako,
Is this deal perfect? No, everybody sitting in a giant circle singing "We are the world" or perhaps a "It's a small world / Kumbaya" re-mix with a dedication to universal freedom and non-violence would be more like it. That, obviously, ain't gonna happen. So this brings the question: What path do you suggest instead of the current diplomatic approach? I don't think we can afford another war, no matter how much the war party yearns for one.
.
Iran is well aware that their oil is not going to last forever. They see nuclear power as a key energy source for the future. As a signatory to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, (unlike, say, Israel...) they have the right to develop nuclear power, including the fuel cycle. It would be nice if they would agree to let others do the enrichment for fuel, but, realistically, if you were the president of Iran, would you agree to hand a key step in production of your nation's energy to others to control? If the current moderate president fully capitulates to Israel's demands, how long is he likely to last, politically? How likely is it that we would get a better deal out of his successor?
.
Another factor in all of this is that Iran is in an ecological crisis over water. Abundant energy is going to be needed to deal with the crisis and they know it.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Mark
Sat Nov 30, 2013 10:18 AM
The deal is not really about nuclear power. Just take a look at the deal and all the companies that are now allowed access to Iran. This was Obama doing what he does best: doling out favors and cash to his corperate masters. A total sellout.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Mon Dec 2, 2013 8:36 AM
Chris,
The question remains: What is the better path forward? I don't see too many better options. I think he has played this hand fairly well, and yes, I am sure the corporations aren't going to loose too much money in the deal either. But we didn't kill a 100,000 people either.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Mark
Mon Dec 2, 2013 8:29 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Pat Buchanan
Sep. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Lawrence Kudlow
Lawrence KudlowUpdated 20 Sep 2014
Patrick Buchanan
Pat BuchananUpdated 19 Sep 2014
Linda Chavez
Linda ChavezUpdated 19 Sep 2014

21 Jan 2011 How the Chinese Must See Us

16 Apr 2013 Is Christianity Homophobic?

20 Jun 2008 Was the Holocaust Inevitable?